Industrial Investment Trust Limited
Industrial Investment Trust Limited (IITL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IITL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IITL.BO | ₹168.00 | +5.03% | 3.8B | -66.67 | -₹2.52 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹896.15 | -0.89% | 5.6T | 29.40 | ₹30.48 | +0.62% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹896.15 | -0.87% | 5.6T | 30.90 | ₹29.00 | +0.62% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹920.55 | -1.06% | 1.7T | 17.30 | ₹53.22 | +0.84% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹920.45 | -1.06% | 1.7T | 17.30 | ₹53.22 | +0.84% |
| PFC.BO | ₹446.10 | +1.23% | 1.5T | 5.84 | ₹76.43 | +3.78% |
| PFC.NS | ₹446.00 | +1.20% | 1.5T | 5.84 | ₹76.40 | +3.78% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,507.85 | +4.71% | 1.4T | 16.16 | ₹217.12 | +0.89% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,506.40 | +4.56% | 1.4T | 16.14 | ₹217.29 | +0.89% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,574.60 | +0.87% | 1.3T | 27.38 | ₹57.51 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
IITL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹896.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹896.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹920.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹920.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PFC.BO trades at ₹446.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PFC.NS trades at ₹446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,507.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,506.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,574.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,574.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹101.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹101.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 912.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹346.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 912.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹346.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 706.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while LTF.NS trades at ₹281.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 604.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹634.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 603.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹634.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 504.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,538.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 499.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,534.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 444.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹320.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 439.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹219.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 439.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹219.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 367.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹419.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 61.63. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 367B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹419.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 61.56. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 360.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹128.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 360.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹128.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 319.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,702.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 319.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,699.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹309.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹309.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,334.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 159.25. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 213.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,333.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 158.03. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 197.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹464.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹463.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 177.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹184.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 177.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹184.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹64.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 96.96. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹64.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 43.58. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 137.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹467.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹466.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹91.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹91.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹325.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹324.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹151.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹150.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹289.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹186.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹201.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹201.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹208.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹208.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹225.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹225.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹112.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 92.27. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹112.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 92.05. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹266.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,801.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 67.06. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹265.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,800.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 67.16. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹197.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹196.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹377.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -28.76. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹99.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹99.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,604.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,601.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹70.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.89. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹174.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -106.03. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹163.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -99.07. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹145.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹113.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹191.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹226.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹227.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -374.92. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -63.90. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹1,030.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 82.22. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
IITL.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs IITL.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while IITL.NS trades at ₹167.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is less volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check IITL.NS's competition here
IITL.BO vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison May 2026
IITL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IITL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IITL.BO is priced at ₹168.00, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹168.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, IITL.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IITL.BO is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IITL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here