UGRO Capital Limited
UGRO Capital Limited (UGROCAP.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UGROCAP.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGROCAP.BO | ₹99.85 | -0.05% | 12.4B | 7.58 | ₹13.18 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹941.90 | +2.77% | 5.9T | 30.86 | ₹30.52 | +0.59% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹942.00 | +2.80% | 5.9T | 32.48 | ₹29.00 | +0.59% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹961.95 | +2.23% | 1.8T | 18.06 | ₹53.26 | +0.81% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹961.85 | +2.20% | 1.8T | 18.07 | ₹53.22 | +0.81% |
| PFC.BO | ₹439.15 | +2.01% | 1.4T | 5.59 | ₹78.49 | +3.79% |
| PFC.NS | ₹438.90 | +1.94% | 1.4T | 5.59 | ₹78.49 | +3.79% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,591.00 | +3.33% | 1.4T | 25.70 | ₹61.90 | +0.13% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,590.30 | +3.21% | 1.4T | 25.72 | ₹61.84 | +0.13% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,354.40 | +1.75% | 1.3T | 12.72 | ₹263.74 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
UGROCAP.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.9T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹941.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.9T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹961.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹961.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PFC.BO trades at ₹439.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PFC.NS trades at ₹438.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,590.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,354.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,353.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹100.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹100.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 901.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹342.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 901.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹342.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 699.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while LTF.NS trades at ₹279.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 599.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹630.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 599.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹630.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 486.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,379.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 483.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,385.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 428.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹308.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 416.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹207.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 415.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹207.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹129.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 364.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹129.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 349.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹398.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 349.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹398.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.32. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 305.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,627.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 305.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,624.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 275.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹325.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 275.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹325.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,304.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 155.35. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 208.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,303.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 155.03. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹481.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 204.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹481.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹189.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 182.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹189.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹61.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹61.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 89.49. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO and IFCI.NS have similar daily volatility (2.63).Check IFCI.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹456.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹456.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹93.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹93.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹164.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹164.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹305.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹286.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹49.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹73.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹73.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SGFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹579.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SGFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹578.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹178.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹212.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹210.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹216.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹216.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹176.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is 172.91. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹176.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is 172.70. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹123.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 101.48. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹123.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 100.36. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹261.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹261.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,718.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 63.92. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,717.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 64.13. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹191.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹191.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -24.14. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹367.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹99.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,469.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,467.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹167.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -106.27. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹65.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹164.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -103.80. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹140.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹114.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹192.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹239.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹107.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹239.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -358.17. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹990.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 78.85. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here
UGROCAP.BO vs IITL.BO Comparison May 2026
UGROCAP.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.BO stands at 12.4B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.BO is priced at ₹99.85, while IITL.BO trades at ₹166.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UGROCAP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -66.03. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.BO is less volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.BO.Check IITL.BO's competition here