
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See IIFL.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for IIFL.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIFL.NS | ₹600.60 | -1.16% | 255.4B | 12.15 | ₹49.45 | +0.67% |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹1,034.50 | -0.86% | 6.4T | 31.59 | ₹32.75 | +0.58% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹1,034.20 | -1.13% | 6.4T | 31.68 | ₹32.65 | +0.58% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹1,028.60 | -0.91% | 2.4T | 19.72 | ₹52.17 | +1.05% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹1,028.00 | -0.96% | 2.1T | 19.81 | ₹51.88 | +1.05% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,845.90 | -0.70% | 1.6T | 27.27 | ₹67.70 | +0.11% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,845.00 | -0.22% | 1.6T | 27.27 | ₹67.65 | +0.11% |
| TATACAP.NS | ₹362.90 | -0.07% | 1.5T | 30.85 | ₹11.76 | N/A |
| TATACAP.BO | ₹362.80 | -0.04% | 1.5T | 30.84 | ₹11.76 | N/A |
| PFC.BO | ₹353.25 | +0.13% | 1.2T | 5.47 | ₹64.63 | +5.30% |
Stock Comparison
Bajaj Finance Limited (NSE: BAJFINANCE.NS)
IIFL.NS vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 6.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹1,034.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
Bajaj Finance Limited (BSE: BAJFINANCE.BO)
IIFL.NS vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 6.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹1,034.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
Shriram Finance Limited (NSE: SHRIRAMFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹1,028.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
Shriram Finance Limited (BSE: SHRIRAMFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹1,028.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited (NSE: CHOLAFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,845.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited (BSE: CHOLAFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
Tata Capital Ltd. (NSE: TATACAP.NS)
IIFL.NS vs TATACAP.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, TATACAP.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while TATACAP.NS trades at ₹362.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TATACAP.NS's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACAP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to TATACAP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check TATACAP.NS's competition here
Tata Capital Limited (BSE: TATACAP.BO)
IIFL.NS vs TATACAP.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, TATACAP.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while TATACAP.BO trades at ₹362.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TATACAP.BO's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACAP.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to TATACAP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check TATACAP.BO's competition here
Power Finance Corporation Limited (BSE: PFC.BO)
IIFL.NS vs PFC.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while PFC.BO trades at ₹353.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check PFC.BO's competition here
Power Finance Corporation Limited (NSE: PFC.NS)
IIFL.NS vs PFC.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while PFC.NS trades at ₹353.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check PFC.NS's competition here
Muthoot Finance Limited (NSE: MUTHOOTFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹2,792.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
Muthoot Finance Limited (BSE: MUTHOOTFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹2,794.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited (NSE: IRFC.NS)
IIFL.NS vs IRFC.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹81.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited (BSE: IRFC.BO)
IIFL.NS vs IRFC.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹81.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
REC Limited (BSE: RECLTD.BO)
IIFL.NS vs RECLTD.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 823.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹312.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
REC Limited (NSE: RECLTD.NS)
IIFL.NS vs RECLTD.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 823.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹312.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
L&T Finance Ltd (NSE: LTF.NS)
IIFL.NS vs LTF.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 774.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while LTF.NS trades at ₹309.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check LTF.NS's competition here
SBI Cards and Payment Services Limited (BSE: SBICARD.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SBICARD.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 624.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹656.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
SBI Cards and Payment Services Limited (NSE: SBICARD.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SBICARD.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 623.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹655.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
Hdb Financial Services L (NSE: HDBFS.NS)
IIFL.NS vs HDBFS.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, HDBFS.NS has a market cap of 555.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while HDBFS.NS trades at ₹669.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HDBFS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HDBFS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to HDBFS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check HDBFS.NS's competition here
HDB Financial Services Limited (BSE: HDBFS.BO)
IIFL.NS vs HDBFS.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, HDBFS.BO has a market cap of 555.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while HDBFS.BO trades at ₹668.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HDBFS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HDBFS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to HDBFS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check HDBFS.BO's competition here
Sundaram Finance Limited (BSE: SUNDARMFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 523.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,714.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
Sundaram Finance Limited (NSE: SUNDARMFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 519.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,710.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (BSE: M&MFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs M&MFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, M&MFIN.BO has a market cap of 496.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while M&MFIN.BO trades at ₹355.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas M&MFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to M&MFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check M&MFIN.BO's competition here
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (NSE: M&MFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 494.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹356.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
L&T Finance Holdings Limited (NSE: L&TFH.NS)
IIFL.NS vs L&TFH.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (BSE: MMFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs MMFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
Poonawalla Fincorp Limited (BSE: POONAWALLA.BO)
IIFL.NS vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 391.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 46.90. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
Poonawalla Fincorp Limited (NSE: POONAWALLA.NS)
IIFL.NS vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 389.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹445.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 46.82. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited (NSE: HUDCO.NS)
IIFL.NS vs HUDCO.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 345.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹172.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited (BSE: HUDCO.BO)
IIFL.NS vs HUDCO.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 345.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹172.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited (BSE: IREDA.BO)
IIFL.NS vs IREDA.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 314.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd. (NSE: IREDA.NS)
IIFL.NS vs IREDA.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 313.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹111.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
Manappuram Finance Limited (BSE: MANAPPURAM.BO)
IIFL.NS vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 309.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
Manappuram Finance Limited (NSE: MANAPPURAM.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 309B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
Cholamandalam Financial Holdings Limited (NSE: CHOLAHLDNG.NS)
IIFL.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 287B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,528.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
Cholamandalam Financial Holdings Limited (BSE: CHOLAHLDNG.BO)
IIFL.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 286.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,525.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
Capri Global Capital Limited (BSE: CGCL.BO)
IIFL.NS vs CGCL.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 256B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹266.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
Capri Global Capital Limited (NSE: CGCL.NS)
IIFL.NS vs CGCL.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 255.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IIFL Finance Ltd. (BSE: IIFL.BO)
IIFL.NS vs IIFL.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 255.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹599.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
CreditAccess Grameen Limited (BSE: CREDITACC.BO)
IIFL.NS vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 228.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
CreditAccess Grameen Limited (NSE: CREDITACC.NS)
IIFL.NS vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 228.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,424.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IFCI Limited (BSE: IFCI.BO)
IIFL.NS vs IFCI.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 221.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹82.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 123.18. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IFCI Limited (NSE: IFCI.NS)
IIFL.NS vs IFCI.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 221.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹82.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 122.82. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
Five-Star Business Finance Limited (BSE: FIVESTAR.BO)
IIFL.NS vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹550.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
Five-Star Business Finance Limited (NSE: FIVESTAR.NS)
IIFL.NS vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹551.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
Shriram City Union Finance Limited (NSE: SHRIRAMCIT.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
SBFC Finance Limited (NSE: SBFC.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SBFC.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹98.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
SBFC Finance Limited (BSE: SBFC.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SBFC.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹98.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
Paisalo Digital Limited (BSE: PAISALO.BO)
IIFL.NS vs PAISALO.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹84.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
Paisalo Digital Limited (NSE: PAISALO.NS)
IIFL.NS vs PAISALO.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹84.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
Ujjivan Financial Services Limited (NSE: UJJIVAN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
Ujjivan Financial Services Limited (BSE: UJJIVAN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited (NSE: TFCILTD.NS)
IIFL.NS vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹141.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 52.99. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited (BSE: TFCILTD.BO)
IIFL.NS vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹140.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 52.64. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
Fedbank Financial Services Limited (NSE: FEDFINA.NS)
IIFL.NS vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹158.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
Fedbank Financial Services Limited (BSE: FEDFINA.BO)
IIFL.NS vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹158.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
Onemi Technology Solutions Limited (BSE: KISSHT.BO)
IIFL.NS vs KISSHT.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, KISSHT.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while KISSHT.BO trades at ₹328.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KISSHT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KISSHT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to KISSHT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check KISSHT.BO's competition here
Onemi Technology Solutions Limited (NSE: KISSHT.NS)
IIFL.NS vs KISSHT.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, KISSHT.NS has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while KISSHT.NS trades at ₹328.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KISSHT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KISSHT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to KISSHT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check KISSHT.NS's competition here
MAS Financial Services Limited (NSE: MASFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MASFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹295.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
MAS Financial Services Limited (BSE: MASFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs MASFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹295.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
Northern Arc Capital Ltd (NSE: NORTHARC.NS)
IIFL.NS vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
Equitas Holdings Limited (NSE: EQUITAS.NS)
IIFL.NS vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IndoStar Capital Finance Limited (BSE: INDOSTAR.BO)
IIFL.NS vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹246.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IndoStar Capital Finance Limited (NSE: INDOSTAR.NS)
IIFL.NS vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹244.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
SG Finserve Ltd. (BSE: SGFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SGFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹661.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
SG Finserve Ltd. (NSE: SGFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SGFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹660.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
Muthoot Microfin Ltd (NSE: MUTHOOTMF.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹196.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
Dhani Services Limited (BSE: DHANI.BO)
IIFL.NS vs DHANI.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
Fusion Micro Finance Limited (NSE: FUSION.NS)
IIFL.NS vs FUSION.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹189.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
Fusion Micro Finance Limited (BSE: FUSION.BO)
IIFL.NS vs FUSION.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹189.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -41.06. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
Mufin Green Finance Limited (NSE: MUFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MUFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹134.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 86.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
Mufin Green Finance Limited (BSE: MUFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs MUFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹134.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 86.74. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
Satin Creditcare Network Limited (BSE: SATIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SATIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹216.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
Satin Creditcare Network Limited (NSE: SATIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SATIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹216.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
Arman Financial Services Limited (BSE: ARMANFIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹2,016.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
Arman Financial Services Limited (NSE: ARMANFIN.NS)
IIFL.NS vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹2,011.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
PTC India Financial Services Limited (BSE: PFS.BO)
IIFL.NS vs PFS.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while PFS.BO trades at ₹27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check PFS.BO's competition here
PTC India Financial Services Limited (NSE: PFS.NS)
IIFL.NS vs PFS.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while PFS.NS trades at ₹27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check PFS.NS's competition here
Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited (NSE: SPANDANA.NS)
IIFL.NS vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹235.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited (BSE: SPANDANA.BO)
IIFL.NS vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹235.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
One Mobikwik Systems Limited (NSE: MOBIKWIK.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹209.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -303.91. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
One Mobikwik Systems Limited (BSE: MOBIKWIK.BO)
IIFL.NS vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹209.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -299.36. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
Ashika Global Securities Limited (BSE: ASHIKA.BO)
IIFL.NS vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.44. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
UGRO Capital Limited (NSE: UGROCAP.NS)
IIFL.NS vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹83.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
Vardhman Holdings Limited (NSE: VHL.NS)
IIFL.NS vs VHL.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,447.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here
Vardhman Holdings Limited (BSE: VHL.BO)
IIFL.NS vs VHL.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here
UGRO Capital Limited (BSE: UGROCAP.BO)
IIFL.NS vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹83.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
Finkurve Financial Services Limited (BSE: FINKURVE.BO)
IIFL.NS vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹74.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.46. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
Finkurve Financial Services Ltd (NSE: FINKURVE.NS)
IIFL.NS vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹72.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
Capital India Finance Limited (BSE: CIFL.BO)
IIFL.NS vs CIFL.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
Capital India Finance Ltd. (NSE: CIFL.NS)
IIFL.NS vs CIFL.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
India Finsec Limited (BSE: IFINSEC.BO)
IIFL.NS vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹249.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
Laxmi India Finance Limited (NSE: LAXMIINDIA.NS)
IIFL.NS vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹129.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
Ecos (India) Mobility & Hospitality Ltd. (NSE: ECOSMOBLTY.NS)
IIFL.NS vs ECOSMOBLTY.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, ECOSMOBLTY.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while ECOSMOBLTY.NS trades at ₹111.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ECOSMOBLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECOSMOBLTY.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to ECOSMOBLTY.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check ECOSMOBLTY.NS's competition here
Manba Finance Ltd. (NSE: MANBA.NS)
IIFL.NS vs MANBA.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹132.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
Niyogin Fintech Limited (BSE: NIYOGIN.BO)
IIFL.NS vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹53.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -984.74. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
CSL Finance Limited (BSE: CSLFINANCE.BO)
IIFL.NS vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹219.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
CSL Finance Limited (NSE: CSLFINANCE.NS)
IIFL.NS vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison September 2026
IIFL Finance Ltd. (NSE: IIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.NS stands at 255.4B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.NS is priced at ₹600.60 on the NSE, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹220.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, IIFL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.NS is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here