Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFD | $26.83 | +4.40% | 10.4B | 10.28 | $2.57 | +4.30% |
| ADM | $82.31 | -2.14% | 40.2B | 37.22 | $2.24 | +2.47% |
| BG | $127.20 | -3.20% | 25.1B | 34.06 | $3.80 | +2.17% |
| TSN | $58.45 | +2.37% | 20.3B | 44.80 | $1.27 | +3.55% |
| AGRO | $11.69 | -4.14% | 6.8B | 605.00 | $0.02 | +2.44% |
| CALM | $75.86 | +0.67% | 3.5B | 5.18 | $14.37 | +6.44% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | +1.84% |
| FDP | $29.76 | +0.85% | 1.4B | 20.26 | $1.45 | +4.07% |
| DOLE | $13.90 | +0.94% | 1.3B | 14.99 | $0.93 | +2.45% |
| VITL | $10.08 | +2.15% | 421.2M | 9.45 | $1.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SFD vs ADM Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while ADM trades at $82.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ADM's competition here
SFD vs BG Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while BG trades at $127.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BG's competition here
SFD vs TSN Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while TSN trades at $58.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 44.80. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TSN's competition here
SFD vs AGRO Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AGRO trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 605.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGRO's competition here
SFD vs CALM Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while CALM trades at $75.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CALM's competition here
SFD vs IBA Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check IBA's competition here
SFD vs FDP Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while FDP trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FDP's competition here
SFD vs DOLE Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while DOLE trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DOLE's competition here
SFD vs VITL Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 421.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while VITL trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check VITL's competition here
SFD vs LND Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 374.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while LND trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas LND's P/E ratio is -125.33. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LND's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LND's competition here
SFD vs CHSCP Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while CHSCP trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCP's competition here
SFD vs CHSCO Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while CHSCO trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCO's competition here
SFD vs CHSCL Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 316.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while CHSCL trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCL's competition here
SFD vs CHSCN Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while CHSCN trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCN's competition here
SFD vs CHSCM Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 306.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while CHSCM trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCM's competition here
SFD vs ALCO Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 299.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while ALCO trades at $40.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ALCO's competition here
SFD vs VFF Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 282.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while VFF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check VFF's competition here
SFD vs AFRI Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AFRI trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRI's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AFRI's competition here
SFD vs LMNR Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while LMNR trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LMNR's competition here
SFD vs AGFS Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGFS's competition here
SFD vs LOCL Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while LOCL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LOCL's competition here
SFD vs PME Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PME's competition here
SFD vs AFRIW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AFRIW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -35.41. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AFRIW's competition here
SFD vs SDOT Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while SDOT trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SDOT's competition here
SFD vs APPH Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check APPH's competition here
SFD vs APPHW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check APPHW's competition here
SFD vs AQB Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AQB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AQB's ROE of -3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AQB's competition here
SFD vs EDBLW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while EDBLW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check EDBLW's competition here
SFD vs KALWW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check KALWW's competition here
SFD vs KAL Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check KAL's competition here
SFD vs AGRI Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AGRI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRI's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGRI's competition here
SFD vs AVX Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AVX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AVX's competition here
SFD vs AGRIW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 66.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGRIW's competition here
SFD vs EDBL Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 61.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while EDBL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check EDBL's competition here
SFD vs AAGRW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AAGRW's competition here
SFD vs SANW Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 43.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while SANW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SANW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SANW's competition here
SFD vs AAGR Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while AAGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AAGR's competition here
SFD vs DTCK Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while DTCK trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTCK's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DTCK's competition here
SFD vs OME Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while OME trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas OME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OME's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to OME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check OME's competition here
SFD vs LOCL-WT Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LOCL-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while LOCL-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas LOCL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOCL-WT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LOCL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LOCL-WT's competition here
SFD vs TSNU Comparison June 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TSNU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $26.83, while TSNU trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas TSNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSNU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to TSNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TSNU's competition here