Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFD | $29.35 | +0.24% | 11.5B | 11.69 | $2.51 | +3.64% |
| ADM | $69.23 | -1.14% | 33.4B | 31.04 | $2.23 | +2.98% |
| BG | $124.90 | -1.20% | 24.2B | 25.34 | $4.93 | +2.26% |
| TSN | $64.03 | -1.84% | 22.8B | 114.31 | $0.56 | +3.17% |
| AGRO | $12.78 | -3.69% | 6.5B | -255.60 | -$0.05 | +2.77% |
| CALM | $76.24 | +0.08% | 3.6B | 5.31 | $14.37 | +10.44% |
| IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | +1.84% |
| FDP | $41.85 | -1.06% | 2B | 22.25 | $1.88 | +2.90% |
| DOLE | $15.12 | -0.13% | 1.4B | 14.96 | $1.01 | +2.27% |
| VITL | $12.64 | -0.71% | 566.2M | 8.78 | $1.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SFD vs ADM Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while ADM trades at $69.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ADM's competition here
SFD vs BG Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while BG trades at $124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check BG's competition here
SFD vs TSN Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while TSN trades at $64.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 114.31. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TSN's competition here
SFD vs AGRO Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AGRO trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is -255.60. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGRO's competition here
SFD vs CALM Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while CALM trades at $76.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CALM's competition here
SFD vs IBA Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check IBA's competition here
SFD vs FDP Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while FDP trades at $41.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check FDP's competition here
SFD vs DOLE Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while DOLE trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DOLE's competition here
SFD vs VITL Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 566.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while VITL trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check VITL's competition here
SFD vs LND Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 403.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while LND trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LND's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LND's competition here
SFD vs CHSCP Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while CHSCP trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCP's competition here
SFD vs VFF Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while VFF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check VFF's competition here
SFD vs ALCO Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 324.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while ALCO trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check ALCO's competition here
SFD vs CHSCO Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while CHSCO trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCO's competition here
SFD vs CHSCL Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while CHSCL trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCL's competition here
SFD vs CHSCN Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while CHSCN trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCN's competition here
SFD vs CHSCM Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while CHSCM trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check CHSCM's competition here
SFD vs AFRI Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AFRI trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AFRI's competition here
SFD vs LMNR Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while LMNR trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LMNR's competition here
SFD vs AGFS Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGFS's competition here
SFD vs LOCL Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while LOCL trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LOCL's competition here
SFD vs AFRIW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AFRIW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -41.74. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AFRIW's competition here
SFD vs PME Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check PME's competition here
SFD vs APPH Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check APPH's competition here
SFD vs APPHW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check APPHW's competition here
SFD vs AQB Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AQB trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AQB's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AQB's competition here
SFD vs EDBLW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while EDBLW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check EDBLW's competition here
SFD vs KALWW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check KALWW's competition here
SFD vs KAL Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check KAL's competition here
SFD vs AGRI Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AGRI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGRI's competition here
SFD vs SDOT Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while SDOT trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDOT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SDOT's competition here
SFD vs AVX Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AVX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AVX's competition here
SFD vs AAGR Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 572.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AAGR's competition here
SFD vs EDBL Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 142.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while EDBL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check EDBL's competition here
SFD vs AGRIW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 66.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AGRIW's competition here
SFD vs AAGRW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check AAGRW's competition here
SFD vs SANW Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 43.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while SANW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SANW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check SANW's competition here
SFD vs DTCK Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while DTCK trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTCK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check DTCK's competition here
SFD vs TSNU Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, TSNU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while TSNU trades at $66.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas TSNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSNU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TSNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check TSNU's competition here
SFD vs LOCL-WT Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, LOCL-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while LOCL-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas LOCL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOCL-WT's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LOCL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check LOCL-WT's competition here
SFD vs OME Comparison April 2026
SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 11.5B. In comparison, OME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $29.35, while OME trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.69, whereas OME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OME's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to OME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.Check OME's competition here