Thacker and Company Limited
Thacker and Company Limited (THACKER.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (THACKER.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THACKER.BO | ₹970.55 | -6.09% | 1.1B | 5.48 | ₹187.47 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹917.80 | -2.30% | 5.8T | 32.23 | ₹29.00 | +0.60% |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹918.35 | -2.18% | 5.8T | 32.27 | ₹28.97 | +0.60% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹1,009.60 | -3.45% | 2T | 21.49 | ₹48.62 | +0.75% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹1,009.30 | -3.44% | 2T | 21.48 | ₹48.63 | +0.75% |
| PFC.NS | ₹469.80 | -0.28% | 1.6T | 6.15 | ₹76.42 | +3.53% |
| PFC.BO | ₹469.85 | -0.20% | 1.6T | 6.15 | ₹76.42 | +3.53% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,562.65 | -1.30% | 1.4T | 16.54 | ₹217.10 | +1.55% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,561.40 | -1.35% | 1.4T | 16.52 | ₹217.17 | +1.55% |
| IRFC.NS | ₹105.06 | +1.40% | 1.4T | 19.74 | ₹5.36 | +2.03% |
Stock Comparison
THACKER.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹917.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹918.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹1,009.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹1,009.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PFC.NS trades at ₹469.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PFC.BO trades at ₹469.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,562.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,561.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹105.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹105.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,543.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,542.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹376.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹376.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 736.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while LTF.NS trades at ₹292.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 653B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹680.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 652.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹680.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 544.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,867.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 541.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,864.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 417.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹297.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 400.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹204.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 400.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹204.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 394.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹137.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 394.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 371.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹420.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 95.62. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 371.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹420.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 95.73. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,574.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 297.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,574.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹292.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 62.64. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹292.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,243.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,241.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 198.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹420.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IIFL.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 198.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹420.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 180.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹184.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 180.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹183.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹61.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹484.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹484.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹95.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹320.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹319.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹152.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹44.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹257.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹74.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹74.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹196.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹195.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹182.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹181.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹116.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 95.84. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹116.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 94.84. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹167.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹212.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹223.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹223.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,519.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 56.17. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,519.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 56.02. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -30.15. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹108.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,313.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹70.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹70.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.49. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹171.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -105.45. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹170.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -100.97. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹157.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹116.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹185.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹108.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹49.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -403.17. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹234.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IITL.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IITL.BO trades at ₹184.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -74.15. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IITL.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs IITL.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while IITL.NS trades at ₹184.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 74.78. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check IITL.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
THACKER.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹1,090.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 84.12. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
THACKER.BO vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
THACKER.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, THACKER.BO stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, THACKER.BO is priced at ₹970.55, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
THACKER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -34.28. In terms of profitability, THACKER.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, THACKER.BO is more volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for THACKER.BO.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here