IIFL Finance Ltd.
IIFL Finance Ltd. (IIFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IIFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIFL.BO | ₹474.35 | +0.94% | 198.1B | 15.62 | ₹29.83 | +0.86% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹908.95 | -0.45% | 5.6T | 31.25 | ₹29.00 | +0.62% |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹909.50 | -0.40% | 5.6T | 31.29 | ₹28.95 | +0.62% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹1,037.40 | +1.61% | 1.9T | 21.04 | ₹48.60 | +0.76% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹1,038.30 | +1.70% | 1.9T | 21.04 | ₹48.60 | +0.76% |
| PFC.BO | ₹465.15 | +4.60% | 1.5T | 6.01 | ₹76.42 | +3.63% |
| PFC.NS | ₹464.55 | +4.45% | 1.5T | 6.01 | ₹76.41 | +3.63% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,545.80 | -1.45% | 1.4T | 16.47 | ₹217.30 | +0.73% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,544.00 | -1.48% | 1.4T | 16.47 | ₹217.25 | +0.73% |
| IRFC.NS | ₹104.88 | +3.11% | 1.3T | 19.26 | ₹5.36 | +2.03% |
Stock Comparison
IIFL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹908.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹909.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹1,037.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹1,038.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while PFC.BO trades at ₹465.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while PFC.NS trades at ₹464.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,545.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,544.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹104.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,574.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,577.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 959B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹375.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 958.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹376.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 702.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while LTF.NS trades at ₹286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 652.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹696.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 652.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹695.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 555.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹5,002.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 550.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹5,014.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 413.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹298.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 387.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹195.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 387.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 363.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹133.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 363.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 331B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 91.52. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 330.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹410.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 91.29. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 297.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,628.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 297.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,624.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹269.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 57.17. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹269.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 57.17. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 198.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 198.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹474.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 197.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹181.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 178.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹61.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹471.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹96.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹97.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹315.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹315.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹150.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹148.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹71.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹219.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹170.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹170.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while PFS.BO trades at ₹31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while PFS.NS trades at ₹31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹112.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 91.89. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹112.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 91.63. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹176.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹175.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,544.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 57.69. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,547.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 57.63. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹227.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹227.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹204.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹204.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹357.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -26.97. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹115.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹114.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,395.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,360.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹72.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.79. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹73.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹170.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -99.64. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹168.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -99.39. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹120.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹112.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹244.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -370.17. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹989.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 78.92. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IITL.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IITL.NS trades at ₹166.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 67.21. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is less volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IITL.NS's competition here
IIFL.BO vs IITL.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while IITL.BO trades at ₹165.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -64.98. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check IITL.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹172.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here
IIFL.BO vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison April 2026
IIFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIFL.BO stands at 198.1B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIFL.BO is priced at ₹474.35, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹171.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.62, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, IIFL.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIFL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here