Moatable, Inc.
Moatable, Inc. MTBL Peers
See (MTBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTBL | $0.45 | -30.60% | 10.4M | -0.49 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| SAP | $302.07 | +2.99% | 344.8B | 52.97 | $5.58 | +0.89% |
| CRM | $272.54 | +1.78% | 258.8B | 42.43 | $6.38 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $786.94 | +3.84% | 215.6B | 63.09 | $12.25 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $1,025.38 | +2.01% | 209.4B | 137.17 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $90.46 | -0.48% | 194.7B | 16.30 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $114.98 | +0.96% | 147.2B | 91.93 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $340.69 | +0.56% | 117.5B | 62.81 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $393.98 | +1.36% | 105.7B | -17.37 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $311.09 | +4.56% | 82.9B | 76.88 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTBL vs SAP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 344.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SAP trades at $302.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.97. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CRM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 258.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CRM trades at $272.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs INTU Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 215.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while INTU trades at $786.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.09. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NOW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NOW trades at $1,025.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.17. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs UBER Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while UBER trades at $90.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SHOP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SHOP trades at $114.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 91.93. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs APP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while APP trades at $340.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 62.81. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs MSTR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while MSTR trades at $393.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CDNS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CDNS trades at $311.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 76.88. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SNOW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SNOW trades at $222.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.80. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ADSK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ADSK trades at $309.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.30. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs WDAY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while WDAY trades at $238.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 131.06. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TEAM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TEAM trades at $205.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -120.30. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DDOG Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DDOG trades at $133.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 278.98. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs FICO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while FICO trades at $1,865.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 78.05. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TTD Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TTD trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 82.95. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ANSS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ANSS trades at $349.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs HUBS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while HUBS trades at $549.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1274.22. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs STRK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while STRK trades at $105.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs STRF Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while STRF trades at $104.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TYL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TYL trades at $584.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.82. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ZM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ZM trades at $77.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PTC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PTC trades at $170.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.58. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SSNC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SSNC trades at $82.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GWRE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GWRE trades at $234.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 546.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GRAB Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GRAB trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 466.50. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DUOL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DUOL trades at $403.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 197.36. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs AZPN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DT trades at $55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs MNDY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while MNDY trades at $308.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 302.50. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BSY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BSY trades at $53.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 67.47. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DOCU Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DOCU trades at $76.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PAYC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PAYC trades at $227.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs QXO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while QXO trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.03. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BKI Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs MANH Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while MANH trades at $196.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs XM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CDAY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NICE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NICE trades at $165.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PCOR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PCOR trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.98. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PCTY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PCTY trades at $179.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs U Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while U trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs TTAN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while TTAN trades at $108.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DAY Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DAY trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 344.38. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DSGX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DSGX trades at $103.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.87. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ESTC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ESTC trades at $83.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -79.42. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SRAD Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SRAD trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 135.60. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs APPF Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while APPF trades at $226.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NATI Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SMAR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CVLT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CVLT trades at $177.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 103.53. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs OTEX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while OTEX trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GTLB Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GTLB trades at $45.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 491.44. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs LYFT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while LYFT trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 105.67. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CWAN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CWAN trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs COUP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs QTWO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while QTWO trades at $94.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -278.68. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs IDCC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while IDCC trades at $229.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs VERX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while VERX trades at $33.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -117.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BULL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BULL trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs FROG Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while FROG trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.10. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ETWO-WT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs LIF Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while LIF trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 470.46. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BILL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BILL trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2264.50. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PEGA Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PEGA trades at $53.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GRND Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GRND trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs FRSH Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while FRSH trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.75. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CVT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs RUMBW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while RUMBW trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs INTA Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while INTA trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -212.83. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PYCR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs RUM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while RUM trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs SOUN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while SOUN trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.26. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PWSC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ZI Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs RIOT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while RIOT trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs WK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while WK trades at $66.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -56.73. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ZETA Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ZETA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -61.30. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs AYX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BL Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BL trades at $56.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs KC Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while KC trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DAVEW Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DAVEW trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ENV Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs INST Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs AGYS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while AGYS trades at $117.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 144.22. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs COMP Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while COMP trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.54. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CALX Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CALX trades at $50.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -96.35. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs DAVE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while DAVE trades at $252.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 67.96. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs NCNO Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while NCNO trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -109.48. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ASAN Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ASAN trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BLKB Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BLKB trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ALKT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ALKT trades at $30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.38. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs CLSK Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while CLSK trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs GBTG Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while GBTG trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.35. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ALIT Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ALIT trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs BRZE Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while BRZE trades at $26.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs ALRM Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while ALRM trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PAR Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PAR trades at $67.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.
MTBL vs PRGS Comparison
MTBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTBL stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTBL is priced at $0.45, while PRGS trades at $64.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTBL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.49, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, MTBL's ROE is N/A, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTBL is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTBL.