Moatable, Inc.
Moatable, Inc. MTBL Peers
See (MTBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTBL | $0.45 | -30.60% | 10.4M | -0.49 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| SAP | $296.93 | -0.38% | 346.4B | 53.79 | $5.52 | +0.89% |
| CRM | $266.96 | -3.29% | 256.1B | 42.04 | $6.35 | +0.61% |
| INTU | $757.20 | +0.36% | 211.2B | 61.96 | $12.22 | +0.53% |
| NOW | $1,015.32 | -0.59% | 210.2B | 137.21 | $7.40 | N/A |
| UBER | $84.31 | -4.48% | 176.3B | 14.77 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $107.70 | +0.55% | 140.6B | 87.56 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $384.23 | -1.55% | 130B | 69.61 | $5.52 | N/A |
| MSTR | $370.63 | +1.75% | 101.2B | -16.65 | -$22.26 | N/A |
| CDNS | $284.50 | -1.42% | 77.7B | 72.03 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTBL vs SAP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 346.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SAP trades at $296.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CRM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 256.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CRM trades at $266.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs INTU Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 211.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while INTU trades at $757.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 61.96. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NOW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 210.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NOW trades at $1,015.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs UBER Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 176.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while UBER trades at $84.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SHOP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SHOP trades at $107.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 87.56. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs APP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while APP trades at $384.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 69.61. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs MSTR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while MSTR trades at $370.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.65. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CDNS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CDNS trades at $284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 72.03. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SNOW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SNOW trades at $202.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -48.04. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs WDAY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while WDAY trades at $241.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 134.31. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ADSK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ADSK trades at $297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 63.60. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TEAM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TEAM trades at $203.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.59. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs FICO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while FICO trades at $1,685.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 72.75. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DDOG Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DDOG trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 248.94. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TTD Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TTD trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 91.34. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs HUBS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while HUBS trades at $577.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1343.44. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ANSS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ANSS trades at $328.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 48.63. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs STRK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while STRK trades at $101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs STRF Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while STRF trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TYL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TYL trades at $571.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ZM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ZM trades at $79.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DUOL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DUOL trades at $513.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 250.44. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PTC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PTC trades at $168.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SSNC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SSNC trades at $80.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GRAB Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GRAB trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 488.50. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GWRE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GWRE trades at $211.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1006.24. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DOCU Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DOCU trades at $85.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs AZPN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DT trades at $53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs MNDY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while MNDY trades at $293.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 290.29. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PAYC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PAYC trades at $255.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BSY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BSY trades at $47.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.51. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BKI Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs MANH Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while MANH trades at $188.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 53.97. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs XM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CDAY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NICE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NICE trades at $167.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PCTY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PCTY trades at $189.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TTAN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TTAN trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PCOR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PCOR trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.22. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs QXO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while QXO trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -48.93. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs U Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while U trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.23. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DSGX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DSGX trades at $113.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ESTC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ESTC trades at $91.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -70.22. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DAY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DAY trades at $57.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 360.63. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PEGA Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PEGA trades at $96.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 44.63. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NATI Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SMAR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CVLT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CVLT trades at $177.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 105.58. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GTLB Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GTLB trades at $45.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1142.00. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs APPF Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while APPF trades at $209.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SRAD Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SRAD trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 126.42. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs OTEX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while OTEX trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs LYFT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while LYFT trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 102.30. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CWAN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CWAN trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs VERX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while VERX trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -136.24. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs COUP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SYT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SYT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ETWO-WT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BULL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BULL trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs IDCC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while IDCC trades at $214.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs QTWO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while QTWO trades at $86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -255.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs FROG Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while FROG trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.38. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs LIF Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while LIF trades at $63.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 484.92. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GRND Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GRND trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.90. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BILL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BILL trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2169.50. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs FRSH Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while FRSH trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -59.96. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs INTA Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while INTA trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -226.92. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ASAN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ASAN trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SOUN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SOUN trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.26. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CVT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PYCR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs RUM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while RUM trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BRZE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BRZE trades at $36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs RUMBW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while RUMBW trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PWSC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ZI Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs WK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while WK trades at $66.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.55. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs AYX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ENV Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs INST Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BL trades at $55.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DAVEW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DAVEW trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ZETA Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ZETA trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -52.40. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs COMP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while COMP trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -44.92. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NCNO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NCNO trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -79.79. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CALX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CALX trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -89.85. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BLKB Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BLKB trades at $61.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GBTG Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GBTG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -62.35. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs AGYS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while AGYS trades at $106.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 129.62. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ALKT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ALKT trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -77.51. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs RIOT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while RIOT trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ALIT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ALIT trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -92.25. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ALRM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ALRM trades at $57.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BTDR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BTDR trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DAVE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DAVE trades at $208.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PAR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PAR trades at $65.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -25.60. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PRGS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PRGS trades at $61.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.