LifeVantage Corporation

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while JBS trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check JBS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while KHC trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check KHC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while GIS trades at $44.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check GIS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MKC-V trades at $69.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MKC-V's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MKC trades at $68.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MKC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while HRL trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check HRL's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SJM trades at $109.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SJM's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MICC trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MICC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while PPC trades at $42.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check PPC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while CAG trades at $18.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -87.95. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check CAG's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while DAR trades at $51.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 132.38. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check DAR's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while CPB trades at $26.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check CPB's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while INGR trades at $116.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check INGR's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while LW trades at $48.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check LW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while POST trades at $107.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check POST's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRFS trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRFS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while LANC trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check LANC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MZTI trades at $163.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MZTI's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while TWNK trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check TWNK's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check TWNKW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FRPT trades at $74.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FRPT's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while CENT trades at $39.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check CENT's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SOVO trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SOVO's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRBR trades at $18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRBR's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while CENTA trades at $34.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check CENTA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FLO trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FLO's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while HLF trades at $19.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check HLF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while KLG trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check KLG's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while NOMD trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check NOMD's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while JJSF trades at $85.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check JJSF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SMPL trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SMPL's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while THS trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check THS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while JBSS trades at $83.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check JBSS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 906M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SENEB trades at $122.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SENEB's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 901.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SENEA trades at $126.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SENEA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 857.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while UTZ trades at $9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 970.00. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check UTZ's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while STKL trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 160.75. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check STKL's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 646M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MAMA trades at $14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 132.42. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MAMA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while THRN trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check THRN's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 477.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while WEST trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check WEST's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 470.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while NATR trades at $26.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check NATR's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 421.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BGS trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BGS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while USNA trades at $20.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check USNA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 334.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while LWAY trades at $21.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check LWAY's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BYND trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BYND's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRCC trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRCC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FREE trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FREE's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while OFRM trades at $25.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OFRM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check OFRM's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while WESTW trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check WESTW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FTLF trades at $15.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FTLF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MMMB trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MMMB's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while PLIN trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check PLIN's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while HAIN trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check HAIN's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while ABVE trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check ABVE's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRID trades at $7.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRID's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while DDC trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check DDC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MITC trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MITC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BOF trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BOF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while ORIS trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ORIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check ORIS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRLS trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRLS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FARM trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FARM's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while CLXT trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check CLXT's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while HAPP trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check HAPP's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while LSF trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check LSF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while YGF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check YGF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while ABVEW trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check ABVEW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while WYHG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +40.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check WYHG's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while PLAG trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check PLAG's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while JVA trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check JVA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while NAII trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check NAII's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while COOT trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COOT's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check COOT's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while MWYN trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check MWYN's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while TTCF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check TTCF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while PETZ trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check PETZ's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BON trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BON's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while NUZE trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check NUZE's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while NCRA trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check NCRA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SOWG trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SOWG's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BTTR trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BTTR's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while IMG trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check IMG's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while HCWC trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check HCWC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FREEW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FREEW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while CYAN trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check CYAN's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while RGF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check RGF's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while ATPC trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check ATPC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while FAMI trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check FAMI's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRLSW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRLSW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 820.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while PAVS trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check PAVS's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 126.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while STKH trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check STKH's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 26.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BSFC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BSFC's ROE of +10.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BSFC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SNAXW's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 13.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SNAX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNAX's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SNAX's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SMFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SMFL's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while RIBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check RIBT's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while VGFC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check VGFC's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while BRCN trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check BRCN's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while DTEA trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check DTEA's competition here

LFVN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFVN stands at 62M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFVN is priced at $5.06, while SAFM trades at $204.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFVN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.08, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, LFVN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFVN is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFVN.Check SAFM's competition here