IIFL Finance Ltd.
IIFL Finance Ltd. (IIFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IIFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIFL.BO | ₹464.50 | +0.35% | 189.2B | 11.48 | ₹38.76 | +0.90% |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹902.35 | -3.60% | 5.6T | 29.67 | ₹30.48 | +0.62% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹905.40 | -3.28% | 5.6T | 31.17 | ₹29.00 | +0.62% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹929.70 | -4.74% | 1.8T | 17.49 | ₹53.21 | +0.84% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹930.70 | -4.58% | 1.8T | 17.48 | ₹53.22 | +0.84% |
| PFC.NS | ₹443.55 | -1.10% | 1.5T | 5.77 | ₹76.40 | +3.78% |
| PFC.BO | ₹442.20 | -1.36% | 1.5T | 5.77 | ₹76.43 | +3.78% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,467.30 | +0.85% | 1.3T | 15.43 | ₹217.29 | +0.89% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,472.90 | +1.09% | 1.3T | 15.43 | ₹217.06 | +0.89% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,584.90 | -2.44% | 1.3T | 27.14 | ₹57.51 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
IIFL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹902.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹905.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹929.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹930.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PFC.NS trades at ₹443.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PFC.BO trades at ₹442.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,467.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,472.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,584.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,588.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹101.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹101.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 907B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹346.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 906.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹346.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 702.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while LTF.NS trades at ₹282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 594.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 594.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹628.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 511.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,589.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 506.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,581.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 454.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹326.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 438.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹221.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 438.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹220.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 369.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹422.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 369.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹423.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 62.03. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 350.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹128.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 350.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹128.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 322.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,722.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 321.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,721.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 248.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹306.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 248B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹305.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,364.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 164.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 222.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,360.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 165.97. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 189.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 179.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹184.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹184.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹65.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹65.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 88.51. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹462.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 138.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹461.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹91.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹331.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹149.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹149.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹289.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹187.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹202.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹202.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹207.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹233.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹229.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹112.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹113.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 92.54. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,819.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,836.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 66.03. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹266.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹265.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹198.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹198.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹381.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -29.15. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹100.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,584.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹68.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹69.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹170.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -102.42. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹164.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -98.79. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹147.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹112.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹228.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹229.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹45.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -375.00. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹70.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -63.75. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹1,044.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 82.12. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IITL.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IITL.NS trades at ₹162.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.49. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IITL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IITL.BO Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while IITL.BO trades at ₹161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -63.47. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IITL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison May 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 189.2B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹464.50, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹171.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.48, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here