Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while JBS trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check JBS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while KHC trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check KHC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while GIS trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check GIS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MKC trades at $55.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MKC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MKC-V trades at $54.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MKC-V's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SJM trades at $130.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SJM's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while HRL trades at $23.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check HRL's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MICC trades at $20.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MICC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while DAR trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check DAR's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SFD trades at $22.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SFD's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while CAG trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check CAG's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while LW trades at $55.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check LW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while PPC trades at $31.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check PPC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while CPB trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check CPB's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while INGR trades at $104.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check INGR's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRFS trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRFS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while LANC trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check LANC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while TWNK trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check TWNK's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check TWNKW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while POST trades at $81.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check POST's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FRPT trades at $74.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FRPT's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MZTI trades at $113.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MZTI's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SOVO trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SOVO's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while KLG trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check KLG's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while JJSF trades at $88.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check JJSF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FLO trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FLO's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SENEB trades at $193.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SENEB's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SENEA trades at $191.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SENEA's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while HLF trades at $12.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check HLF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while UTZ trades at $14.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check UTZ's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRBR trades at $10.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRBR's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while THS trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check THS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 932.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SMPL trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SMPL's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 885.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while JBSS trades at $75.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check JBSS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 794.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while WEST trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -19.38. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check WEST's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 779.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MAMA trades at $16.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 104.75. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MAMA's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while STKL trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check STKL's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 706.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while OFRM trades at $16.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -35.06. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFRM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check OFRM's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while THRN trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check THRN's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while OTLY trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -31.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check OTLY's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while LWAY trades at $26.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check LWAY's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BGS trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BGS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRCC trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRCC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while NATR trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check NATR's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BYND trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYND's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BYND's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FREE trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FREE's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while WESTW trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check WESTW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MMMB trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MMMB's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while PLIN trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check PLIN's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FTLF trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FTLF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while LFVN trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check LFVN's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while HAIN trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check HAIN's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while WYHG trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 135.00. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check WYHG's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MITC trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MITC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRID trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRID's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BOF trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BOF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while LSF trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check LSF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while CLXT trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check CLXT's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while HAPP trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check HAPP's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRLSW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRLSW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FARM trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FARM's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRLS trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRLS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while YGF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check YGF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while JVA trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check JVA's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while DDC trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check DDC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while COOT trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -46.24. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check COOT's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while NAII trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check NAII's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while TTCF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check TTCF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while COOTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOTW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check COOTW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while NUZE trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check NUZE's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BTTR trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTTR's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BTTR's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FAMI trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FAMI's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while FREEW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check FREEW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while NCRA trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check NCRA's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while ATPC trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check ATPC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while ORIS trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check ORIS's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while STKH trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKH's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check STKH's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while RGF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check RGF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while IMG trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check IMG's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while ABVE trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check ABVE's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SNAXW's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while PF trades at $66.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check PF's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while MJN trades at $89.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check MJN's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while BRCN trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check BRCN's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while DTEA trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check DTEA's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while VGFC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check VGFC's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while LNCE trades at $49.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check LNCE's competition here

Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE: NOMD) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NOMD stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOMD is priced at $12.15 on the NYSE, while SAFM trades at $204.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NOMD currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, NOMD's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NOMD is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOMD.Check SAFM's competition here