Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation PPC Peers
See (PPC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | $44.60 | -0.69% | 10.6B | 8.77 | $5.08 | +14.12% |
| KHC | $25.81 | +0.31% | 30.5B | 11.78 | $2.19 | +6.21% |
| GIS | $50.78 | +0.20% | 27.6B | 12.28 | $4.10 | +4.76% |
| MKC | $77.01 | +4.57% | 20.8B | 26.74 | $2.90 | +2.24% |
| MKC-V | $76.65 | +4.41% | 20.8B | 26.63 | $2.90 | +2.24% |
| HRL | $30.40 | +1.88% | 16.6B | 22.24 | $1.36 | +3.79% |
| SJM | $96.15 | +0.45% | 10.2B | -8.31 | -$11.57 | +4.51% |
| CAG | $20.55 | +0.46% | 9.8B | 30.12 | $0.68 | +6.84% |
| CPB | $31.12 | -0.19% | 9.2B | 20.65 | $1.50 | +4.90% |
| INGR | $135.95 | +1.43% | 8.7B | 14.28 | $9.48 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
PPC vs KHC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while KHC trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs GIS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while GIS trades at $50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MKC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while MKC trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MKC-V Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while MKC-V trades at $76.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HRL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while HRL trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SJM Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SJM trades at $96.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CAG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while CAG trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CPB Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while CPB trades at $31.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs INGR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while INGR trades at $135.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while LW trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRBR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRBR trades at $58.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs DAR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while DAR trades at $37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs POST Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while POST trades at $108.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRFS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRFS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LANC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while LANC trades at $172.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs TWNK Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs TWNKW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FLO Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FLO trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FRPT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FRPT trades at $67.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 227.53. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SMPL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SMPL trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NOMD Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while NOMD trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SOVO Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs JJSF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while JJSF trades at $114.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CENTA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while CENTA trades at $31.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CENT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while CENT trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs KLG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while KLG trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs UTZ Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while UTZ trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs THS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 997.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while THS trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 197.60. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HLF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while HLF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs JBSS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while JBSS trades at $63.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs STKL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while STKL trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SENEA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 689.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SENEA trades at $99.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SENEB Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SENEB trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs USNA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 574.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while USNA trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs WEST Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while WEST trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs THRN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LWAY Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while LWAY trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BGS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BGS trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MAMA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while MAMA trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 73.73. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NATR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while NATR trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRCC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRCC trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BYND Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BYND trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FREE Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs WESTW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LFVN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while LFVN trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MMMB Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HAIN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while HAIN trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FTLF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FTLF trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PLIN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRLS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRLS trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ABVEW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRID Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRID trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LSF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while LSF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -68.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ATPC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while ATPC trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ABVE Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while ABVE trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MITC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs WYHG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while WYHG trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PAVS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while PAVS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs DDC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while DDC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CLXT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HAPP Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FARM Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FARM trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs JVA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while JVA trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs YGF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs COOT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while COOT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BOF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BOF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NAII Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while NAII trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC and NAII have similar daily volatility (1.31).
PPC vs NCRA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while NCRA trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs STKH Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while STKH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs TTCF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ORIS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while ORIS trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs IMG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while IMG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PETZ Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while PETZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BON Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BON trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SOWG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SOWG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HCWC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while HCWC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NUZE Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PLAG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while PLAG trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BTTR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FREEW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CYAN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while CYAN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FAMI Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while FAMI trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs RGF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRLSW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRLSW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BTOG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BTOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SNAX Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 827.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SNAX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BSFC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 778.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SMFL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 283.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SMFL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SNAXW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs RIBT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SAFM Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs DTEA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRCN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs VGFC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.6B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $44.60, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.77, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.