SAIHEAT Limited

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 223.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while IBM trades at $237.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check IBM's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while ACN trades at $246.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check ACN's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while FISV trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check FISV's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while FI trades at $134.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check FI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while INFY trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check INFY's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CTSH trades at $69.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CTSH's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while BR trades at $259.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check BR's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while WIT trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check WIT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while LDOS trades at $178.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check LDOS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CDW trades at $166.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CDW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while GIB trades at $93.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check GIB's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while IT trades at $243.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check IT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while AUROW trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check AUROW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while AUR trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check AUR's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while JKHY trades at $159.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check JKHY's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CACI trades at $490.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CACI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while EPAM trades at $159.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check EPAM's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while G trades at $43.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check G's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while DLB trades at $72.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check DLB's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while KD trades at $30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check KD's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while EXLS trades at $42.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check EXLS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while WAY trades at $35.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 65.60. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check WAY's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while GDS trades at $31.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 285.55. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check GDS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SAIC trades at $117.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check SAIC's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while PAY trades at $37.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 85.15. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check PAY's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while INGM trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check INGM's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check NCR's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while APLD trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check APLD's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while WNS trades at $74.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check WNS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CD trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CD's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CNXC trades at $48.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CNXC's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while GLOB trades at $78.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check GLOB's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CLVT trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CLVT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check PRFT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while DXC trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check DXC's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while AI trades at $17.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check AI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while BBAI-WT trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while BBAI trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check BBAI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while ASGN trades at $50.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check ASGN's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while VNET trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -777.00. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check VNET's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while FORTY trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW and FORTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FORTY's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while VYX trades at $12.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -24.04. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check VYX's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while NYAX trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 78.36. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check NYAX's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while TASK trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check TASK's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while FLYW trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 247.40. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check FLYW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW and TWKS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWKS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while NABL trades at $7.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 767.00. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check NABL's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while INOD trades at $40.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check INOD's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 999.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while MGIC trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check MGIC's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 863.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW and PSFE-WT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSFE-WT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 813.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while PSFE trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check PSFE's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 800.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CTLP trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CTLP's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 652M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while GDYN trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check GDYN's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while PHLT trades at $7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -761.00. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check PHLT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 557.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while HCKT trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check HCKT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while LZMH trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 334.00. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check LZMH's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 505.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while XRX trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check XRX's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 409.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while TSSI trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check TSSI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while TLS trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check TLS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 384.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while IBEX trades at $29.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check IBEX's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CNDT trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CNDT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SDHIU trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW and SDHIU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDHIU's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while UIS trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check UIS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check BULLZ's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while III trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas III's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check III's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while DMRC trades at $11.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check DMRC's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check SRT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while TTEC trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check TTEC's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CTG's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while LHSW trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check LHSW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CSPI trades at $12.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -77.78. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CSPI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check ALYA's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CTM trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CTM's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check NOTE-WT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while NOTE trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check NOTE's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SAIH trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check SAIH's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while GMM trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check GMM's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while BTCM trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check BTCM's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while DVLT trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check DVLT's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while USIO trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check USIO's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while WYY trades at $3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check WYY's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while DTST trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 224.50. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check DTST's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while VEEA trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check VEEA's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CLPS trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW and CLPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPS's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while VEEAW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check VEEAW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while JFU trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check JFU's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CYCUW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while GLE trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check GLE's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -9.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check SGLB's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while MASK trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check MASK's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while CYCU trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check CYCU's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while ARBB trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check ARBB's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while TDTH trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check TDTH's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while JDZG trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check JDZG's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SASI's ROE of -3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check SASI's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check WAVD's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while DTSTW trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check DTSTW's competition here

SAIHW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAIHW stands at 80.9M. In comparison, SWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAIHW is priced at $0.14, while SWCH trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAIHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, SAIHW's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAIHW is less volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAIHW.Check SWCH's competition here