Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLO | $7.55 | +2.72% | 1.6B | 21.59 | $0.35 | +11.26% |
| JBS | $12.23 | +2.60% | 27.1B | 7.55 | $1.62 | +8.46% |
| KHC | $22.47 | +2.00% | 26.6B | -4.62 | -$4.86 | +7.12% |
| GIS | $34.43 | +3.27% | 18.4B | 8.42 | $4.09 | +7.20% |
| HRL | $24.72 | +2.53% | 13.6B | 29.08 | $0.85 | +4.80% |
| MKC | $47.38 | +3.61% | 12.7B | 7.77 | $6.10 | +3.96% |
| MKC-V | $47.18 | +2.23% | 12.7B | 7.73 | $6.10 | +4.02% |
| SJM | $110.47 | +3.06% | 11.8B | -84.98 | -$1.30 | +4.05% |
| MICC | $16.74 | +2.39% | 10.2B | 30.43 | $0.55 | N/A |
| DAR | $52.78 | -0.83% | 8.4B | 38.23 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLO vs JBS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while JBS trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JBS's competition here
FLO vs KHC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while KHC trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check KHC's competition here
FLO vs GIS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while GIS trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check GIS's competition here
FLO vs HRL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while HRL trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HRL's competition here
FLO vs MKC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MKC trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MKC's competition here
FLO vs MKC-V Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MKC-V trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MKC-V's competition here
FLO vs SJM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SJM trades at $110.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -84.98. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SJM's competition here
FLO vs MICC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MICC trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MICC's competition here
FLO vs DAR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while DAR trades at $52.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DAR's competition here
FLO vs PPC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while PPC trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PPC's competition here
FLO vs CAG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while CAG trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -134.30. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CAG's competition here
FLO vs CPB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while CPB trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CPB's competition here
FLO vs LW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while LW trades at $44.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LW's competition here
FLO vs INGR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while INGR trades at $97.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check INGR's competition here
FLO vs BRFS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRFS's competition here
FLO vs LANC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LANC's competition here
FLO vs TWNK Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TWNK's competition here
FLO vs TWNKW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TWNKW's competition here
FLO vs POST Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while POST trades at $88.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check POST's competition here
FLO vs MZTI Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MZTI trades at $108.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MZTI's competition here
FLO vs CENTA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while CENTA trades at $37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CENTA's competition here
FLO vs CENT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while CENT trades at $43.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CENT's competition here
FLO vs FRPT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while FRPT trades at $53.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FRPT's competition here
FLO vs SOVO Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SOVO's competition here
FLO vs KLG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check KLG's competition here
FLO vs NOMD Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while NOMD trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NOMD's competition here
FLO vs JJSF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while JJSF trades at $72.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JJSF's competition here
FLO vs BRBR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRBR trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRBR's competition here
FLO vs HLF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while HLF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HLF's competition here
FLO vs THS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check THS's competition here
FLO vs SMPL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SMPL trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SMPL's competition here
FLO vs SENEA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SENEA trades at $160.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SENEA's competition here
FLO vs SENEB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SENEB trades at $160.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SENEB's competition here
FLO vs JBSS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 954.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while JBSS trades at $81.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JBSS's competition here
FLO vs WEST Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 885.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while WEST trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WEST's competition here
FLO vs MAMA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 769.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MAMA trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 126.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MAMA's competition here
FLO vs STKL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check STKL's competition here
FLO vs UTZ Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while UTZ trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check UTZ's competition here
FLO vs THRN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check THRN's competition here
FLO vs LWAY Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 437.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while LWAY trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LWAY's competition here
FLO vs BRCC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 392.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRCC trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRCC's competition here
FLO vs NATR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 365.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while NATR trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NATR's competition here
FLO vs USNA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 355.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while USNA trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check USNA's competition here
FLO vs BYND Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 349.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BYND trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BYND's competition here
FLO vs BGS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BGS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BGS's competition here
FLO vs FREE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FREE's competition here
FLO vs WESTW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WESTW's competition here
FLO vs OFRM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while OFRM trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -62.56. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check OFRM's competition here
FLO vs MMMB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MMMB's competition here
FLO vs PLIN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PLIN's competition here
FLO vs FTLF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 109.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while FTLF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FTLF's competition here
FLO vs WYHG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while WYHG trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WYHG's competition here
FLO vs ABVEW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while ABVEW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ABVEW's competition here
FLO vs LFVN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while LFVN trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LFVN's competition here
FLO vs BOF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BOF trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BOF's competition here
FLO vs BRID Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRID trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRID's competition here
FLO vs MITC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MITC's competition here
FLO vs HAIN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while HAIN trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HAIN's competition here
FLO vs LSF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while LSF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LSF's competition here
FLO vs CLXT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CLXT's competition here
FLO vs HAPP Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HAPP's competition here
FLO vs BRLS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRLS trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRLS's competition here
FLO vs FARM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FARM's competition here
FLO vs BRLSW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRLSW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRLSW's competition here
FLO vs DDC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while DDC trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DDC's competition here
FLO vs YGF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check YGF's competition here
FLO vs JVA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while JVA trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JVA's competition here
FLO vs MWYN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MWYN trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MWYN's competition here
FLO vs COOT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while COOT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check COOT's competition here
FLO vs NAII Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while NAII trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NAII's competition here
FLO vs PETZ Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while PETZ trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PETZ's competition here
FLO vs TTCF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TTCF's competition here
FLO vs PLAG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while PLAG trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PLAG's competition here
FLO vs BON Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BON trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BON's competition here
FLO vs NUZE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NUZE's competition here
FLO vs ABVE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while ABVE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ABVE's competition here
FLO vs BTTR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BTTR's competition here
FLO vs HCWC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while HCWC trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HCWC's competition here
FLO vs ATPC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while ATPC trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ATPC's competition here
FLO vs FREEW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FREEW's competition here
FLO vs SOWG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SOWG trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SOWG's competition here
FLO vs ORIS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while ORIS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ORIS's competition here
FLO vs RGF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check RGF's competition here
FLO vs IMG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check IMG's competition here
FLO vs NCRA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while NCRA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NCRA's competition here
FLO vs FAMI Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while FAMI trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FAMI's competition here
FLO vs STKH Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 66.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while STKH trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check STKH's competition here
FLO vs SNAXW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SNAXW's competition here
FLO vs PAVS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while PAVS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PAVS's competition here
FLO vs LNCE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while LNCE trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LNCE's competition here
FLO vs VGFC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check VGFC's competition here
FLO vs SAFM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SAFM's competition here
FLO vs BRCN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRCN's competition here
FLO vs MJN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while MJN trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MJN's competition here
FLO vs DTEA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DTEA's competition here
FLO vs PF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.55, while PF trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PF's competition here