Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited
Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited (IRFC.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRFC.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRFC.BO | ₹99.20 | -1.24% | 1.3T | 18.53 | ₹5.36 | +2.12% |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹931.15 | -1.14% | 5.8T | 30.48 | ₹30.52 | +0.60% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹930.95 | -1.17% | 5.8T | 32.08 | ₹29.00 | +0.60% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹963.20 | +0.13% | 1.8T | 17.88 | ₹53.26 | +0.82% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹962.45 | +0.06% | 1.8T | 17.88 | ₹53.22 | +0.82% |
| PFC.NS | ₹433.50 | -1.23% | 1.4T | 5.53 | ₹78.49 | +3.84% |
| PFC.BO | ₹433.55 | -1.28% | 1.4T | 5.52 | ₹78.48 | +3.84% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,306.90 | -1.42% | 1.3T | 12.63 | ₹263.74 | +0.90% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,307.95 | -1.36% | 1.3T | 12.63 | ₹263.79 | +0.90% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,578.75 | -0.73% | 1.3T | 25.36 | ₹61.84 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
IRFC.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹931.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹930.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹963.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹962.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PFC.NS trades at ₹433.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PFC.BO trades at ₹433.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,306.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,307.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,578.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,579.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 889B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹339.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 889B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹339.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 708.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while LTF.NS trades at ₹281.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 598.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹625.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 598.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹625.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 479.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,352.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 477.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,354.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 424B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹305.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 413.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹206.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 413.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹206.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 363.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹130.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 363.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹130.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 347.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹394.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.98. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 346.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹394.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.89. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 310.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,636.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 310.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,636.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 279.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 279.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹328.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,288.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 154.38. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,289.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 154.55. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹477.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹478.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 183.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹189.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 173.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹454.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹454.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹91.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹90.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹162.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹162.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹315.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹315.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹282.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹73.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹73.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SGFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹570.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SGFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹570.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹177.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹230.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹230.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹221.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹221.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹176.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is 173.68. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹176.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is 175.25. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹126.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 101.87. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹126.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 102.52. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹259.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹262.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,803.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 65.38. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,801.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 65.12. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹201.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -25.04. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹201.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹352.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹97.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,349.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,387.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹165.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -106.27. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹161.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -103.43. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹60.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹140.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹112.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is more volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹242.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹242.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹108.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -342.08. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
IRFC.BO vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -62.57. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹995.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 80.54. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
IRFC.BO vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison May 2026
IRFC.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRFC.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRFC.BO is priced at ₹99.20, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹191.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.53, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, IRFC.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRFC.BO is less volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRFC.BO.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here