Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | $26.77 | -2.87% | 6.4B | 6.07 | $4.41 | +7.58% |
| KHC | $23.47 | +4.45% | 27.2B | 9.00 | $2.55 | +6.95% |
| JBS | $12.03 | -1.39% | 26.7B | 7.34 | $1.64 | +8.19% |
| GIS | $35.39 | +1.70% | 18.9B | 10.60 | $3.34 | +6.97% |
| HRL | $26.02 | +1.84% | 14.3B | 18.45 | $1.41 | +4.56% |
| MKC-V | $48.87 | +1.54% | 13.1B | 15.48 | $3.16 | +3.86% |
| MKC | $48.42 | +1.73% | 13B | 15.27 | $3.17 | +3.84% |
| SJM | $112.50 | +0.77% | 12B | 12.29 | $9.15 | +3.92% |
| MICC | $17.21 | +1.06% | 10.5B | 14.12 | $1.22 | N/A |
| DAR | $53.07 | +0.80% | 8.4B | 31.59 | $1.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PPC vs KHC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while KHC trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check KHC's competition here
PPC vs JBS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while JBS trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check JBS's competition here
PPC vs GIS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while GIS trades at $35.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check GIS's competition here
PPC vs HRL Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while HRL trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check HRL's competition here
PPC vs MKC-V Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MKC-V trades at $48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MKC-V's competition here
PPC vs MKC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MKC trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MKC's competition here
PPC vs SJM Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SJM trades at $112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SJM's competition here
PPC vs MICC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MICC trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MICC's competition here
PPC vs DAR Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while DAR trades at $53.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check DAR's competition here
PPC vs CPB Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while CPB trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check CPB's competition here
PPC vs CAG Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while CAG trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check CAG's competition here
PPC vs LW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while LW trades at $44.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check LW's competition here
PPC vs INGR Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while INGR trades at $96.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check INGR's competition here
PPC vs BRFS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRFS's competition here
PPC vs LANC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check LANC's competition here
PPC vs TWNK Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check TWNK's competition here
PPC vs TWNKW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check TWNKW's competition here
PPC vs POST Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while POST trades at $89.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check POST's competition here
PPC vs MZTI Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MZTI trades at $112.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MZTI's competition here
PPC vs CENTA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while CENTA trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check CENTA's competition here
PPC vs CENT Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while CENT trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check CENT's competition here
PPC vs FRPT Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FRPT trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FRPT's competition here
PPC vs SOVO Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SOVO's competition here
PPC vs KLG Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check KLG's competition here
PPC vs FLO Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FLO trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FLO's competition here
PPC vs NOMD Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while NOMD trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check NOMD's competition here
PPC vs JJSF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while JJSF trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check JJSF's competition here
PPC vs BRBR Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRBR trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRBR's competition here
PPC vs HLF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while HLF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check HLF's competition here
PPC vs THS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check THS's competition here
PPC vs SENEB Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SENEB trades at $169.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SENEB's competition here
PPC vs SENEA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SENEA trades at $168.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SENEA's competition here
PPC vs SMPL Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SMPL trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SMPL's competition here
PPC vs JBSS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 992.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while JBSS trades at $84.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check JBSS's competition here
PPC vs WEST Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 949.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while WEST trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -23.17. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check WEST's competition here
PPC vs MAMA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 794.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MAMA trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MAMA's competition here
PPC vs STKL Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check STKL's competition here
PPC vs UTZ Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 638.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while UTZ trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check UTZ's competition here
PPC vs THRN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check THRN's competition here
PPC vs LWAY Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 463.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while LWAY trades at $30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check LWAY's competition here
PPC vs BRCC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 404.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRCC trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRCC's competition here
PPC vs USNA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while USNA trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check USNA's competition here
PPC vs NATR Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while NATR trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check NATR's competition here
PPC vs BYND Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BYND trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BYND's competition here
PPC vs BGS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BGS trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BGS's competition here
PPC vs FREE Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FREE's competition here
PPC vs WESTW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check WESTW's competition here
PPC vs OFRM Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while OFRM trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -42.21. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check OFRM's competition here
PPC vs MMMB Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MMMB's competition here
PPC vs PLIN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check PLIN's competition here
PPC vs FTLF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FTLF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FTLF's competition here
PPC vs ABVEW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while ABVEW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check ABVEW's competition here
PPC vs LFVN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while LFVN trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check LFVN's competition here
PPC vs BOF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BOF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BOF's competition here
PPC vs BRID Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRID trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRID's competition here
PPC vs MITC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MITC's competition here
PPC vs LSF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while LSF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check LSF's competition here
PPC vs HAIN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while HAIN trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check HAIN's competition here
PPC vs WYHG Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while WYHG trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 107.76. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check WYHG's competition here
PPC vs BRLSW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRLSW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRLSW's competition here
PPC vs CLXT Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check CLXT's competition here
PPC vs HAPP Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check HAPP's competition here
PPC vs BRLS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRLS trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRLS's competition here
PPC vs FARM Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FARM's competition here
PPC vs YGF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check YGF's competition here
PPC vs DDC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while DDC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check DDC's competition here
PPC vs JVA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while JVA trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check JVA's competition here
PPC vs MWYN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MWYN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MWYN's competition here
PPC vs COOT Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while COOT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check COOT's competition here
PPC vs NAII Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while NAII trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check NAII's competition here
PPC vs PLAG Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while PLAG trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check PLAG's competition here
PPC vs PETZ Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while PETZ trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check PETZ's competition here
PPC vs TTCF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check TTCF's competition here
PPC vs BON Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BON trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BON's competition here
PPC vs NUZE Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check NUZE's competition here
PPC vs ABVE Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while ABVE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check ABVE's competition here
PPC vs BTTR Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BTTR's competition here
PPC vs PAVS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while PAVS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check PAVS's competition here
PPC vs HCWC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while HCWC trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check HCWC's competition here
PPC vs ATPC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while ATPC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check ATPC's competition here
PPC vs FREEW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FREEW's competition here
PPC vs SOWG Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SOWG trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SOWG's competition here
PPC vs ORIS Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while ORIS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check ORIS's competition here
PPC vs RGF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check RGF's competition here
PPC vs IMG Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check IMG's competition here
PPC vs FAMI Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while FAMI trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is 2.32. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check FAMI's competition here
PPC vs NCRA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while NCRA trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check NCRA's competition here
PPC vs STKH Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 56K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while STKH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check STKH's competition here
PPC vs SNAXW Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SNAXW's competition here
PPC vs PF Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while PF trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check PF's competition here
PPC vs BRCN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check BRCN's competition here
PPC vs LNCE Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while LNCE trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check LNCE's competition here
PPC vs DTEA Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check DTEA's competition here
PPC vs SAFM Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check SAFM's competition here
PPC vs MJN Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while MJN trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check MJN's competition here
PPC vs VGFC Comparison June 2026
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $26.77, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.Check VGFC's competition here