McCormick & Company, Incorporated
McCormick & Company, Incorporated MKC-V Peers
See (MKC-V) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKC-V | $75.51 | -1.67% | 20.1B | 26.31 | $2.87 | +2.30% |
| KHC | $25.82 | +0.82% | 30.6B | 11.79 | $2.19 | +6.21% |
| GIS | $51.81 | +2.55% | 28.4B | 12.63 | $4.10 | +4.64% |
| MKC | $75.82 | -0.64% | 20.3B | 26.41 | $2.87 | +2.30% |
| HRL | $30.25 | -0.72% | 16.6B | 22.24 | $1.36 | +3.79% |
| PPC | $44.98 | +0.94% | 10.7B | 8.85 | $5.08 | +14.02% |
| SJM | $98.20 | +2.69% | 10.5B | -8.49 | -$11.57 | +4.40% |
| CAG | $20.47 | +0.34% | 9.8B | 30.08 | $0.68 | +6.84% |
| CPB | $30.65 | -0.45% | 9.1B | 20.43 | $1.50 | +4.96% |
| INGR | $135.62 | -0.18% | 8.7B | 14.30 | $9.48 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
MKC-V vs KHC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while KHC trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs GIS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while GIS trades at $51.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs MKC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while MKC trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs HRL Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while HRL trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs PPC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while PPC trades at $44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SJM Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SJM trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs CAG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while CAG trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs CPB Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while CPB trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs INGR Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while INGR trades at $135.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRBR Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRBR trades at $57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs LW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while LW trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs POST Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while POST trades at $109.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs DAR Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while DAR trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRFS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRFS trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs LANC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs TWNK Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs TWNKW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FLO Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FLO trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FRPT Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FRPT trades at $67.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 226.53. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SMPL Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SMPL trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs NOMD Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while NOMD trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SOVO Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs JJSF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while JJSF trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs CENTA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while CENTA trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs CENT Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while CENT trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs KLG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while KLG trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs UTZ Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while UTZ trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs THS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 981.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while THS trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 194.30. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs HLF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 877.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while HLF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs JBSS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 743.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while JBSS trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SENEA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 702.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SENEA trades at $101.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SENEB Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SENEB trades at $101.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs STKL Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 681.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while STKL trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -64.44. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs USNA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 568.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while USNA trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs THRN Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs WEST Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 542.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while WEST trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs LWAY Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while LWAY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BGS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 337.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BGS trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs MAMA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while MAMA trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRCC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRCC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs NATR Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while NATR trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BYND Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BYND trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FREE Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V and FREE have similar daily volatility (0.21).
MKC-V vs WESTW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs LFVN Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while LFVN trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs HAIN Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while HAIN trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs MMMB Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FTLF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FTLF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs PLIN Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRLS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRLS trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs ABVEW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs WYHG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while WYHG trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRID Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRID trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs LSF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while LSF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -70.44. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs ATPC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while ATPC trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs MITC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs ABVE Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while ABVE trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs PAVS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while PAVS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs DDC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while DDC trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs CLXT Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs HAPP Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FARM Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FARM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs JVA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while JVA trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs YGF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BOF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BOF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs COOT Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while COOT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs NAII Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while NAII trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs NCRA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while NCRA trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs TTCF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs STKH Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while STKH trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs ORIS Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while ORIS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs IMG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while IMG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs PETZ Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while PETZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SOWG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SOWG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BON Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BON trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs HCWC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while HCWC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs NUZE Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs PLAG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while PLAG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BTTR Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FREEW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs CYAN Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while CYAN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs FAMI Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while FAMI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs RGF Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRLSW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRLSW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BTOG Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BTOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SNAX Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 958.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SNAX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BSFC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 816.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SMFL Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 70.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SMFL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SNAXW Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs RIBT Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs BRCN Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs SAFM Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs VGFC Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.
MKC-V vs DTEA Comparison
MKC-V plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKC-V stands at 20.1B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKC-V is priced at $75.51, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKC-V currently has a P/E ratio of 26.31, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MKC-V's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKC-V is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKC-V.