MeaTech 3D Ltd.
MeaTech 3D Ltd. MITC Peers
See (MITC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MITC | $3.34 | -1.47% | 57.5M | -2.15 | -$1.55 | N/A |
| KHC | $26.08 | -1.44% | 30.9B | 11.91 | $2.19 | +6.12% |
| GIS | $53.56 | -2.16% | 29.3B | 11.77 | $4.55 | +4.47% |
| MKC | $74.02 | -2.36% | 19.8B | 25.52 | $2.90 | +2.35% |
| MKC-V | $73.15 | -3.34% | 19.6B | 25.22 | $2.90 | +2.35% |
| HRL | $30.58 | -1.51% | 16.8B | 22.49 | $1.36 | +3.74% |
| PPC | $46.17 | +0.93% | 10.9B | 9.09 | $5.08 | +13.67% |
| CAG | $21.57 | -3.19% | 10.3B | 31.72 | $0.68 | +6.48% |
| SJM | $95.72 | -1.69% | 10.2B | -8.27 | -$11.57 | +4.50% |
| CPB | $32.79 | -1.61% | 9.8B | 22.00 | $1.49 | +4.61% |
Stock Comparison
MITC vs KHC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while KHC trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs GIS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while GIS trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs MKC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while MKC trades at $74.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs MKC-V Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while MKC-V trades at $73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs HRL Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while HRL trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs PPC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while PPC trades at $46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs CAG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while CAG trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SJM Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SJM trades at $95.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs CPB Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while CPB trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs INGR Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while INGR trades at $138.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs LW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while LW trades at $54.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRBR Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRBR trades at $58.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs POST Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while POST trades at $112.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRFS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRFS trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs DAR Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while DAR trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs LANC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while LANC trades at $167.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs TWNK Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs TWNKW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FRPT Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FRPT trades at $74.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 247.80. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FLO Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FLO trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SMPL Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SMPL trades at $32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs NOMD Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while NOMD trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SOVO Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs JJSF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while JJSF trades at $115.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs CENTA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while CENTA trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs CENT Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while CENT trades at $34.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs KLG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while KLG trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs UTZ Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while UTZ trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs THS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while THS trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 207.15. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs HLF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 801.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while HLF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs JBSS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 733.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while JBSS trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs STKL Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while STKL trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -66.22. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs WEST Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while WEST trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SENEB Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 622.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SENEB trades at $91.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SENEA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 622.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SENEA trades at $90.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs USNA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while USNA trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs THRN Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs LWAY Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while LWAY trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BGS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BGS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs MAMA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 298.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while MAMA trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 72.09. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs NATR Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while NATR trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BYND Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BYND trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FREE Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs WESTW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs LFVN Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while LFVN trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs HAIN Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while HAIN trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs MMMB Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FTLF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FTLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRCC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRCC trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs PLIN Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRLS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRLS trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs ATPC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while ATPC trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs WYHG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while WYHG trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRID Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRID trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs LSF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while LSF trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -69.89. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs ABVEW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs PAVS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while PAVS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs ABVE Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while ABVE trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs DDC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while DDC trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FARM Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FARM trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs CLXT Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs HAPP Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs YGF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs JVA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while JVA trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs NAII Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while NAII trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs COOT Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while COOT trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BOF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BOF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs ORIS Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while ORIS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs PLAG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while PLAG trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs NCRA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while NCRA trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs TTCF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs STKH Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while STKH trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs PETZ Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while PETZ trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BON Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BON trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SOWG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SOWG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs HCWC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while HCWC trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs NUZE Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BTTR Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs IMG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while IMG trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRLSW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRLSW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FREEW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs CYAN Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while CYAN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs FAMI Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while FAMI trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs RGF Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BTOG Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BTOG trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SNAX Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SNAX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BSFC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 829.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SMFL Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 94.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SMFL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SNAXW Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs RIBT Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs BRCN Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs SAFM Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs VGFC Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.
MITC vs DTEA Comparison
MITC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MITC stands at 57.5M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MITC is priced at $3.34, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MITC currently has a P/E ratio of -2.15, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MITC's ROE is -1.20%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MITC is more volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MITC.