IFCI Limited
IFCI Limited (IFCI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IFCI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFCI.NS | ₹61.75 | +1.20% | 163.7B | 88.03 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹941.90 | +3.77% | 5.7T | 30.05 | ₹30.50 | +0.61% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹942.00 | +3.77% | 5.7T | 31.60 | ₹29.00 | +0.61% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹961.85 | +5.14% | 1.8T | 17.69 | ₹53.21 | +0.83% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹961.95 | +5.16% | 1.8T | 17.66 | ₹53.28 | +0.83% |
| PFC.NS | ₹438.90 | +1.83% | 1.4T | 5.49 | ₹78.49 | +3.87% |
| PFC.BO | ₹439.15 | +1.95% | 1.4T | 5.49 | ₹78.48 | +3.87% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,353.45 | +2.48% | 1.3T | 12.50 | ₹263.76 | +0.91% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,354.40 | +2.50% | 1.3T | 12.50 | ₹263.78 | +0.91% |
| CHOLAFIN.BO | ₹1,590.30 | +5.70% | 1.3T | 24.93 | ₹61.81 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
IFCI.NS vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹941.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹961.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹961.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PFC.NS trades at ₹438.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PFC.BO trades at ₹439.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,353.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,354.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,590.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IRFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹100.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IRFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹100.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs RECLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 887.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹342.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs RECLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 886.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹342.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs LTF.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 676.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while LTF.NS trades at ₹279.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check LTF.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBICARD.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 590.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹630.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBICARD.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 590.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹630.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 498.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,379.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 495.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,385.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 416.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹308.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HUDCO.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 411.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹207.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HUDCO.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 410.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹207.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs L&TFH.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MMFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IREDA.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 362.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹129.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IREDA.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 362.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹129.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 350B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹398.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 349.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹398.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 300.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,627.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 300.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,624.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 274.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹325.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 274.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹325.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,303.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 151.56. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,304.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 151.90. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹481.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹481.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹189.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CGCL.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹189.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IFCI.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹61.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹456.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹456.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBFC.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹93.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SBFC.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹93.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹164.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹164.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MASFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MASFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹305.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PAISALO.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PAISALO.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹49.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹286.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹73.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹73.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SGFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SGFIN.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SGFIN.BO trades at ₹578.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to SGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SGFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SGFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹579.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs DHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹178.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹210.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹212.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SATIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹216.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SATIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹216.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FUSION.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹176.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is 176.37. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FUSION.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹176.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is 174.51. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹123.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 99.80. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MUFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹123.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFS.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PFS.NS trades at ₹30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFS.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PFS.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PFS.BO trades at ₹30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PFS.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹260.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹261.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,717.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 63.41. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,718.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 63.67. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹191.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -24.34. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹191.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs ASHIKA.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, ASHIKA.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while ASHIKA.BO trades at ₹367.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas ASHIKA.BO's P/E ratio is -28.26. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASHIKA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check ASHIKA.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹99.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS and UGROCAP.BO have similar daily volatility (2.63).Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹99.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs VHL.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,469.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs VHL.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,467.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CIFL.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CIFL.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹65.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹164.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -103.26. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹167.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -101.30. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs SARTELE.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, SARTELE.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while SARTELE.NS trades at ₹140.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas SARTELE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SARTELE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to SARTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check SARTELE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹114.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹192.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs MANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹107.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹239.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹239.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -368.58. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs PURPLEFIN.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -61.27. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here
IFCI.NS vs AFIL.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IITL.NS Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IITL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IITL.NS trades at ₹162.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IITL.NS's P/E ratio is 70.63. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IITL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IITL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IITL.NS's competition here
IFCI.NS vs IITL.BO Comparison May 2026
IFCI.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFCI.NS stands at 163.7B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFCI.NS is priced at ₹61.75, while IITL.BO trades at ₹166.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 88.03, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -67.94. In terms of profitability, IFCI.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFCI.NS is less volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFCI.NS.Check IITL.BO's competition here