McCormick & Company, Incorporated
McCormick & Company, Incorporated MKC Peers
See (MKC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKC | $72.50 | +2.49% | 19.5B | 25.28 | $2.87 | +2.44% |
| KHC | $28.78 | +4.75% | 34.1B | 13.14 | $2.19 | +5.58% |
| GIS | $50.95 | +3.61% | 27.6B | 12.42 | $4.10 | +4.73% |
| MKC-V | $72.43 | +2.36% | 19.4B | 25.24 | $2.87 | +2.44% |
| HRL | $29.45 | +1.94% | 16.2B | 21.65 | $1.36 | +3.92% |
| SJM | $109.34 | +3.92% | 11.7B | -9.45 | -$11.57 | +3.97% |
| PPC | $47.00 | +2.78% | 11.1B | 9.25 | $5.08 | +13.39% |
| CPB | $32.21 | +4.63% | 9.6B | 21.47 | $1.50 | +4.81% |
| CAG | $19.40 | +3.47% | 9.3B | 8.09 | $2.40 | +7.24% |
| INGR | $134.06 | +0.75% | 8.6B | 14.15 | $9.48 | +2.39% |
Stock Comparison
MKC vs KHC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while KHC trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs GIS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while GIS trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MKC-V Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while MKC-V trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HRL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while HRL trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SJM Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SJM trades at $109.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PPC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while PPC trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CPB Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while CPB trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CAG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while CAG trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs INGR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while INGR trades at $134.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRBR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRBR trades at $55.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while LW trades at $49.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRFS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRFS trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs POST Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while POST trades at $108.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs DAR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while DAR trades at $36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LANC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs TWNK Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs TWNKW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FRPT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FRPT trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 244.13. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FLO Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FLO trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SMPL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SMPL trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NOMD Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while NOMD trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CENTA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while CENTA trades at $36.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CENT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while CENT trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SOVO Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs JJSF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while JJSF trades at $117.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs KLG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while KLG trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs UTZ Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while UTZ trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 43.77. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs THS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while THS trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 208.50. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HLF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 978.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while HLF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs JBSS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 804.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while JBSS trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs STKL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while STKL trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -73.22. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SENEB Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SENEB trades at $103.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SENEA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SENEA trades at $103.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs WEST Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 648.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while WEST trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs USNA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 587.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while USNA trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs THRN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRCC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 406.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRCC trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -21.28. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LWAY Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 379.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while LWAY trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BGS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BGS trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MAMA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 346M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while MAMA trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 83.64. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BYND Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BYND trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NATR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while NATR trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FREE Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs DDC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 172.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while DDC trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs WESTW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HAIN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while HAIN trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LFVN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while LFVN trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MMMB Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FTLF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FTLF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ABVE Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 118.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while ABVE trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PLIN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ABVEW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while ABVEW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs LSF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while LSF trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -80.33. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRID Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRID trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ATPC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while ATPC trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs WYHG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while WYHG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRLS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRLS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PAVS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while PAVS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs MITC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BTOG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BTOG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FARM Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FARM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CLXT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HAPP Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs JVA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while JVA trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BOF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BOF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs YGF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NAII Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while NAII trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NCRA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while NCRA trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs COOT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while COOT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs TTCF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PLAG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while PLAG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs RGF Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs PETZ Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while PETZ trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BON Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BON trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SOWG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SOWG trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs IMG Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while IMG trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs NUZE Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs HCWC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while HCWC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BTTR Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs ORIS Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while ORIS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs CYAN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while CYAN trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FREEW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs FAMI Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while FAMI trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRLSW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRLSW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs STKH Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while STKH trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BSFC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 807.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SMFL Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 149.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SMFL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SNAX Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 65.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SNAX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SNAXW Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs RIBT Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs DTEA Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs BRCN Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs VGFC Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.
MKC vs SAFM Comparison
MKC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC stands at 19.5B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC is priced at $72.50, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.28, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, MKC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC.