Satin Creditcare Network Limited
Satin Creditcare Network Limited (SATIN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SATIN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATIN.NS | ₹193.78 | +2.92% | 21.3B | 11.10 | ₹17.45 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹980.75 | +2.31% | 6.1T | 32.16 | ₹30.50 | +0.58% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹980.65 | +2.32% | 6.1T | 33.82 | ₹29.00 | +0.58% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹1,004.10 | +4.12% | 1.9T | 18.86 | ₹53.24 | +0.81% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹1,004.00 | +4.10% | 1.9T | 18.86 | ₹53.24 | +0.81% |
| PFC.NS | ₹463.90 | +1.53% | 1.5T | 6.07 | ₹76.44 | +3.64% |
| PFC.BO | ₹463.55 | +1.47% | 1.5T | 6.07 | ₹76.43 | +3.64% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,711.90 | +3.29% | 1.5T | 29.77 | ₹57.51 | +0.12% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,710.95 | +3.28% | 1.5T | 29.78 | ₹57.45 | +0.12% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,536.70 | +2.71% | 1.4T | 16.29 | ₹217.08 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
SATIN.NS vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 6.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹980.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 6.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹980.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹1,004.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹1,004.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PFC.NS trades at ₹463.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PFC.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PFC.BO trades at ₹463.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PFC.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,711.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,710.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,536.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,533.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IRFC.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹106.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹106.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 945.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹359.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 945.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹359.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 752.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while LTF.NS trades at ₹300.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check LTF.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 618.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹649.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 618.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹649.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 522B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,698.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 518B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,699.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 454.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹327.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 445.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹222.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 444.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹222.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 395.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹451.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 66.43. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 395.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹451.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 383.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹136.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 383.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹136.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,733.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 325.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,732.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 262.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹309.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 262.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹309.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 235.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,471.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 235.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,471.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹455.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 193.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹455.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 193.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹200.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹200.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IFCI.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹61.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 88.54. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹61.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹484.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹484.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹94.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹342.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹152.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹286.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹48.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹80.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹80.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹214.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -11.95. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹224.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹224.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹219.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹218.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹194.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹115.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 94.19. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹115.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 94.85. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PFS.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PFS.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹268.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹268.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,793.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 67.04. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,787.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 66.51. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹208.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -12.63. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹208.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹389.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -29.70. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹110.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹110.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,732.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,722.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.77. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.34. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -104.27. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹168.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -101.95. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹160.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹34.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹127.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹115.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹190.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹235.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹235.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹47.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -399.25. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹1,084.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 86.41. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹172.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here
SATIN.NS vs IITL.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while IITL.NS trades at ₹161.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.63. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check IITL.NS's competition here
SATIN.NS vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison May 2026
SATIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIN.NS stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIN.NS is priced at ₹193.78, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹172.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, SATIN.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIN.NS is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIN.NS.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here