Seneca Foods Corporation
Seneca Foods Corporation SENEB Peers
See (SENEB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEB | $99.99 | +6.37% | 677.2M | 16.95 | $5.90 | N/A |
| KHC | $25.79 | +0.23% | 30.5B | 11.78 | $2.19 | +6.21% |
| GIS | $50.37 | -0.61% | 27.6B | 12.28 | $4.10 | +4.76% |
| MKC | $77.57 | +5.34% | 20.8B | 26.74 | $2.90 | +2.24% |
| MKC-V | $77.65 | +5.78% | 20.8B | 26.63 | $2.90 | +2.24% |
| HRL | $30.25 | +1.37% | 16.6B | 22.24 | $1.36 | +3.79% |
| PPC | $44.55 | -0.80% | 10.6B | 8.77 | $5.08 | +14.12% |
| SJM | $96.14 | +0.44% | 10.2B | -8.31 | -$11.57 | +4.51% |
| CAG | $20.50 | +0.24% | 9.8B | 30.12 | $0.68 | +6.84% |
| CPB | $30.96 | -0.71% | 9.2B | 20.65 | $1.50 | +4.90% |
Stock Comparison
SENEB vs KHC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while KHC trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs GIS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while GIS trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs MKC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while MKC trades at $77.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs MKC-V Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while MKC-V trades at $77.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs HRL Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while HRL trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs PPC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while PPC trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SJM Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SJM trades at $96.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs CAG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while CAG trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs CPB Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while CPB trades at $30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs INGR Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while INGR trades at $135.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs LW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while LW trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRBR Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRBR trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs DAR Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while DAR trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs POST Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while POST trades at $108.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRFS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRFS trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs LANC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while LANC trades at $171.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs TWNK Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs TWNKW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FLO Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FLO trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FRPT Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FRPT trades at $68.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 227.53. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SMPL Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SMPL trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs NOMD Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while NOMD trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SOVO Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs JJSF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while JJSF trades at $115.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs CENTA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while CENTA trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs CENT Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while CENT trades at $35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs KLG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while KLG trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs UTZ Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while UTZ trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs THS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 997.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while THS trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 197.60. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs HLF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while HLF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs JBSS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while JBSS trades at $62.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs STKL Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while STKL trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SENEA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 689.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SENEA trades at $99.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs USNA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 574.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while USNA trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs WEST Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while WEST trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs THRN Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs LWAY Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while LWAY trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BGS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BGS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs MAMA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while MAMA trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 73.73. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs NATR Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while NATR trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRCC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRCC trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BYND Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BYND trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FREE Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs WESTW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs LFVN Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while LFVN trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs MMMB Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs HAIN Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while HAIN trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FTLF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FTLF trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs PLIN Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRLS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRLS trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs ABVEW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRID Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRID trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs LSF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while LSF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -68.67. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs ATPC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while ATPC trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs ABVE Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while ABVE trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs MITC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs WYHG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while WYHG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs PAVS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while PAVS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs DDC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while DDC trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs CLXT Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs HAPP Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FARM Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FARM trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs JVA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while JVA trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs YGF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs COOT Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while COOT trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BOF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BOF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs NAII Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while NAII trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs NCRA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while NCRA trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs STKH Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while STKH trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs TTCF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs ORIS Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while ORIS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs IMG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while IMG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs PETZ Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while PETZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BON Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BON trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SOWG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SOWG trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs HCWC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while HCWC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs NUZE Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs PLAG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while PLAG trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BTTR Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FREEW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs CYAN Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while CYAN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs FAMI Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while FAMI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs RGF Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRLSW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRLSW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BTOG Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BTOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SNAX Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 827.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SNAX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BSFC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 778.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SMFL Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 283.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SMFL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SNAXW Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs RIBT Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs BRCN Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs DTEA Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs VGFC Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.
SENEB vs SAFM Comparison
SENEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEB stands at 677.2M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEB is priced at $99.99, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SENEB's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEB is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEB.