Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFD | $24.76 | +0.28% | 9.7B | 9.80 | $2.53 | +4.56% |
| KHC | $25.45 | +1.48% | 30.2B | 9.98 | $2.55 | +6.40% |
| GIS | $37.22 | +2.08% | 19.9B | 10.49 | $3.55 | +6.67% |
| HRL | $25.15 | +1.37% | 13.8B | 17.84 | $1.41 | +4.74% |
| MKC-V | $51.33 | -2.80% | 13.8B | 16.26 | $3.16 | +3.52% |
| MKC | $50.92 | -3.65% | 13.7B | 16.05 | $3.17 | +3.55% |
| SJM | $109.02 | +0.19% | 11.7B | 11.91 | $9.15 | +4.03% |
| MICC | $18.68 | +0.92% | 11.4B | 15.33 | $1.22 | N/A |
| DAR | $60.62 | -1.96% | 9.6B | 36.08 | $1.68 | N/A |
| PPC | $28.42 | +0.71% | 6.8B | 6.44 | $4.41 | +7.47% |
Stock Comparison
SFD vs KHC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while KHC trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check KHC's competition here
SFD vs GIS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while GIS trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check GIS's competition here
SFD vs HRL Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while HRL trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check HRL's competition here
SFD vs MKC-V Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MKC-V trades at $51.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MKC-V's competition here
SFD vs MKC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MKC trades at $50.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MKC's competition here
SFD vs SJM Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SJM trades at $109.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SJM's competition here
SFD vs MICC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MICC trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MICC's competition here
SFD vs DAR Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while DAR trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DAR's competition here
SFD vs PPC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while PPC trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PPC's competition here
SFD vs CAG Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while CAG trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CAG's competition here
SFD vs CPB Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while CPB trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CPB's competition here
SFD vs LW Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while LW trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LW's competition here
SFD vs INGR Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while INGR trades at $99.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check INGR's competition here
SFD vs BRFS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRFS's competition here
SFD vs LANC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LANC's competition here
SFD vs TWNK Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TWNK's competition here
SFD vs TWNKW Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TWNKW's competition here
SFD vs POST Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while POST trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check POST's competition here
SFD vs MZTI Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MZTI trades at $105.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MZTI's competition here
SFD vs FRPT Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FRPT trades at $56.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FRPT's competition here
SFD vs CENTA Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while CENTA trades at $37.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CENTA's competition here
SFD vs CENT Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while CENT trades at $43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CENT's competition here
SFD vs SOVO Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SOVO's competition here
SFD vs KLG Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check KLG's competition here
SFD vs FLO Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FLO trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FLO's competition here
SFD vs NOMD Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while NOMD trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check NOMD's competition here
SFD vs JJSF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while JJSF trades at $75.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check JJSF's competition here
SFD vs BRBR Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRBR trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRBR's competition here
SFD vs HLF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while HLF trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check HLF's competition here
SFD vs THS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check THS's competition here
SFD vs SENEA Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SENEA trades at $167.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SENEA's competition here
SFD vs SENEB Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SENEB trades at $171.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SENEB's competition here
SFD vs SMPL Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SMPL trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SMPL's competition here
SFD vs JBSS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 973.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while JBSS trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check JBSS's competition here
SFD vs STKL Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check STKL's competition here
SFD vs MAMA Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 737.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MAMA trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 112.63. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MAMA's competition here
SFD vs WEST Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while WEST trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check WEST's competition here
SFD vs UTZ Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while UTZ trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check UTZ's competition here
SFD vs THRN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check THRN's competition here
SFD vs LWAY Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 480M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while LWAY trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LWAY's competition here
SFD vs NATR Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while NATR trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check NATR's competition here
SFD vs BRCC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRCC trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRCC's competition here
SFD vs BYND Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 326.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BYND trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BYND's competition here
SFD vs CHSCL Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 312.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while CHSCL trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCL's competition here
SFD vs BGS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BGS trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BGS's competition here
SFD vs FREE Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FREE's competition here
SFD vs WESTW Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check WESTW's competition here
SFD vs MMMB Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MMMB's competition here
SFD vs OFRM Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 122.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while OFRM trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -37.32. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check OFRM's competition here
SFD vs PLIN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PLIN's competition here
SFD vs FTLF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FTLF trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FTLF's competition here
SFD vs LFVN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while LFVN trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LFVN's competition here
SFD vs BOF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BOF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BOF's competition here
SFD vs BRID Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRID trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRID's competition here
SFD vs WYHG Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while WYHG trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 123.42. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check WYHG's competition here
SFD vs MITC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MITC's competition here
SFD vs HAIN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while HAIN trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check HAIN's competition here
SFD vs LSF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while LSF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LSF's competition here
SFD vs CLXT Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CLXT's competition here
SFD vs HAPP Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check HAPP's competition here
SFD vs FARM Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FARM's competition here
SFD vs YGF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check YGF's competition here
SFD vs JVA Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while JVA trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check JVA's competition here
SFD vs BRLS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRLS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRLS's competition here
SFD vs MWYN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MWYN trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MWYN's competition here
SFD vs DDC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while DDC trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DDC's competition here
SFD vs PLAG Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while PLAG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PLAG's competition here
SFD vs BRLSW Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRLSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRLSW's competition here
SFD vs NAII Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while NAII trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check NAII's competition here
SFD vs TTCF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TTCF's competition here
SFD vs COOT Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while COOT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COOT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check COOT's competition here
SFD vs PETZ Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while PETZ trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PETZ's competition here
SFD vs BON Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BON trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BON's competition here
SFD vs NUZE Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check NUZE's competition here
SFD vs ABVE Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while ABVE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ABVE's competition here
SFD vs BTTR Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BTTR's competition here
SFD vs SOWG Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SOWG trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SOWG's competition here
SFD vs HCWC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while HCWC trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check HCWC's competition here
SFD vs FREEW Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FREEW's competition here
SFD vs ATPC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while ATPC trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ATPC's competition here
SFD vs ORIS Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while ORIS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ORIS's competition here
SFD vs RGF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check RGF's competition here
SFD vs IMG Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check IMG's competition here
SFD vs NCRA Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 780.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while NCRA trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check NCRA's competition here
SFD vs FAMI Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 247K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while FAMI trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FAMI's competition here
SFD vs STKH Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 44.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while STKH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STKH's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check STKH's competition here
SFD vs SNAXW Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SNAXW's competition here
SFD vs VGFC Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check VGFC's competition here
SFD vs PF Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while PF trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas PF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PF's competition here
SFD vs DTEA Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DTEA's competition here
SFD vs MJN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while MJN trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check MJN's competition here
SFD vs BRCN Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BRCN's competition here
SFD vs SAFM Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SAFM's competition here
SFD vs LNCE Comparison July 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $24.76, while LNCE trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LNCE's competition here