Loews Corporation
Loews Corporation (L&TFH.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | $107.69 | +0.98% | 22.3B | 13.51 | $7.97 | +0.23% |
| CB | $328.33 | +0.36% | 128.1B | 12.79 | $25.68 | +1.18% |
| PGR | $195.25 | +0.98% | 114.4B | 10.15 | $19.23 | +7.12% |
| TRV | $293.99 | +1.19% | 65.6B | 10.72 | $27.43 | +1.50% |
| ALL | $207.03 | +1.44% | 53.7B | 5.44 | $38.07 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PB | $25.64 | +0.47% | 53.4B | 2.13 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PH | $20.33 | +1.35% | 50.6B | 3.42 | $5.95 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| WRB | $65.99 | +1.09% | 25.1B | 14.83 | $4.45 | +2.82% |
| CINF | $158.41 | +0.48% | 24.7B | 10.45 | $15.16 | +2.24% |
Stock Comparison
L vs CB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while CB trades at $328.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CB's competition here
L vs PGR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while PGR trades at $195.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, L and PGR have similar daily volatility (1.80).Check PGR's competition here
L vs TRV Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while TRV trades at $293.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check TRV's competition here
L vs ALL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ALL trades at $207.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL's competition here
L vs ALL-PB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ALL-PB trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PB's competition here
L vs ALL-PH Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ALL-PH trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PH's competition here
L vs ALL-PG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PG's competition here
L vs WRB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while WRB trades at $65.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB's competition here
L vs CINF Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while CINF trades at $158.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CINF's competition here
L vs MKL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while MKL trades at $1,898.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MKL's competition here
L vs CNA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while CNA trades at $46.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNA's competition here
L vs AFG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFG trades at $129.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFG's competition here
L vs WRB-PE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while WRB-PE trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PE's competition here
L vs KNSL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while KNSL trades at $344.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KNSL's competition here
L vs AXS Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AXS trades at $101.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS's competition here
L vs AXS-PE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AXS-PE trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AXS-PE's competition here
L vs WRB-PF Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while WRB-PF trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PF's competition here
L vs ALL-PJ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ALL-PJ trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
L vs THG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while THG trades at $176.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check THG's competition here
L vs WRB-PG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while WRB-PG trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PG's competition here
L vs WRB-PH Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while WRB-PH trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WRB-PH's competition here
L vs WTM Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while WTM trades at $2,169.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check WTM's competition here
L vs RLI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while RLI trades at $58.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check RLI's competition here
L vs ALL-PI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ALL-PI trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ALL-PI's competition here
L vs MCY Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while MCY trades at $88.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MCY's competition here
L vs LMND Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while LMND trades at $61.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -27.44. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check LMND's competition here
L vs SIGI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while SIGI trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGI's competition here
L vs HGTY Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while HGTY trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY's competition here
L vs HGTY-WT Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
L vs AHL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL's competition here
L vs PLMR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while PLMR trades at $120.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PLMR's competition here
L vs AHL-PD Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AHL-PD trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -83.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PD's competition here
L vs SLDE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while SLDE trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SLDE's competition here
L vs HCI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while HCI trades at $153.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HCI's competition here
L vs SKWD Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while SKWD trades at $43.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SKWD's competition here
L vs AHL-PE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AHL-PE trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -83.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PE's competition here
L vs STC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while STC trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STC's competition here
L vs KMPR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while KMPR trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPR's competition here
L vs HMN Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while HMN trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HMN's competition here
L vs AFGB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFGB trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGB's competition here
L vs AFGD Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFGD trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGD's competition here
L vs AFGC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFGC trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGC's competition here
L vs AFGE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFGE trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFGE's competition here
L vs KMPB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while KMPB trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KMPB's competition here
L vs PRA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while PRA trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRA's competition here
L vs SAFT Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while SAFT trades at $73.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SAFT's competition here
L vs ARGO Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO's competition here
L vs SIGIP Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 971.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while SIGIP trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check SIGIP's competition here
L vs UFCS Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 959.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while UFCS trades at $37.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UFCS's competition here
L vs ASIC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 958M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ASIC trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ASIC's competition here
L vs MHLA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 952M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while MHLA trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MHLA's competition here
L vs UVE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while UVE trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UVE's competition here
L vs HRTG Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 809.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while HRTG trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HRTG's competition here
L vs BOW Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 734M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while BOW trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check BOW's competition here
L vs DGICB Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 653.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while DGICB trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICB's competition here
L vs DGICA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 626.9M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while DGICA trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check DGICA's competition here
L vs ROOT Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 594.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ROOT trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ROOT's competition here
L vs ACIC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ACIC trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ACIC's competition here
L vs GBLI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 395.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while GBLI trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLI's competition here
L vs AII Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AII trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AII's competition here
L vs UIHC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UIHC's competition here
L vs NODK Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while NODK trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NODK's competition here
L vs KINS Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while KINS trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check KINS's competition here
L vs PRHIZ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while PRHIZ trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHIZ's competition here
L vs CNFR Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFR's competition here
L vs CNFRZ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRZ's competition here
L vs PRHI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while PRHI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check PRHI's competition here
L vs UNAM Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check UNAM's competition here
L vs HALL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 155.7K. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while HALL trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check HALL's competition here
L vs ARGO-PA Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
L vs AFSI Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFSI's competition here
L vs GFZ Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GFZ's competition here
L vs MILE Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILE's competition here
L vs CNFRL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check CNFRL's competition here
L vs AHL-PC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AHL-PC's competition here
L vs GBLIL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check GBLIL's competition here
L vs MILEW Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check MILEW's competition here
L vs ENH Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check ENH's competition here
L vs FNHC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check FNHC's competition here
L vs NSEC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check NSEC's competition here
L vs AFHBL Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, L is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check AFHBL's competition here
L vs STFC Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check STFC's competition here
L vs Y Comparison April 2026
L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, L stands at 22.3B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, L is priced at $107.69, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
L currently has a P/E ratio of 13.51, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, L is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for L.Check Y's competition here