Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CENT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT | $43.00 | +1.93% | 2.7B | 15.70 | $2.75 | N/A |
| KHC | $22.59 | -2.63% | 27.1B | -4.70 | -$4.86 | +7.01% |
| JBS | $11.78 | -3.60% | 26.5B | 7.36 | $1.62 | +8.38% |
| GIS | $33.86 | +1.50% | 17.8B | 8.17 | $4.09 | +7.30% |
| HRL | $24.16 | -0.72% | 13.3B | 28.42 | $0.85 | +4.82% |
| MKC | $46.40 | -0.19% | 12.5B | 7.65 | $6.10 | +3.99% |
| MKC-V | $46.20 | +0.15% | 12.5B | 7.62 | $6.10 | +4.00% |
| SJM | $109.65 | -2.93% | 11.8B | -9.41 | -$11.78 | +3.97% |
| MICC | $16.30 | -4.57% | 10.3B | 29.95 | $0.56 | N/A |
| DAR | $52.33 | -2.71% | 8.5B | 38.90 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CENT vs KHC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while KHC trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check KHC's competition here
CENT vs JBS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while JBS trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check JBS's competition here
CENT vs GIS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while GIS trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check GIS's competition here
CENT vs HRL Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while HRL trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check HRL's competition here
CENT vs MKC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MKC trades at $46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MKC's competition here
CENT vs MKC-V Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MKC-V trades at $46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MKC-V's competition here
CENT vs SJM Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SJM trades at $109.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SJM's competition here
CENT vs MICC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MICC trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MICC's competition here
CENT vs DAR Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while DAR trades at $52.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check DAR's competition here
CENT vs PPC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while PPC trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check PPC's competition here
CENT vs CAG Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while CAG trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -132.00. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check CAG's competition here
CENT vs CPB Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while CPB trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check CPB's competition here
CENT vs LW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while LW trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check LW's competition here
CENT vs INGR Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while INGR trades at $97.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check INGR's competition here
CENT vs BRFS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRFS's competition here
CENT vs LANC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check LANC's competition here
CENT vs TWNK Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check TWNK's competition here
CENT vs TWNKW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check TWNKW's competition here
CENT vs POST Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while POST trades at $87.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check POST's competition here
CENT vs MZTI Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MZTI trades at $107.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MZTI's competition here
CENT vs FRPT Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FRPT trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FRPT's competition here
CENT vs CENTA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while CENTA trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check CENTA's competition here
CENT vs SOVO Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SOVO's competition here
CENT vs KLG Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check KLG's competition here
CENT vs FLO Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FLO trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FLO's competition here
CENT vs NOMD Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while NOMD trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check NOMD's competition here
CENT vs JJSF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while JJSF trades at $74.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check JJSF's competition here
CENT vs THS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check THS's competition here
CENT vs HLF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while HLF trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check HLF's competition here
CENT vs SMPL Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SMPL trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SMPL's competition here
CENT vs BRBR Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRBR trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRBR's competition here
CENT vs SENEB Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SENEB trades at $157.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SENEB's competition here
CENT vs SENEA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SENEA trades at $155.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SENEA's competition here
CENT vs JBSS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 912.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while JBSS trades at $79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check JBSS's competition here
CENT vs WEST Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 880.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while WEST trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check WEST's competition here
CENT vs STKL Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check STKL's competition here
CENT vs MAMA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 723.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MAMA trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 118.47. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MAMA's competition here
CENT vs UTZ Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 624.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while UTZ trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check UTZ's competition here
CENT vs THRN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check THRN's competition here
CENT vs BRCC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRCC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRCC's competition here
CENT vs LWAY Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while LWAY trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check LWAY's competition here
CENT vs BYND Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BYND trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BYND's competition here
CENT vs NATR Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 353.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while NATR trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check NATR's competition here
CENT vs USNA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 348.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while USNA trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check USNA's competition here
CENT vs BGS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BGS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BGS's competition here
CENT vs FREE Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FREE's competition here
CENT vs WESTW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check WESTW's competition here
CENT vs MMMB Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MMMB's competition here
CENT vs OFRM Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while OFRM trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -60.56. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check OFRM's competition here
CENT vs PLIN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check PLIN's competition here
CENT vs FTLF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FTLF trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FTLF's competition here
CENT vs ABVEW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while ABVEW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check ABVEW's competition here
CENT vs LFVN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while LFVN trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check LFVN's competition here
CENT vs BOF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BOF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BOF's competition here
CENT vs WYHG Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while WYHG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check WYHG's competition here
CENT vs BRID Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRID trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRID's competition here
CENT vs MITC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MITC's competition here
CENT vs HAIN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while HAIN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check HAIN's competition here
CENT vs LSF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while LSF trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check LSF's competition here
CENT vs BRLSW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRLSW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRLSW's competition here
CENT vs CLXT Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check CLXT's competition here
CENT vs HAPP Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check HAPP's competition here
CENT vs BRLS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRLS trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRLS's competition here
CENT vs FARM Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FARM's competition here
CENT vs DDC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while DDC trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check DDC's competition here
CENT vs YGF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check YGF's competition here
CENT vs JVA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while JVA trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check JVA's competition here
CENT vs ORIS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while ORIS trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check ORIS's competition here
CENT vs COOT Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while COOT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check COOT's competition here
CENT vs MWYN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MWYN trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MWYN's competition here
CENT vs NAII Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while NAII trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check NAII's competition here
CENT vs PETZ Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while PETZ trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check PETZ's competition here
CENT vs PLAG Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while PLAG trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check PLAG's competition here
CENT vs TTCF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check TTCF's competition here
CENT vs BON Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BON trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BON's competition here
CENT vs NUZE Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check NUZE's competition here
CENT vs BTTR Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BTTR's competition here
CENT vs ABVE Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while ABVE trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check ABVE's competition here
CENT vs HCWC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while HCWC trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check HCWC's competition here
CENT vs ATPC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while ATPC trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check ATPC's competition here
CENT vs SOWG Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SOWG trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SOWG's competition here
CENT vs FREEW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FREEW's competition here
CENT vs RGF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check RGF's competition here
CENT vs IMG Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check IMG's competition here
CENT vs FAMI Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while FAMI trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check FAMI's competition here
CENT vs NCRA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while NCRA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check NCRA's competition here
CENT vs STKH Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 74.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while STKH trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check STKH's competition here
CENT vs SNAXW Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SNAXW's competition here
CENT vs PAVS Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while PAVS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check PAVS's competition here
CENT vs LNCE Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while LNCE trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check LNCE's competition here
CENT vs VGFC Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check VGFC's competition here
CENT vs MJN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while MJN trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check MJN's competition here
CENT vs PF Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while PF trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check PF's competition here
CENT vs SAFM Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check SAFM's competition here
CENT vs BRCN Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check BRCN's competition here
CENT vs DTEA Comparison June 2026
CENT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENT is priced at $43.00, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CENT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENT is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENT.Check DTEA's competition here