Seneca Foods Corporation
Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SENEA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEA | $108.71 | -0.06% | 749.2M | 17.42 | $6.24 | N/A |
| KHC | $27.69 | -1.32% | 32.8B | -6.21 | -$4.46 | +5.76% |
| GIS | $49.33 | -1.69% | 26.8B | 12.03 | $4.10 | +4.88% |
| MKC-V | $70.57 | -2.34% | 18.9B | 24.59 | $2.87 | +2.51% |
| MKC | $70.56 | -2.35% | 18.9B | 24.59 | $2.87 | +2.50% |
| HRL | $28.87 | -1.30% | 15.9B | 21.22 | $1.36 | +3.99% |
| SJM | $111.55 | -1.46% | 11.9B | -9.64 | -$11.57 | +3.88% |
| PPC | $45.06 | -2.38% | 10.7B | 8.68 | $5.19 | +18.53% |
| CPB | $32.52 | -1.87% | 9.7B | 21.68 | $1.50 | +4.72% |
| CAG | $19.16 | -2.54% | 9.1B | 7.98 | $2.40 | +7.30% |
Stock Comparison
SENEA vs KHC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while KHC trades at $27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check KHC's competition here
SENEA vs GIS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while GIS trades at $49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check GIS's competition here
SENEA vs MKC-V Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while MKC-V trades at $70.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MKC-V's competition here
SENEA vs MKC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while MKC trades at $70.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MKC's competition here
SENEA vs HRL Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while HRL trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HRL's competition here
SENEA vs SJM Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SJM trades at $111.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SJM's competition here
SENEA vs PPC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while PPC trades at $45.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PPC's competition here
SENEA vs CPB Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while CPB trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CPB's competition here
SENEA vs CAG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while CAG trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CAG's competition here
SENEA vs INGR Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while INGR trades at $128.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check INGR's competition here
SENEA vs LW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while LW trades at $55.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LW's competition here
SENEA vs POST Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while POST trades at $112.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check POST's competition here
SENEA vs BRFS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRFS trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRFS's competition here
SENEA vs DAR Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while DAR trades at $35.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 55.31. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check DAR's competition here
SENEA vs BRBR Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRBR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRBR's competition here
SENEA vs LANC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LANC's competition here
SENEA vs TWNK Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check TWNK's competition here
SENEA vs TWNKW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check TWNKW's competition here
SENEA vs FLO Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FLO trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FLO's competition here
SENEA vs SMPL Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SMPL trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SMPL's competition here
SENEA vs FRPT Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FRPT trades at $56.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 85.29. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FRPT's competition here
SENEA vs NOMD Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while NOMD trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NOMD's competition here
SENEA vs SOVO Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SOVO's competition here
SENEA vs JJSF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while JJSF trades at $115.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check JJSF's competition here
SENEA vs CENT Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while CENT trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CENT's competition here
SENEA vs CENTA Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while CENTA trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CENTA's competition here
SENEA vs KLG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while KLG trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.57. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check KLG's competition here
SENEA vs UTZ Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while UTZ trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 63.52. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check UTZ's competition here
SENEA vs HLF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 974.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while HLF trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HLF's competition here
SENEA vs THS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 951.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while THS trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check THS's competition here
SENEA vs JBSS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 772.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while JBSS trades at $66.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check JBSS's competition here
SENEA vs STKL Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 752.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while STKL trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -318.50. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check STKL's competition here
SENEA vs SENEB Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 749.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SENEB trades at $108.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SENEB's competition here
SENEA vs WEST Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 598.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while WEST trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check WEST's competition here
SENEA vs USNA Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 581.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while USNA trades at $31.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check USNA's competition here
SENEA vs THRN Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check THRN's competition here
SENEA vs LWAY Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 462.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while LWAY trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 43.37. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LWAY's competition here
SENEA vs BGS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BGS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BGS's competition here
SENEA vs BRCC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 335.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRCC trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRCC's competition here
SENEA vs MAMA Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while MAMA trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 76.73. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MAMA's competition here
SENEA vs NATR Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 292.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while NATR trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NATR's competition here
SENEA vs FREE Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FREE's competition here
SENEA vs BYND Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BYND trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BYND's competition here
SENEA vs FTLF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FTLF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FTLF's competition here
SENEA vs WESTW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check WESTW's competition here
SENEA vs HAIN Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while HAIN trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HAIN's competition here
SENEA vs LFVN Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while LFVN trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LFVN's competition here
SENEA vs MMMB Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MMMB's competition here
SENEA vs SNAX Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SNAX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SNAX's competition here
SENEA vs PLIN Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PLIN's competition here
SENEA vs DDC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while DDC trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check DDC's competition here
SENEA vs ABVE Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 106.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while ABVE trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ABVE's competition here
SENEA vs ABVEW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while ABVEW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ABVEW's competition here
SENEA vs WYHG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while WYHG trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check WYHG's competition here
SENEA vs BRID Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRID trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRID's competition here
SENEA vs ATPC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while ATPC trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ATPC's competition here
SENEA vs BRLS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRLS trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRLS's competition here
SENEA vs LSF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while LSF trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -57.90. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check LSF's competition here
SENEA vs MITC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check MITC's competition here
SENEA vs PAVS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while PAVS trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PAVS's competition here
SENEA vs FARM Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FARM trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FARM's competition here
SENEA vs CLXT Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CLXT's competition here
SENEA vs HAPP Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HAPP's competition here
SENEA vs BTOG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BTOG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BTOG's competition here
SENEA vs NAII Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while NAII trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NAII's competition here
SENEA vs JVA Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while JVA trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check JVA's competition here
SENEA vs YGF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check YGF's competition here
SENEA vs BOF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BOF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BOF's competition here
SENEA vs NCRA Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while NCRA trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NCRA's competition here
SENEA vs COOT Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while COOT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check COOT's competition here
SENEA vs TTCF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check TTCF's competition here
SENEA vs PLAG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while PLAG trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -66.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PLAG's competition here
SENEA vs PETZ Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while PETZ trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check PETZ's competition here
SENEA vs BON Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BON trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BON's competition here
SENEA vs IMG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while IMG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMG's ROE of +35.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check IMG's competition here
SENEA vs SOWG Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SOWG trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SOWG's competition here
SENEA vs NUZE Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check NUZE's competition here
SENEA vs HCWC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while HCWC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check HCWC's competition here
SENEA vs BTTR Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BTTR's competition here
SENEA vs FREEW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FREEW's competition here
SENEA vs ORIS Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while ORIS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check ORIS's competition here
SENEA vs CYAN Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while CYAN trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check CYAN's competition here
SENEA vs FAMI Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while FAMI trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check FAMI's competition here
SENEA vs RGF Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check RGF's competition here
SENEA vs BRLSW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRLSW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRLSW's competition here
SENEA vs STKH Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 473.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while STKH trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check STKH's competition here
SENEA vs BSFC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 387.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BSFC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -18.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BSFC's competition here
SENEA vs SMFL Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 23.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SMFL's competition here
SENEA vs SNAXW Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SNAXW's competition here
SENEA vs RIBT Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check RIBT's competition here
SENEA vs SAFM Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check SAFM's competition here
SENEA vs DTEA Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check DTEA's competition here
SENEA vs VGFC Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check VGFC's competition here
SENEA vs BRCN Comparison August 2025
SENEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SENEA stands at 749.2M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SENEA is priced at $108.71, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SENEA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.42, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SENEA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SENEA is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENEA.Check BRCN's competition here