QAD Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for QADA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for QADA
QAD Inc. (QADA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QADA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QADA | $87.65 | +0.02% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | $162.81 | -3.77% | 191.6B | 23.30 | $7.06 | +1.60% |
| CRM | $165.76 | -6.02% | 160.1B | 21.93 | $7.79 | +0.99% |
| UBER | $71.05 | -1.84% | 147.8B | 15.18 | $4.73 | N/A |
| SHOP | $111.01 | -7.57% | 146.7B | 120.84 | $0.93 | N/A |
| APP | $367.15 | -6.15% | 128.1B | 37.73 | $10.05 | N/A |
| INTU | $348.01 | -10.65% | 100.6B | 23.52 | $15.38 | +1.30% |
| NOW | $84.07 | -13.75% | 93.9B | 53.77 | $1.67 | N/A |
| CDNS | $274.44 | -5.20% | 76.6B | 69.39 | $4.05 | N/A |
| ADSK | $215.45 | -10.47% | 47.7B | 42.96 | $5.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QADA vs SAP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 191.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SAP trades at $162.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SAP's competition here
QADA vs CRM Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 160.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CRM trades at $165.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CRM's competition here
QADA vs UBER Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 147.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while UBER trades at $71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check UBER's competition here
QADA vs SHOP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SHOP trades at $111.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 120.84. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SHOP's competition here
QADA vs APP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while APP trades at $367.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check APP's competition here
QADA vs INTU Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while INTU trades at $348.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check INTU's competition here
QADA vs NOW Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while NOW trades at $84.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 53.77. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check NOW's competition here
QADA vs CDNS Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CDNS trades at $274.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CDNS's competition here
QADA vs ADSK Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ADSK trades at $215.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ADSK's competition here
QADA vs SNOW Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SNOW trades at $123.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -33.49. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SNOW's competition here
QADA vs DDOG Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DDOG trades at $102.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 351.55. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DDOG's competition here
QADA vs MSTR Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while MSTR trades at $128.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check MSTR's competition here
QADA vs ANSS Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ANSS's competition here
QADA vs WDAY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while WDAY trades at $111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check WDAY's competition here
QADA vs STRC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while STRC trades at $100.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check STRC's competition here
QADA vs STRF Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while STRF trades at $97.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check STRF's competition here
QADA vs GTOP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GTOP trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GTOP's competition here
QADA vs FICO Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while FICO trades at $998.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 39.76. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check FICO's competition here
QADA vs ZM Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ZM trades at $80.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ZM's competition here
QADA vs STRK Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while STRK trades at $72.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check STRK's competition here
QADA vs BVC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, BVC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while BVC trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVC's P/E ratio is -149.21. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BVC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to BVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check BVC's competition here
QADA vs AZPN Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check AZPN's competition here
QADA vs SSNC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SSNC trades at $66.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SSNC's competition here
QADA vs PTC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PTC trades at $135.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PTC's competition here
QADA vs TEAM Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while TEAM trades at $56.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -81.89. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check TEAM's competition here
QADA vs GRAB Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GRAB trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 61.33. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GRAB's competition here
QADA vs TYL Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while TYL trades at $319.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check TYL's competition here
QADA vs BKI Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check BKI's competition here
QADA vs DAY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA and DAY have similar daily volatility (0.34).Check DAY's competition here
QADA vs XM Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check XM's competition here
QADA vs CDAY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CDAY's competition here
QADA vs HUBS Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while HUBS trades at $194.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 241.26. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check HUBS's competition here
QADA vs GWRE Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GWRE trades at $122.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GWRE's competition here
QADA vs DT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DT trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 56.36. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DT's competition here
QADA vs TTD Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while TTD trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check TTD's competition here
QADA vs BSY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while BSY trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 39.35. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check BSY's competition here
QADA vs U Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while U trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -22.47. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to U's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check U's competition here
QADA vs FIG Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while FIG trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check FIG's competition here
QADA vs IDCC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while IDCC trades at $353.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check IDCC's competition here
QADA vs DOCU Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DOCU trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DOCU's competition here
QADA vs OCFT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check OCFT's competition here
QADA vs YMM Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while YMM trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check YMM's competition here
QADA vs NATI Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check NATI's competition here
QADA vs SMAR Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SMAR's competition here
QADA vs PCOR Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PCOR trades at $47.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -74.60. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PCOR's competition here
QADA vs MANH Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while MANH trades at $121.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check MANH's competition here
QADA vs CWAN Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CWAN trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -171.14. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CWAN's competition here
QADA vs PEGA Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PEGA trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PEGA's competition here
QADA vs NICE Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while NICE trades at $101.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check NICE's competition here
QADA vs PAYC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PAYC trades at $112.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PAYC's competition here
QADA vs COUP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check COUP's competition here
QADA vs OS Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while OS trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check OS's competition here
QADA vs TTAN Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while TTAN trades at $56.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -33.97. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check TTAN's competition here
QADA vs DSGX Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DSGX trades at $63.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DSGX's competition here
QADA vs APPF Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while APPF trades at $145.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check APPF's competition here
QADA vs FROG Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while FROG trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -71.71. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check FROG's competition here
QADA vs LYFT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while LYFT trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check LYFT's competition here
QADA vs PCTY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PCTY trades at $94.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PCTY's competition here
QADA vs OTEX Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while OTEX trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check OTEX's competition here
QADA vs YOU Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while YOU trades at $47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 43.74. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check YOU's competition here
QADA vs ESTC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ESTC trades at $42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -56.96. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ESTC's competition here
QADA vs SRAD Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SRAD trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SRAD's competition here
QADA vs FSLY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while FSLY trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -35.49. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check FSLY's competition here
QADA vs GRND-WT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GRND-WT's competition here
QADA vs KC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while KC trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -29.66. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check KC's competition here
QADA vs DUOL Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DUOL trades at $90.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DUOL's competition here
QADA vs CVT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CVT's competition here
QADA vs PYCR Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PYCR's competition here
QADA vs COMP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while COMP trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -72.25. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check COMP's competition here
QADA vs PWSC Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check PWSC's competition here
QADA vs ZETA Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ZETA trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -109.36. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ZETA's competition here
QADA vs BILL Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while BILL trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -157.39. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check BILL's competition here
QADA vs CVLT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CVLT trades at $78.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CVLT's competition here
QADA vs AYX Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check AYX's competition here
QADA vs ENV Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ENV's competition here
QADA vs INST Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check INST's competition here
QADA vs ZI Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ZI's competition here
QADA vs GTLB Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GTLB trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -57.85. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GTLB's competition here
QADA vs LIF Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while LIF trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check LIF's competition here
QADA vs RNG Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while RNG trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 76.85. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check RNG's competition here
QADA vs NATL Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while NATL trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check NATL's competition here
QADA vs CALX Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CALX trades at $48.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 190.15. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CALX's competition here
QADA vs MNDY Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while MNDY trades at $60.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check MNDY's competition here
QADA vs WK Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while WK trades at $54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -118.27. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WK's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check WK's competition here
QADA vs DBD Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DBD trades at $83.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DBD's competition here
QADA vs ADEA Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while ADEA trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check ADEA's competition here
QADA vs GBTG Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GBTG trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GBTG's competition here
QADA vs NAVN Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while NAVN trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check NAVN's competition here
QADA vs QTWO Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while QTWO trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 57.56. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check QTWO's competition here
QADA vs SOUN Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SOUN trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SOUN's competition here
QADA vs CLSK Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while CLSK trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check CLSK's competition here
QADA vs BULL Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while BULL trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check BULL's competition here
QADA vs DCT Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DCT's competition here
QADA vs SPNS Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while SPNS trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check SPNS's competition here
QADA vs DAVE Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while DAVE trades at $177.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check DAVE's competition here
QADA vs NP Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while NP trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -95.69. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check NP's competition here
QADA vs BRZE Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while BRZE trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check BRZE's competition here
QADA vs FRSH Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while FRSH trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check FRSH's competition here
QADA vs GRND Comparison April 2026
QADA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QADA stands at 0. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QADA is priced at $87.65, while GRND trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QADA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, QADA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRND's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QADA is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QADA.Check GRND's competition here