The Real Good Food Company, Inc.
The Real Good Food Company, Inc. RGF Peers
See (RGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 2.2M | -0.05 | -$24.72 | N/A |
| KHC | $27.06 | +1.69% | 32B | 12.35 | $2.19 | +5.91% |
| GIS | $53.83 | +1.21% | 29.5B | 13.13 | $4.10 | +4.45% |
| MKC | $76.56 | -0.79% | 20.5B | 26.68 | $2.87 | +2.27% |
| MKC-V | $75.71 | -2.07% | 20.2B | 26.38 | $2.87 | +2.27% |
| HRL | $30.81 | +0.36% | 16.9B | 22.65 | $1.36 | +3.72% |
| SJM | $104.83 | +1.83% | 11.2B | -9.06 | -$11.57 | +4.13% |
| PPC | $45.73 | +0.53% | 10.8B | 9.00 | $5.08 | +13.81% |
| CAG | $21.14 | +0.43% | 10.1B | 31.08 | $0.68 | +6.61% |
| CPB | $31.94 | +0.79% | 9.5B | 21.29 | $1.50 | +4.76% |
Stock Comparison
RGF vs KHC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while KHC trades at $27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs GIS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while GIS trades at $53.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs MKC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while MKC trades at $76.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs MKC-V Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while MKC-V trades at $75.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs HRL Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while HRL trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SJM Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SJM trades at $104.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs PPC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while PPC trades at $45.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs CAG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while CAG trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs CPB Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while CPB trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs INGR Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while INGR trades at $138.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs LW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while LW trades at $52.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRBR Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRBR trades at $57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs DAR Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while DAR trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs POST Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while POST trades at $111.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRFS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRFS trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs LANC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs TWNK Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs TWNKW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FRPT Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FRPT trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 240.63. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FLO Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FLO trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SMPL Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SMPL trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs NOMD Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while NOMD trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SOVO Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs JJSF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while JJSF trades at $119.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs CENTA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while CENTA trades at $32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs CENT Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while CENT trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs KLG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while KLG trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs UTZ Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while UTZ trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 40.08. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs THS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while THS trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 210.30. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs HLF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 990M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while HLF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs JBSS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 781.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while JBSS trades at $66.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SENEA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 732.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SENEA trades at $105.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs STKL Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 719.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while STKL trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SENEB Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 711.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SENEB trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs USNA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while USNA trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs WEST Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while WEST trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs THRN Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs LWAY Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 394.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while LWAY trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BGS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BGS trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRCC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 337M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRCC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs MAMA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 332.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while MAMA trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 80.27. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs NATR Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while NATR trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BYND Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 273.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BYND trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FREE Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs LFVN Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while LFVN trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs WESTW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs HAIN Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while HAIN trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs MMMB Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FTLF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FTLF trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs PLIN Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs ABVEW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRLS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRLS trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRID Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRID trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs WYHG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while WYHG trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs ATPC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while ATPC trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs LSF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while LSF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -71.44. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs PAVS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while PAVS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs MITC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs ABVE Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while ABVE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs DDC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while DDC trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs CLXT Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs HAPP Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FARM Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FARM trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BOF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs JVA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while JVA trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs YGF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs COOT Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while COOT trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs NAII Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while NAII trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs NCRA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while NCRA trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs ORIS Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while ORIS trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs STKH Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while STKH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs TTCF Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs PETZ Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while PETZ trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BON Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BON trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs IMG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while IMG trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SOWG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SOWG trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs HCWC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while HCWC trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs NUZE Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs PLAG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while PLAG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BTTR Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FREEW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs CYAN Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while CYAN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRLSW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRLSW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs FAMI Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while FAMI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BTOG Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BTOG trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SNAX Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SNAX trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BSFC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 939.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BSFC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SMFL Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 89.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SMFL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SNAXW Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs RIBT Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs DTEA Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs VGFC Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs SAFM Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.
RGF vs BRCN Comparison
RGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGF stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGF is priced at $1.25, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, RGF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGF is more volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGF.