RealNetworks, Inc.
RealNetworks, Inc. RNWK Peers
See (RNWK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNWK | $0.73 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | $296.04 | +0.91% | 345.4B | 52.86 | $5.60 | +0.89% |
| CRM | $263.80 | +2.09% | 252.2B | 41.35 | $6.38 | +0.61% |
| INTU | $768.08 | +1.87% | 214.3B | 62.91 | $12.21 | +0.53% |
| NOW | $1,005.11 | +1.66% | 208.2B | 138.25 | $7.27 | N/A |
| UBER | $85.14 | +1.44% | 178B | 14.91 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $108.37 | +2.88% | 140.5B | 88.11 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $370.68 | +1.70% | 125.4B | 66.91 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $382.25 | -0.16% | 104.5B | -17.19 | -$22.24 | N/A |
| CDNS | $300.81 | +0.27% | 82.1B | 76.35 | $3.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RNWK vs SAP Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 345.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SAP trades at $296.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.86. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CRM Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 252.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CRM trades at $263.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs INTU Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 214.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while INTU trades at $768.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.91. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs NOW Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 208.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while NOW trades at $1,005.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 138.25. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs UBER Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while UBER trades at $85.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs SHOP Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SHOP trades at $108.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 88.11. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs APP Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while APP trades at $370.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs MSTR Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while MSTR trades at $382.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.19. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CDNS Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CDNS trades at $300.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 76.35. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs SNOW Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SNOW trades at $209.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -49.68. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs WDAY Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while WDAY trades at $245.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 135.72. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ADSK Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ADSK trades at $299.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 64.09. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs TEAM Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while TEAM trades at $200.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -121.41. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs FICO Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while FICO trades at $1,813.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 78.16. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DDOG Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DDOG trades at $121.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 259.43. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs TTD Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while TTD trades at $70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 85.67. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ANSS Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ANSS trades at $338.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs HUBS Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while HUBS trades at $549.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1248.05. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs STRK Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while STRK trades at $104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs TYL Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while TYL trades at $589.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 89.16. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs STRF Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while STRF trades at $103.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ZM Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ZM trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DUOL Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DUOL trades at $474.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 236.27. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs GWRE Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while GWRE trades at $253.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 590.00. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PTC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PTC trades at $172.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.42. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs SSNC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SSNC trades at $80.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs GRAB Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while GRAB trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 471.00. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs AZPN Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DT trades at $54.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DOCU Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DOCU trades at $75.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs MNDY Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while MNDY trades at $289.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 315.03. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BSY Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BSY trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 64.13. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PAYC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PAYC trades at $246.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BKI Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs MANH Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while MANH trades at $192.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.04. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs QXO Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while QXO trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -57.40. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs XM Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CDAY Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs NICE Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while NICE trades at $167.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs U Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while U trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.77. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PCTY Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PCTY trades at $179.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.77. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PCOR Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PCOR trades at $65.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -76.35. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs TTAN Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while TTAN trades at $106.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DAY Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DAY trades at $58.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 364.63. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PEGA Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PEGA trades at $100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ESTC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ESTC trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -78.04. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DSGX Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DSGX trades at $97.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 59.36. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CVLT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CVLT trades at $187.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 112.26. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs APPF Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while APPF trades at $227.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs NATI Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs SMAR Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs SRAD Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SRAD trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 129.74. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs OTEX Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while OTEX trades at $28.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs GTLB Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while GTLB trades at $42.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 467.67. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CWAN Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CWAN trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs LYFT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while LYFT trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 99.80. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs COUP Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs VERX Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while VERX trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -127.62. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs IDCC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while IDCC trades at $222.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs QTWO Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while QTWO trades at $87.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -258.47. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ETWO-WT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BULL Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BULL trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs LIF Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while LIF trades at $62.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 482.54. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs FROG Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while FROG trades at $41.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -58.44. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs GRND Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while GRND trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs FRSH Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while FRSH trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -64.46. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs INTA Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while INTA trades at $54.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -227.12. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BILL Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BILL trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CVT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PYCR Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs RUM Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while RUM trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs SOUN Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while SOUN trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -15.93. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs RUMBW Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while RUMBW trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PWSC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs WK Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while WK trades at $67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ZI Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs RIOT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while RIOT trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs AYX Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ENV Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs INST Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BL Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BL trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs KC Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while KC trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DAVEW Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DAVEW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs COMP Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while COMP trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.27. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ASAN Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ASAN trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs NCNO Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while NCNO trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -107.60. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CALX Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CALX trades at $47.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -91.79. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs AGYS Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while AGYS trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 134.09. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BRZE Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BRZE trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BLKB Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BLKB trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ZETA Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ZETA trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -50.48. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs GBTG Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while GBTG trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -61.65. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs DAVE Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while DAVE trades at $216.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 60.87. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ALRM Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ALRM trades at $57.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ALKT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ALKT trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -73.49. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs ALIT Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while ALIT trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs PRGS Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while PRGS trades at $63.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs CLSK Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while CLSK trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.
RNWK vs BTDR Comparison
RNWK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNWK stands at 0. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNWK is priced at $0.73, while BTDR trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNWK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, RNWK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNWK is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNWK.