Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UTZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTZ | $7.07 | -0.56% | 601.6M | -67.95 | -$0.10 | +3.64% |
| JBS | $12.18 | +2.48% | 27.1B | 7.54 | $1.62 | +8.24% |
| KHC | $22.62 | -0.64% | 26.6B | -4.62 | -$4.86 | +7.14% |
| GIS | $33.45 | +3.96% | 17.2B | 7.87 | $4.09 | +7.65% |
| HRL | $23.65 | +2.23% | 12.8B | 27.41 | $0.85 | +5.04% |
| MKC | $47.63 | +2.89% | 12.5B | 7.64 | $6.10 | +4.00% |
| MKC-V | $47.08 | +2.35% | 12.5B | 7.63 | $6.10 | +4.00% |
| SJM | $104.17 | +2.86% | 10.8B | -8.58 | -$11.79 | +4.38% |
| MICC | $17.10 | +2.27% | 10.4B | 30.42 | $0.56 | N/A |
| DAR | $59.26 | -3.72% | 9.7B | 44.01 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UTZ vs JBS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while JBS trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check JBS's competition here
UTZ vs KHC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while KHC trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check KHC's competition here
UTZ vs GIS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while GIS trades at $33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check GIS's competition here
UTZ vs HRL Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while HRL trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check HRL's competition here
UTZ vs MKC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MKC trades at $47.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MKC's competition here
UTZ vs MKC-V Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MKC-V trades at $47.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MKC-V's competition here
UTZ vs SJM Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SJM trades at $104.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SJM's competition here
UTZ vs MICC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MICC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MICC's competition here
UTZ vs DAR Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while DAR trades at $59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check DAR's competition here
UTZ vs PPC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while PPC trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ and PPC have similar daily volatility (4.32).Check PPC's competition here
UTZ vs CPB Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while CPB trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check CPB's competition here
UTZ vs INGR Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while INGR trades at $100.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check INGR's competition here
UTZ vs CAG Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while CAG trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -126.60. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check CAG's competition here
UTZ vs LW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while LW trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check LW's competition here
UTZ vs BRFS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRFS's competition here
UTZ vs LANC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check LANC's competition here
UTZ vs TWNK Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check TWNK's competition here
UTZ vs TWNKW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check TWNKW's competition here
UTZ vs POST Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while POST trades at $91.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check POST's competition here
UTZ vs MZTI Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MZTI trades at $108.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MZTI's competition here
UTZ vs CENT Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while CENT trades at $40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check CENT's competition here
UTZ vs FRPT Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FRPT trades at $50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FRPT's competition here
UTZ vs SOVO Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SOVO's competition here
UTZ vs CENTA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while CENTA trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check CENTA's competition here
UTZ vs KLG Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check KLG's competition here
UTZ vs FLO Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FLO trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FLO's competition here
UTZ vs JJSF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while JJSF trades at $76.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check JJSF's competition here
UTZ vs NOMD Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while NOMD trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check NOMD's competition here
UTZ vs THS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check THS's competition here
UTZ vs HLF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while HLF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check HLF's competition here
UTZ vs SMPL Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SMPL trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SMPL's competition here
UTZ vs BRBR Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRBR trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRBR's competition here
UTZ vs SENEA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 984.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SENEA trades at $147.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SENEA's competition here
UTZ vs SENEB Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 976M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SENEB trades at $148.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SENEB's competition here
UTZ vs JBSS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 886.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while JBSS trades at $76.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check JBSS's competition here
UTZ vs STKL Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check STKL's competition here
UTZ vs WEST Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 732.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while WEST trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check WEST's competition here
UTZ vs MAMA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 622M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MAMA trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 117.54. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MAMA's competition here
UTZ vs THRN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check THRN's competition here
UTZ vs BRCC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRCC trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRCC's competition here
UTZ vs BYND Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BYND trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BYND's competition here
UTZ vs LWAY Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 355.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while LWAY trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check LWAY's competition here
UTZ vs NATR Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while NATR trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check NATR's competition here
UTZ vs USNA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 334.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while USNA trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check USNA's competition here
UTZ vs BGS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 319.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BGS trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BGS's competition here
UTZ vs FREE Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FREE's competition here
UTZ vs WESTW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check WESTW's competition here
UTZ vs MMMB Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MMMB's competition here
UTZ vs LFVN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while LFVN trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check LFVN's competition here
UTZ vs PLIN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check PLIN's competition here
UTZ vs OFRM Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while OFRM trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -46.66. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check OFRM's competition here
UTZ vs FTLF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FTLF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FTLF's competition here
UTZ vs HAIN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while HAIN trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check HAIN's competition here
UTZ vs BRID Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRID trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRID's competition here
UTZ vs BOF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BOF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BOF's competition here
UTZ vs MITC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MITC's competition here
UTZ vs WYHG Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while WYHG trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check WYHG's competition here
UTZ vs LSF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while LSF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check LSF's competition here
UTZ vs BRLS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRLS trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRLS's competition here
UTZ vs CLXT Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check CLXT's competition here
UTZ vs HAPP Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check HAPP's competition here
UTZ vs DDC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while DDC trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check DDC's competition here
UTZ vs FARM Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FARM's competition here
UTZ vs JVA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while JVA trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check JVA's competition here
UTZ vs YGF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check YGF's competition here
UTZ vs ABVEW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while ABVEW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check ABVEW's competition here
UTZ vs ORIS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while ORIS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check ORIS's competition here
UTZ vs COOT Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while COOT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check COOT's competition here
UTZ vs NAII Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while NAII trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check NAII's competition here
UTZ vs MWYN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MWYN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MWYN's competition here
UTZ vs PLAG Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while PLAG trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check PLAG's competition here
UTZ vs TTCF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check TTCF's competition here
UTZ vs PETZ Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while PETZ trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check PETZ's competition here
UTZ vs BON Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BON trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BON's competition here
UTZ vs NUZE Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check NUZE's competition here
UTZ vs BTTR Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BTTR's competition here
UTZ vs HCWC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while HCWC trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check HCWC's competition here
UTZ vs ABVE Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while ABVE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check ABVE's competition here
UTZ vs ATPC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while ATPC trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check ATPC's competition here
UTZ vs CYAN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while CYAN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check CYAN's competition here
UTZ vs FREEW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FREEW's competition here
UTZ vs NCRA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while NCRA trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check NCRA's competition here
UTZ vs RGF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check RGF's competition here
UTZ vs IMG Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check IMG's competition here
UTZ vs FAMI Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while FAMI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check FAMI's competition here
UTZ vs SOWG Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SOWG trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SOWG's competition here
UTZ vs BRLSW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRLSW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRLSW's competition here
UTZ vs STKH Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 108.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while STKH trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check STKH's competition here
UTZ vs PAVS Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 55.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while PAVS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check PAVS's competition here
UTZ vs SNAXW Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SNAXW's competition here
UTZ vs BSFC Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 11.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BSFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSFC's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BSFC's competition here
UTZ vs SMFL Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SMFL's competition here
UTZ vs SNAX Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNAX's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SNAX's competition here
UTZ vs RIBT Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check RIBT's competition here
UTZ vs PF Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while PF trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check PF's competition here
UTZ vs SAFM Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check SAFM's competition here
UTZ vs BRCN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check BRCN's competition here
UTZ vs MJN Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while MJN trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check MJN's competition here
UTZ vs DTEA Comparison June 2026
UTZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UTZ stands at 601.6M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UTZ is priced at $7.07, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -67.95, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, UTZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UTZ is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTZ.Check DTEA's competition here