Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LW | $54.83 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 21.66 | $2.50 | +2.70% |
| KHC | $27.65 | +0.00% | 32.8B | -6.20 | -$4.46 | +5.77% |
| GIS | $49.67 | +0.00% | 26.9B | 12.11 | $4.10 | +4.85% |
| MKC-V | $69.92 | +0.00% | 18.8B | 24.36 | $2.87 | +2.53% |
| MKC | $70.19 | +0.00% | 18.7B | 24.29 | $2.87 | +2.52% |
| HRL | $28.30 | +0.00% | 15.7B | 20.94 | $1.36 | +4.04% |
| SJM | $111.44 | +0.00% | 11.8B | -9.57 | -$11.57 | +3.93% |
| PPC | $47.76 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 9.24 | $5.19 | +13.06% |
| CPB | $32.40 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 21.67 | $1.50 | +4.73% |
| CAG | $19.45 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 7.99 | $2.40 | +7.29% |
Stock Comparison
LW vs KHC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while KHC trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check KHC's competition here
LW vs GIS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while GIS trades at $49.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check GIS's competition here
LW vs MKC-V Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while MKC-V trades at $69.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MKC-V's competition here
LW vs MKC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while MKC trades at $70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MKC's competition here
LW vs HRL Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while HRL trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HRL's competition here
LW vs SJM Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SJM trades at $111.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SJM's competition here
LW vs PPC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while PPC trades at $47.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PPC's competition here
LW vs CPB Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while CPB trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CPB's competition here
LW vs CAG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while CAG trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CAG's competition here
LW vs INGR Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while INGR trades at $126.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check INGR's competition here
LW vs BRFS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRFS trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRFS's competition here
LW vs POST Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while POST trades at $108.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check POST's competition here
LW vs DAR Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while DAR trades at $30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 47.95. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check DAR's competition here
LW vs BRBR Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRBR trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRBR's competition here
LW vs LANC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LANC's competition here
LW vs TWNK Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check TWNK's competition here
LW vs TWNKW Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check TWNKW's competition here
LW vs FLO Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FLO trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FLO's competition here
LW vs FRPT Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FRPT trades at $63.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 92.79. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FRPT's competition here
LW vs SMPL Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SMPL trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SMPL's competition here
LW vs SOVO Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SOVO's competition here
LW vs NOMD Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while NOMD trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NOMD's competition here
LW vs JJSF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while JJSF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JJSF's competition here
LW vs CENTA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while CENTA trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CENTA's competition here
LW vs CENT Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while CENT trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CENT's competition here
LW vs KLG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while KLG trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.74. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check KLG's competition here
LW vs UTZ Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while UTZ trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 61.57. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check UTZ's competition here
LW vs HLF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 991.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while HLF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HLF's competition here
LW vs THS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 916.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while THS trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 50.42. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check THS's competition here
LW vs JBSS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 735.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while JBSS trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JBSS's competition here
LW vs STKL Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 724.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while STKL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -306.50. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check STKL's competition here
LW vs SENEA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SENEA trades at $104.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SENEA's competition here
LW vs SENEB Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SENEB trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SENEB's competition here
LW vs WEST Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 605.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while WEST trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check WEST's competition here
LW vs USNA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 555.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while USNA trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check USNA's competition here
LW vs THRN Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check THRN's competition here
LW vs LWAY Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 453.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while LWAY trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LWAY's competition here
LW vs BGS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 337.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BGS trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BGS's competition here
LW vs BRCC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRCC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRCC's competition here
LW vs MAMA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while MAMA trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 74.27. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MAMA's competition here
LW vs NATR Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while NATR trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NATR's competition here
LW vs FREE Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FREE's competition here
LW vs BYND Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BYND trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BYND's competition here
LW vs LFVN Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while LFVN trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LFVN's competition here
LW vs WESTW Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check WESTW's competition here
LW vs HAIN Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while HAIN trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HAIN's competition here
LW vs FTLF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FTLF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FTLF's competition here
LW vs MMMB Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MMMB's competition here
LW vs PLIN Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PLIN's competition here
LW vs ABVE Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while ABVE trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ABVE's competition here
LW vs ABVEW Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while ABVEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ABVEW's competition here
LW vs DDC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while DDC trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check DDC's competition here
LW vs WYHG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while WYHG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check WYHG's competition here
LW vs BRID Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRID trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRID's competition here
LW vs BRLS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRLS trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRLS's competition here
LW vs ATPC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while ATPC trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ATPC's competition here
LW vs LSF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while LSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -58.30. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LSF's competition here
LW vs MITC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MITC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MITC's competition here
LW vs PAVS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while PAVS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PAVS's competition here
LW vs FARM Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FARM trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FARM's competition here
LW vs CLXT Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CLXT's competition here
LW vs HAPP Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HAPP's competition here
LW vs BTOG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BTOG trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BTOG's competition here
LW vs JVA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while JVA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JVA's competition here
LW vs NAII Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while NAII trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NAII's competition here
LW vs NCRA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while NCRA trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NCRA's competition here
LW vs BOF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BOF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BOF's competition here
LW vs YGF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check YGF's competition here
LW vs COOT Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while COOT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check COOT's competition here
LW vs TTCF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check TTCF's competition here
LW vs PLAG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while PLAG trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -58.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PLAG's competition here
LW vs PETZ Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while PETZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PETZ's competition here
LW vs BON Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BON trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BON's competition here
LW vs IMG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while IMG trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMG's ROE of +35.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check IMG's competition here
LW vs SOWG Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SOWG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SOWG's competition here
LW vs NUZE Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUZE's ROE of +291.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NUZE's competition here
LW vs HCWC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while HCWC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HCWC's competition here
LW vs BTTR Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BTTR's competition here
LW vs FREEW Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FREEW's competition here
LW vs ORIS Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while ORIS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ORIS's competition here
LW vs RGF Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check RGF's competition here
LW vs CYAN Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while CYAN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CYAN's competition here
LW vs FAMI Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while FAMI trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FAMI's competition here
LW vs BRLSW Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRLSW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRLSW's competition here
LW vs SNAX Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SNAX's competition here
LW vs STKH Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 751.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while STKH trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check STKH's competition here
LW vs BSFC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 462.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BSFC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BSFC's competition here
LW vs SMFL Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 44K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SMFL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SMFL's competition here
LW vs SNAXW Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SNAXW's competition here
LW vs RIBT Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check RIBT's competition here
LW vs DTEA Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check DTEA's competition here
LW vs BRCN Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRCN's competition here
LW vs SAFM Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SAFM's competition here
LW vs VGFC Comparison August 2025
LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $54.83, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LW currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check VGFC's competition here