McCormick & Company, Incorporated
McCormick & Company, Incorporated MKC Peers
See (MKC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKC | $74.80 | -2.21% | 20.07B | 25.79 | $2.90 | +2.28% |
| KHC | $27.59 | -1.99% | 32.65B | 12.60 | $2.19 | +5.72% |
| GIS | $53.78 | -1.93% | 29.45B | 11.82 | $4.55 | +4.40% |
| MKC-V | $75.50 | -0.92% | 20.32B | 26.03 | $2.90 | +2.28% |
| HRL | $29.26 | -0.98% | 16.09B | 21.20 | $1.38 | +3.89% |
| SJM | $114.83 | -1.24% | 12.22B | -47.65 | -$2.41 | +3.83% |
| PPC | $46.63 | +0.69% | 11.06B | 9.18 | $5.08 | +13.63% |
| CAG | $22.80 | -2.19% | 10.88B | 33.53 | $0.68 | +6.04% |
| CPB | $35.18 | -2.11% | 10.49B | 20.34 | $1.73 | +4.24% |
| INGR | $137.72 | +0.35% | 8.86B | 14.53 | $9.48 | +2.32% |
Stock Comparison
MKC vs KHC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while KHC trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs GIS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 29.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while GIS trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MKC-V Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while MKC-V trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HRL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while HRL trades at $29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SJM Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SJM trades at $114.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PPC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while PPC trades at $46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CAG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while CAG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CPB Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 10.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while CPB trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs INGR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while INGR trades at $137.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRBR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 8.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BRBR trades at $63.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while LW trades at $51.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs POST Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while POST trades at $108.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRFS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BRFS trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs DAR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while DAR trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LANC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while LANC trades at $167.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs TWNK Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs TWNKW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FRPT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while FRPT trades at $77.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 257.70. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FLO Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while FLO trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SMPL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SMPL trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NOMD Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while NOMD trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SOVO Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs JJSF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while JJSF trades at $116.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CENTA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while CENTA trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CENT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while CENT trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs KLG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while KLG trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs THS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while THS trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 233.75. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs UTZ Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while UTZ trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs STKL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 741.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while STKL trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -63.10. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs JBSS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 736.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while JBSS trades at $62.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs WEST Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 709.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while WEST trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HLF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 694.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while HLF trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SENEB Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 608.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SENEB trades at $89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SENEA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 603.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SENEA trades at $87.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs USNA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 553.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while USNA trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs THRN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs WYHG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 490.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while WYHG trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WYHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BGS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 342.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BGS trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LWAY Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 340.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while LWAY trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NATR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 262.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while NATR trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MAMA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 249.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while MAMA trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 73.78. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC and MAMA have similar daily volatility (3.63).
MKC vs FREE Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BYND Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 191.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BYND trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs WESTW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HAIN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 157.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while HAIN trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LFVN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 152.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while LFVN trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRCC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 144.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BRCC trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MMMB Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRLS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 129.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BRLS trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PLIN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ATPC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 101.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while ATPC trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LSF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 78.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while LSF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRID Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 69.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BRID trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PAVS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 64.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while PAVS trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MITC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ABVE Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 39.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while ABVE trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FARM Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 35.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while FARM trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CLXT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HAPP Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ORIS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 29.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while ORIS trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs YGF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BOF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 21.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BOF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOF's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NAII Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 20.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while NAII trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs JVA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 20.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while JVA trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs COOT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while COOT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PLAG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 15.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while PLAG trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLAG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NCRA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while NCRA trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs TTCF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs DDC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 11.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while DDC trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PETZ Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 9.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while PETZ trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HCWC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while HCWC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NUZE Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -16.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs IMG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 6.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while IMG trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BTTR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FREEW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ABVEW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while ABVEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CYAN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while CYAN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FAMI Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while FAMI trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRLSW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BRLSW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs STKH Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 2.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while STKH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs RGF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SNAX Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SNAX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BTOG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BTOG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BSFC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BSFC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BON Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 275187.00. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while BON trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SNAXW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 30049.00. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs RIBT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 4002.00. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SMFL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 20.07B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 285.00. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $74.80, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.79, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.