Capri Global Capital Limited
Capri Global Capital Limited (CGCL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGCL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGCL.NS | ₹190.79 | +0.79% | 183.6B | 18.85 | ₹10.12 | +0.11% |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹930.20 | -1.24% | 5.8T | 30.48 | ₹30.52 | +0.59% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹930.20 | -1.25% | 5.8T | 32.08 | ₹29.00 | +0.59% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹952.15 | -1.02% | 1.8T | 17.88 | ₹53.26 | +0.81% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹951.65 | -1.06% | 1.8T | 17.88 | ₹53.22 | +0.81% |
| PFC.NS | ₹433.70 | -1.18% | 1.4T | 5.53 | ₹78.49 | +3.79% |
| PFC.BO | ₹433.55 | -1.28% | 1.4T | 5.52 | ₹78.48 | +3.79% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,331.50 | -0.68% | 1.3T | 12.63 | ₹263.74 | +0.89% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,331.35 | -0.66% | 1.3T | 12.63 | ₹263.79 | +0.89% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,568.10 | -1.40% | 1.3T | 25.36 | ₹61.84 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
CGCL.NS vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹930.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹930.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹952.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹951.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PFC.NS trades at ₹433.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PFC.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PFC.BO trades at ₹433.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PFC.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,331.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,331.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,568.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,567.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IRFC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹99.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹99.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 889B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹337.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 889B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹337.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 708.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while LTF.NS trades at ₹282.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check LTF.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 598.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹629.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 598.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹628.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 479.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,315.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 477.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,312.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 424B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 413.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹206.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 413.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹206.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 363.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹129.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 363.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹129.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 347.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹396.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.98. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 346.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.89. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 310.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,653.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 310.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,652.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 279.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹330.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 279.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹330.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,298.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 154.38. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,298.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 154.55. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹474.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 183.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹191.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 173.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹64.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IFCI.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹64.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹455.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹455.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹91.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹91.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹161.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹161.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹306.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹306.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹281.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹49.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹72.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹72.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SGFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹578.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SGFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹577.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹178.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹212.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹211.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SATIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹222.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹222.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹175.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is 173.68. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹175.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is 175.25. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹125.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 101.87. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹125.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 102.52. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PFS.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PFS.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹261.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹261.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,750.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 65.38. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,750.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 65.12. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹198.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -25.04. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹198.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹354.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹98.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,392.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,392.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹167.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -106.27. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹162.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -103.43. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹63.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹63.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹139.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹114.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹194.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹243.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹241.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹107.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -342.08. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
CGCL.NS vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹68.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -62.57. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹1,013.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 80.54. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
CGCL.NS vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGCL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGCL.NS stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGCL.NS is priced at ₹190.79, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹171.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.85, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, CGCL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGCL.NS is less volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGCL.NS.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here