Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.
Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. (HCWC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HCWC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCWC | $0.45 | +5.36% | 5.6M | -1.03 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| KHC | $28.25 | -1.50% | 33.4B | 12.90 | $2.19 | +5.58% |
| GIS | $49.85 | -2.39% | 27B | 12.16 | $4.10 | +4.72% |
| MKC | $71.61 | +0.06% | 19.2B | 24.95 | $2.87 | +2.47% |
| MKC-V | $72.54 | +1.31% | 19.2B | 24.90 | $2.87 | +2.47% |
| HRL | $28.55 | -2.36% | 15.7B | 21.00 | $1.36 | +3.94% |
| SJM | $108.70 | -0.29% | 11.6B | -9.40 | -$11.57 | +3.97% |
| PPC | $47.65 | -0.42% | 11.3B | 9.38 | $5.08 | +13.23% |
| CPB | $32.24 | -1.29% | 9.6B | 21.49 | $1.50 | +4.72% |
| CAG | $19.20 | -0.05% | 9.2B | 8.00 | $2.40 | +7.27% |
Stock Comparison
HCWC vs KHC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while KHC trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check KHC's competition here
HCWC vs GIS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while GIS trades at $49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check GIS's competition here
HCWC vs MKC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while MKC trades at $71.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check MKC's competition here
HCWC vs MKC-V Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while MKC-V trades at $72.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check MKC-V's competition here
HCWC vs HRL Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while HRL trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check HRL's competition here
HCWC vs SJM Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SJM trades at $108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SJM's competition here
HCWC vs PPC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while PPC trades at $47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check PPC's competition here
HCWC vs CPB Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while CPB trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check CPB's competition here
HCWC vs CAG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while CAG trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check CAG's competition here
HCWC vs INGR Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while INGR trades at $131.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check INGR's competition here
HCWC vs LW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while LW trades at $59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check LW's competition here
HCWC vs BRBR Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRBR trades at $55.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRBR's competition here
HCWC vs BRFS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRFS trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRFS's competition here
HCWC vs POST Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while POST trades at $106.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check POST's competition here
HCWC vs DAR Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while DAR trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 52.88. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check DAR's competition here
HCWC vs LANC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check LANC's competition here
HCWC vs TWNK Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check TWNK's competition here
HCWC vs TWNKW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check TWNKW's competition here
HCWC vs FLO Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FLO trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FLO's competition here
HCWC vs FRPT Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FRPT trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FRPT's competition here
HCWC vs SMPL Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SMPL trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SMPL's competition here
HCWC vs NOMD Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while NOMD trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check NOMD's competition here
HCWC vs SOVO Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SOVO's competition here
HCWC vs CENTA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while CENTA trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check CENTA's competition here
HCWC vs CENT Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while CENT trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check CENT's competition here
HCWC vs JJSF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while JJSF trades at $115.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check JJSF's competition here
HCWC vs KLG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while KLG trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 35.57. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check KLG's competition here
HCWC vs UTZ Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while UTZ trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check UTZ's competition here
HCWC vs THS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while THS trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 208.95. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check THS's competition here
HCWC vs HLF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 993M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while HLF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check HLF's competition here
HCWC vs JBSS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 783.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while JBSS trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check JBSS's competition here
HCWC vs STKL Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 752.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while STKL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -71.11. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check STKL's competition here
HCWC vs SENEB Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 711.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SENEB trades at $103.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SENEB's competition here
HCWC vs SENEA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 705.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SENEA trades at $102.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SENEA's competition here
HCWC vs WEST Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 677.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while WEST trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check WEST's competition here
HCWC vs USNA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 585.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while USNA trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check USNA's competition here
HCWC vs THRN Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check THRN's competition here
HCWC vs BRCC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRCC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRCC's competition here
HCWC vs LWAY Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while LWAY trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check LWAY's competition here
HCWC vs BGS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 342.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BGS trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BGS's competition here
HCWC vs MAMA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while MAMA trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 80.36. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check MAMA's competition here
HCWC vs NATR Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 272M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while NATR trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check NATR's competition here
HCWC vs BYND Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BYND trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BYND's competition here
HCWC vs FREE Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FREE's competition here
HCWC vs WESTW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check WESTW's competition here
HCWC vs LFVN Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while LFVN trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check LFVN's competition here
HCWC vs HAIN Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while HAIN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check HAIN's competition here
HCWC vs MMMB Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check MMMB's competition here
HCWC vs DDC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while DDC trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check DDC's competition here
HCWC vs FTLF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FTLF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FTLF's competition here
HCWC vs PLIN Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check PLIN's competition here
HCWC vs ABVEW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while ABVEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check ABVEW's competition here
HCWC vs ABVE Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while ABVE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check ABVE's competition here
HCWC vs LSF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while LSF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -79.61. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check LSF's competition here
HCWC vs BRID Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRID trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRID's competition here
HCWC vs ATPC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while ATPC trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check ATPC's competition here
HCWC vs BRLS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRLS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRLS's competition here
HCWC vs WYHG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while WYHG trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check WYHG's competition here
HCWC vs MITC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check MITC's competition here
HCWC vs PAVS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while PAVS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check PAVS's competition here
HCWC vs FARM Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FARM trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FARM's competition here
HCWC vs CLXT Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check CLXT's competition here
HCWC vs HAPP Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check HAPP's competition here
HCWC vs BTOG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BTOG trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BTOG's competition here
HCWC vs JVA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while JVA trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check JVA's competition here
HCWC vs BOF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BOF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BOF's competition here
HCWC vs YGF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check YGF's competition here
HCWC vs NCRA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while NCRA trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check NCRA's competition here
HCWC vs NAII Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while NAII trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check NAII's competition here
HCWC vs PLAG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while PLAG trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check PLAG's competition here
HCWC vs COOT Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while COOT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check COOT's competition here
HCWC vs SOWG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SOWG trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SOWG's competition here
HCWC vs TTCF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check TTCF's competition here
HCWC vs PETZ Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while PETZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check PETZ's competition here
HCWC vs BON Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BON trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BON's competition here
HCWC vs IMG Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while IMG trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check IMG's competition here
HCWC vs NUZE Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check NUZE's competition here
HCWC vs BTTR Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BTTR's competition here
HCWC vs ORIS Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while ORIS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check ORIS's competition here
HCWC vs FREEW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FREEW's competition here
HCWC vs CYAN Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while CYAN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check CYAN's competition here
HCWC vs FAMI Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while FAMI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check FAMI's competition here
HCWC vs BRLSW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRLSW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRLSW's competition here
HCWC vs RGF Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check RGF's competition here
HCWC vs STKH Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while STKH trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check STKH's competition here
HCWC vs BSFC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 772.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BSFC's competition here
HCWC vs SNAX Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 660K. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SNAX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SNAX's competition here
HCWC vs SMFL Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 171.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SMFL's competition here
HCWC vs SNAXW Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SNAXW's competition here
HCWC vs RIBT Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check RIBT's competition here
HCWC vs VGFC Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check VGFC's competition here
HCWC vs BRCN Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check BRCN's competition here
HCWC vs SAFM Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check SAFM's competition here
HCWC vs DTEA Comparison July 2025
HCWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCWC stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCWC is priced at $0.45, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCWC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, HCWC's ROE is -1.10%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCWC is more volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCWC.Check DTEA's competition here