Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. IVP Peers
See (IVP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVP | $1.62 | +0.62% | 3.69M | N/A | -$6,525.00 | N/A |
| ROL | $56.35 | +2.53% | 27.31B | 56.92 | $0.99 | +1.15% |
| SCI | $76.95 | +2.19% | 10.95B | 21.26 | $3.62 | +1.59% |
| HRB | $56.72 | +0.67% | 7.59B | 14.07 | $4.03 | +2.55% |
| BFAM | $122.38 | +2.03% | 7.01B | 44.18 | $2.77 | N/A |
| FTDR | $55.05 | +1.81% | 4.05B | 17.93 | $3.07 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.72B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.69 | +0.39% | 2.50B | 32.04 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2.00B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CSV | $43.35 | +4.26% | 680.29M | 14.50 | $2.99 | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
IVP vs ROL Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 27.31B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while ROL trades at $56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs SCI Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.95B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while SCI trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs HRB Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while HRB trades at $56.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs BFAM Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 7.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while BFAM trades at $122.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs FTDR Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while FTDR trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs DSEY Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs MCW Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while MCW trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs ROVR Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to ROVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs CSV Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 680.29M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while CSV trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs MED Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 147.17M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while MED trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -20.92. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs EM Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 117.48M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while EM trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -108.50. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs YYGH Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 58.14M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while YYGH trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs XSPA Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.52M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs RGS Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 53.03M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while RGS trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to RGS's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs WW Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 20.04M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while WW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to WW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs EJH Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 16.72M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while EJH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs TRNR Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while TRNR trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -13.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs MRM Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 6.32M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while MRM trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.
IVP vs XWEL Comparison
IVP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP stands at 3.69M. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, IVP is priced at $1.62, while XWEL trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, IVP's ROE is -32.65%, compared to XWEL's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.