Seneca Foods Corporation
Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SENEA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEA | $102.12 | +0.36% | 705.4M | 17.31 | $5.90 | N/A |
| KHC | $28.25 | -1.50% | 33.4B | 12.90 | $2.19 | +5.67% |
| GIS | $49.85 | -2.39% | 27B | 12.16 | $4.10 | +4.83% |
| MKC | $71.61 | +0.06% | 19.2B | 24.95 | $2.87 | +2.47% |
| MKC-V | $72.54 | +1.31% | 19.2B | 24.90 | $2.87 | +2.47% |
| HRL | $28.55 | -2.36% | 15.7B | 21.00 | $1.36 | +4.03% |
| SJM | $108.70 | -0.29% | 11.6B | -9.40 | -$11.57 | +3.98% |
| PPC | $47.65 | -0.42% | 11.3B | 9.38 | $5.08 | +13.30% |
| CPB | $32.24 | -1.29% | 9.6B | 21.49 | $1.50 | +4.77% |
| CAG | $19.20 | -0.05% | 9.2B | 8.00 | $2.40 | +7.28% |
Stock Comparison
SENEA vs KHC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while KHC trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check KHC's competition here
SENEA vs GIS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while GIS trades at $49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check GIS's competition here
SENEA vs MKC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while MKC trades at $71.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA and MKC have similar daily volatility (2.53).Check MKC's competition here
SENEA vs MKC-V Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while MKC-V trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MKC-V's competition here
SENEA vs HRL Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while HRL trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HRL's competition here
SENEA vs SJM Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SJM trades at $108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SJM's competition here
SENEA vs PPC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while PPC trades at $47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PPC's competition here
SENEA vs CPB Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while CPB trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CPB's competition here
SENEA vs CAG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while CAG trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CAG's competition here
SENEA vs INGR Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while INGR trades at $131.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check INGR's competition here
SENEA vs LW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while LW trades at $59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LW's competition here
SENEA vs BRBR Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRBR trades at $55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRBR's competition here
SENEA vs BRFS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRFS trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRFS's competition here
SENEA vs POST Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while POST trades at $106.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check POST's competition here
SENEA vs DAR Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while DAR trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 52.88. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check DAR's competition here
SENEA vs LANC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LANC's competition here
SENEA vs TWNK Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check TWNK's competition here
SENEA vs TWNKW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check TWNKW's competition here
SENEA vs FLO Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FLO trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FLO's competition here
SENEA vs FRPT Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FRPT trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FRPT's competition here
SENEA vs SMPL Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SMPL trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SMPL's competition here
SENEA vs NOMD Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while NOMD trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NOMD's competition here
SENEA vs SOVO Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SOVO's competition here
SENEA vs CENTA Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while CENTA trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CENTA's competition here
SENEA vs CENT Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while CENT trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CENT's competition here
SENEA vs JJSF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while JJSF trades at $115.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check JJSF's competition here
SENEA vs KLG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while KLG trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 35.57. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check KLG's competition here
SENEA vs UTZ Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while UTZ trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check UTZ's competition here
SENEA vs THS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while THS trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 208.95. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check THS's competition here
SENEA vs HLF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 993M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while HLF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HLF's competition here
SENEA vs JBSS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 783.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while JBSS trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check JBSS's competition here
SENEA vs STKL Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 752.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while STKL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -71.11. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check STKL's competition here
SENEA vs SENEB Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 711.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SENEB trades at $103.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SENEB's competition here
SENEA vs WEST Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 677.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while WEST trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check WEST's competition here
SENEA vs USNA Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 585.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while USNA trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check USNA's competition here
SENEA vs THRN Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check THRN's competition here
SENEA vs BRCC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRCC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRCC's competition here
SENEA vs LWAY Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while LWAY trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LWAY's competition here
SENEA vs BGS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 342.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BGS trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BGS's competition here
SENEA vs MAMA Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while MAMA trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 80.36. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MAMA's competition here
SENEA vs NATR Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 272M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while NATR trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NATR's competition here
SENEA vs BYND Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BYND trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BYND's competition here
SENEA vs FREE Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FREE's competition here
SENEA vs WESTW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check WESTW's competition here
SENEA vs LFVN Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while LFVN trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LFVN's competition here
SENEA vs HAIN Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while HAIN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HAIN's competition here
SENEA vs MMMB Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MMMB's competition here
SENEA vs DDC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while DDC trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check DDC's competition here
SENEA vs FTLF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FTLF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FTLF's competition here
SENEA vs PLIN Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PLIN's competition here
SENEA vs ABVEW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while ABVEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ABVEW's competition here
SENEA vs ABVE Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while ABVE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ABVE's competition here
SENEA vs LSF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while LSF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -79.61. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LSF's competition here
SENEA vs BRID Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRID trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRID's competition here
SENEA vs ATPC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while ATPC trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ATPC's competition here
SENEA vs BRLS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRLS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRLS's competition here
SENEA vs WYHG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while WYHG trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check WYHG's competition here
SENEA vs MITC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MITC's competition here
SENEA vs PAVS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while PAVS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PAVS's competition here
SENEA vs FARM Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FARM trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FARM's competition here
SENEA vs CLXT Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CLXT's competition here
SENEA vs HAPP Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HAPP's competition here
SENEA vs BTOG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BTOG trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BTOG's competition here
SENEA vs JVA Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while JVA trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check JVA's competition here
SENEA vs BOF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BOF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BOF's competition here
SENEA vs YGF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check YGF's competition here
SENEA vs NCRA Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while NCRA trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NCRA's competition here
SENEA vs NAII Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while NAII trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NAII's competition here
SENEA vs PLAG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while PLAG trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PLAG's competition here
SENEA vs COOT Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while COOT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check COOT's competition here
SENEA vs SOWG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SOWG trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SOWG's competition here
SENEA vs TTCF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check TTCF's competition here
SENEA vs PETZ Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while PETZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PETZ's competition here
SENEA vs BON Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BON trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BON's competition here
SENEA vs IMG Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while IMG trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check IMG's competition here
SENEA vs NUZE Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NUZE's competition here
SENEA vs HCWC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while HCWC trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HCWC's competition here
SENEA vs BTTR Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BTTR's competition here
SENEA vs ORIS Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while ORIS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ORIS's competition here
SENEA vs FREEW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FREEW's competition here
SENEA vs CYAN Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while CYAN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CYAN's competition here
SENEA vs FAMI Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while FAMI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FAMI's competition here
SENEA vs BRLSW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRLSW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRLSW's competition here
SENEA vs RGF Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check RGF's competition here
SENEA vs STKH Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while STKH trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check STKH's competition here
SENEA vs BSFC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 772.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BSFC's competition here
SENEA vs SNAX Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 660K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SNAX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SNAX's competition here
SENEA vs SMFL Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 171.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SMFL's competition here
SENEA vs SNAXW Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SNAXW's competition here
SENEA vs RIBT Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check RIBT's competition here
SENEA vs BRCN Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRCN's competition here
SENEA vs VGFC Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check VGFC's competition here
SENEA vs DTEA Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check DTEA's competition here
SENEA vs SAFM Comparison July 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 705.4M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $102.12, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.31, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SAFM's competition here