Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation PPC Peers
See (PPC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | $46.31 | -1.61% | 10.98B | 9.12 | $5.08 | +13.63% |
| KHC | $28.15 | +0.28% | 33.32B | 12.85 | $2.19 | +5.72% |
| GIS | $54.84 | +0.62% | 30.03B | 12.05 | $4.55 | +4.40% |
| MKC | $76.49 | +0.55% | 20.52B | 26.38 | $2.90 | +2.28% |
| MKC-V | $76.19 | -0.58% | 20.29B | 26.27 | $2.90 | +2.28% |
| HRL | $29.57 | +1.23% | 16.26B | 21.43 | $1.38 | +3.89% |
| SJM | $114.83 | -1.24% | 12.22B | -47.65 | -$2.41 | +3.83% |
| CAG | $23.31 | +0.93% | 11.12B | 34.27 | $0.68 | +6.04% |
| CPB | $35.94 | +1.76% | 10.72B | 20.77 | $1.73 | +4.24% |
| INGR | $137.21 | +0.04% | 8.82B | 14.47 | $9.48 | +2.32% |
Stock Comparison
PPC vs KHC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 33.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while KHC trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs GIS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 30.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while GIS trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MKC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while MKC trades at $76.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MKC-V Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while MKC-V trades at $76.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HRL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while HRL trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SJM Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SJM trades at $114.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CAG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while CAG trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CPB Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 10.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while CPB trades at $35.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs INGR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while INGR trades at $137.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRBR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 8.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BRBR trades at $65.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while LW trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs POST Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while POST trades at $109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs DAR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while DAR trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRFS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BRFS trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LANC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while LANC trades at $170.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs TWNK Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs TWNKW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FRPT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while FRPT trades at $79.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 265.40. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FLO Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while FLO trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SMPL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SMPL trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NOMD Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while NOMD trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SOVO Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs JJSF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while JJSF trades at $119.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CENTA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while CENTA trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CENT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while CENT trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs KLG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while KLG trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs THS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while THS trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 230.70. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs UTZ Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while UTZ trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs STKL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 756.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while STKL trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -64.40. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs JBSS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 738.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while JBSS trades at $62.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HLF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 720.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while HLF trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs WEST Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 696.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while WEST trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SENEB Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 606.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SENEB trades at $88.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SENEA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 604.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SENEA trades at $87.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs USNA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 558.79M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while USNA trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs THRN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs WYHG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 475.63M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while WYHG trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WYHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LWAY Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 371.11M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while LWAY trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BGS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 359.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BGS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NATR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 264.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while NATR trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MAMA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 249.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while MAMA trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 73.78. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FREE Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BYND Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 176.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BYND trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs WESTW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HAIN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 159.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while HAIN trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LFVN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 149.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while LFVN trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRCC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 139.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BRCC trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MMMB Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRLS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 125.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BRLS trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PLIN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ATPC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 82.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while ATPC trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs LSF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 79.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while LSF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -41.94. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRID Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 70.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BRID trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PAVS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 64.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while PAVS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs MITC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.47M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FARM Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 36.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while FARM trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CLXT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HAPP Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ABVE Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 30.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while ABVE trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs YGF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.47M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ORIS Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 21.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while ORIS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BOF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 20.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BOF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BOF's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NAII Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 19.96M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while NAII trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs JVA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 19.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while JVA trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs COOT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 18.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while COOT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs TTCF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NCRA Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 13.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while NCRA trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PLAG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 11.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while PLAG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLAG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs DDC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 9.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while DDC trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs HCWC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while HCWC trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs PETZ Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 9.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while PETZ trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs NUZE Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -16.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs IMG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 5.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while IMG trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BTTR Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs CYAN Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while CYAN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FREEW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs STKH Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while STKH trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BRLSW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BRLSW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs FAMI Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while FAMI trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs RGF Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SNAX Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SNAX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs ABVEW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while ABVEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BTOG Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BTOG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BSFC Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BSFC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs BON Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 301975.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while BON trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SNAXW Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15358.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs RIBT Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 4002.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.
PPC vs SMFL Comparison
PPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPC stands at 10.98B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, PPC is priced at $46.31, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.12, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPC's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PPC is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPC.