WK Kellogg Co
WK Kellogg Co (KLG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KLG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLG | $23.08 | +0.13% | 2B | 35.49 | $0.65 | +2.82% |
| KHC | $27.41 | -0.18% | 32.4B | -6.15 | -$4.46 | +5.84% |
| GIS | $48.94 | -0.08% | 26.5B | 11.94 | $4.10 | +4.92% |
| MKC | $70.28 | -0.50% | 18.9B | 24.49 | $2.87 | +2.52% |
| MKC-V | $70.28 | -0.65% | 18.8B | 24.49 | $2.87 | +2.52% |
| HRL | $28.12 | +0.11% | 15.5B | 20.68 | $1.36 | +4.08% |
| SJM | $108.25 | +0.85% | 11.5B | -9.36 | -$11.57 | +4.00% |
| PPC | $47.93 | +1.14% | 11.4B | 9.23 | $5.19 | +13.06% |
| CPB | $32.33 | +1.28% | 9.6B | 21.55 | $1.50 | +4.76% |
| CAG | $18.51 | +1.37% | 8.8B | 7.71 | $2.40 | +7.55% |
Stock Comparison
KLG vs KHC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while KHC trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check KHC's competition here
KLG vs GIS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while GIS trades at $48.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check GIS's competition here
KLG vs MKC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while MKC trades at $70.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check MKC's competition here
KLG vs MKC-V Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while MKC-V trades at $70.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check MKC-V's competition here
KLG vs HRL Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while HRL trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check HRL's competition here
KLG vs SJM Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SJM trades at $108.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SJM's competition here
KLG vs PPC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while PPC trades at $47.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check PPC's competition here
KLG vs CPB Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while CPB trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check CPB's competition here
KLG vs CAG Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while CAG trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check CAG's competition here
KLG vs INGR Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while INGR trades at $126.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check INGR's competition here
KLG vs LW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while LW trades at $55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check LW's competition here
KLG vs BRBR Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRBR trades at $54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRBR's competition here
KLG vs POST Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while POST trades at $105.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check POST's competition here
KLG vs BRFS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRFS trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRFS's competition here
KLG vs DAR Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while DAR trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 48.46. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check DAR's competition here
KLG vs LANC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check LANC's competition here
KLG vs TWNK Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check TWNK's competition here
KLG vs TWNKW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check TWNKW's competition here
KLG vs FLO Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FLO trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FLO's competition here
KLG vs FRPT Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FRPT trades at $65.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 219.43. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FRPT's competition here
KLG vs SMPL Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SMPL trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SMPL's competition here
KLG vs NOMD Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while NOMD trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check NOMD's competition here
KLG vs SOVO Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SOVO's competition here
KLG vs CENT Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while CENT trades at $38.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check CENT's competition here
KLG vs CENTA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while CENTA trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check CENTA's competition here
KLG vs JJSF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while JJSF trades at $114.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check JJSF's competition here
KLG vs UTZ Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while UTZ trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 65.02. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check UTZ's competition here
KLG vs THS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 984.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while THS trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 54.14. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check THS's competition here
KLG vs HLF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 931.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while HLF trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check HLF's competition here
KLG vs JBSS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 745.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while JBSS trades at $63.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check JBSS's competition here
KLG vs SENEB Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 724.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SENEB trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SENEB's competition here
KLG vs SENEA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 714.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SENEA trades at $103.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SENEA's competition here
KLG vs STKL Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 670M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while STKL trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check STKL's competition here
KLG vs WEST Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 619M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while WEST trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check WEST's competition here
KLG vs THRN Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check THRN's competition here
KLG vs USNA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 537.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while USNA trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check USNA's competition here
KLG vs LWAY Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while LWAY trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check LWAY's competition here
KLG vs BRCC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 348M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRCC trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -18.22. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRCC's competition here
KLG vs BGS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 329.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BGS trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BGS's competition here
KLG vs MAMA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 304.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while MAMA trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 73.55. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check MAMA's competition here
KLG vs NATR Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while NATR trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check NATR's competition here
KLG vs BYND Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 219.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BYND trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BYND's competition here
KLG vs FREE Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FREE's competition here
KLG vs WESTW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check WESTW's competition here
KLG vs LFVN Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while LFVN trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check LFVN's competition here
KLG vs HAIN Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while HAIN trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check HAIN's competition here
KLG vs MMMB Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check MMMB's competition here
KLG vs FTLF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FTLF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FTLF's competition here
KLG vs PLIN Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check PLIN's competition here
KLG vs DDC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while DDC trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check DDC's competition here
KLG vs ABVE Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while ABVE trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check ABVE's competition here
KLG vs ABVEW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while ABVEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check ABVEW's competition here
KLG vs LSF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while LSF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -78.64. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check LSF's competition here
KLG vs BRID Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRID trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRID's competition here
KLG vs ATPC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while ATPC trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check ATPC's competition here
KLG vs BRLS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRLS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRLS's competition here
KLG vs PAVS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while PAVS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check PAVS's competition here
KLG vs WYHG Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while WYHG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check WYHG's competition here
KLG vs MITC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check MITC's competition here
KLG vs FARM Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FARM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FARM's competition here
KLG vs CLXT Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check CLXT's competition here
KLG vs HAPP Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check HAPP's competition here
KLG vs BOF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BOF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BOF's competition here
KLG vs JVA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while JVA trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check JVA's competition here
KLG vs YGF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check YGF's competition here
KLG vs NCRA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while NCRA trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check NCRA's competition here
KLG vs NAII Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while NAII trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check NAII's competition here
KLG vs BTOG Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BTOG trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BTOG's competition here
KLG vs COOT Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while COOT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check COOT's competition here
KLG vs TTCF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check TTCF's competition here
KLG vs PLAG Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while PLAG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check PLAG's competition here
KLG vs PETZ Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while PETZ trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check PETZ's competition here
KLG vs SOWG Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SOWG trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SOWG's competition here
KLG vs BON Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BON trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BON's competition here
KLG vs IMG Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while IMG trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check IMG's competition here
KLG vs NUZE Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check NUZE's competition here
KLG vs BTTR Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BTTR's competition here
KLG vs HCWC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while HCWC trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check HCWC's competition here
KLG vs FREEW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FREEW's competition here
KLG vs CYAN Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while CYAN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check CYAN's competition here
KLG vs ORIS Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while ORIS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check ORIS's competition here
KLG vs RGF Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check RGF's competition here
KLG vs FAMI Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while FAMI trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check FAMI's competition here
KLG vs BRLSW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRLSW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRLSW's competition here
KLG vs STKH Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 736.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while STKH trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check STKH's competition here
KLG vs BSFC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BSFC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BSFC's competition here
KLG vs SNAX Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 605K. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SNAX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SNAX's competition here
KLG vs SMFL Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SMFL's competition here
KLG vs SNAXW Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SNAXW's competition here
KLG vs RIBT Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check RIBT's competition here
KLG vs BRCN Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check BRCN's competition here
KLG vs SAFM Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check SAFM's competition here
KLG vs VGFC Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check VGFC's competition here
KLG vs DTEA Comparison August 2025
KLG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLG stands at 2B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLG is priced at $23.08, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLG currently has a P/E ratio of 35.49, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, KLG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLG is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLG.Check DTEA's competition here