Smart for Life, Inc.
Smart for Life, Inc. SMFL Peers
See (SMFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMFL | $0.01 | +4.84% | 740 | N/A | -$362.17 | N/A |
| KHC | $26.73 | +0.41% | 31.6B | 12.21 | $2.19 | +6.00% |
| GIS | $54.76 | +0.38% | 30B | 12.04 | $4.55 | +4.39% |
| MKC | $74.22 | +1.80% | 19.9B | 25.68 | $2.89 | +2.35% |
| MKC-V | $73.88 | +1.48% | 19.7B | 25.47 | $2.90 | +2.35% |
| HRL | $30.64 | -0.23% | 16.8B | 22.53 | $1.36 | +3.74% |
| SJM | $110.89 | -0.14% | 11.8B | -46.20 | -$2.40 | +3.90% |
| PPC | $46.97 | -1.08% | 11.1B | 9.25 | $5.08 | +13.39% |
| CAG | $22.36 | +0.45% | 10.7B | 33.37 | $0.67 | +6.28% |
| CPB | $34.48 | +1.06% | 10.3B | 22.99 | $1.50 | +4.42% |
Stock Comparison
SMFL vs KHC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while KHC trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs GIS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while GIS trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs MKC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while MKC trades at $74.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs MKC-V Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while MKC-V trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs HRL Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while HRL trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SJM Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SJM trades at $110.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -46.20. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs PPC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while PPC trades at $46.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs CAG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while CAG trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs CPB Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while CPB trades at $34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs INGR Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while INGR trades at $138.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs LW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while LW trades at $55.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRBR Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRBR trades at $60.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs POST Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while POST trades at $109.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRFS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRFS trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs DAR Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while DAR trades at $30.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs LANC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while LANC trades at $167.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs TWNK Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs TWNKW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FRPT Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FRPT trades at $80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 268.10. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FLO Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FLO trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SMPL Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SMPL trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs NOMD Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while NOMD trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SOVO Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs JJSF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while JJSF trades at $116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs CENT Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while CENT trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs CENTA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while CENTA trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs KLG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while KLG trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs UTZ Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while UTZ trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs THS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while THS trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 223.40. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs HLF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while HLF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs JBSS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while JBSS trades at $62.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs STKL Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 670M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while STKL trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SENEB Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SENEB trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SENEA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 647M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SENEA trades at $94.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs WEST Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 638.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while WEST trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs THRN Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs USNA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while USNA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs LWAY Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while LWAY trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BGS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BGS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs MAMA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while MAMA trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 79.40. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs NATR Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while NATR trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BYND Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BYND trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FREE Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs WESTW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs HAIN Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while HAIN trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs LFVN Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while LFVN trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs MMMB Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FTLF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FTLF trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRCC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRCC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs PLIN Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRLS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRLS trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs WYHG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while WYHG trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs ATPC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 76.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while ATPC trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs LSF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while LSF trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -76.11. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRID Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRID trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs PAVS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while PAVS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs MITC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs ABVE Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while ABVE trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FARM Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FARM trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs DDC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while DDC trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs CLXT Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs HAPP Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs YGF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL and YGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMFL vs JVA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while JVA trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs COOT Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while COOT trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs NAII Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while NAII trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BOF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BOF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs PLAG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while PLAG trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs STKH Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while STKH trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs ORIS Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while ORIS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs NCRA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while NCRA trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs TTCF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BON Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BON trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs PETZ Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while PETZ trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SOWG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SOWG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs HCWC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while HCWC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs NUZE Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BTTR Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs IMG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while IMG trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs CYAN Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while CYAN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FREEW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRLSW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRLSW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs FAMI Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while FAMI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs ABVEW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs RGF Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BTOG Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BTOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SNAX Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SNAX trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL and SNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMFL vs BSFC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BSFC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SNAXW Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs RIBT Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL and RIBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMFL vs VGFC Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs DTEA Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs SAFM Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.
SMFL vs BRCN Comparison
SMFL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFL stands at 740. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMFL is priced at $0.01, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SMFL's ROE is +5.18%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMFL is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFL.