Happiness Development Group Limited
Happiness Development Group Limited HAPP Peers
See (HAPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPP | $4.50 | +1.12% | 31.30M | -0.18 | -$25.56 | N/A |
| KHC | $26.50 | -0.49% | 31.36B | 12.10 | $2.19 | +6.03% |
| GIS | $53.34 | -0.04% | 29.21B | 11.72 | $4.55 | +4.49% |
| MKC-V | $71.33 | -1.61% | 19.14B | 24.60 | $2.90 | +2.44% |
| MKC | $71.31 | -1.70% | 19.12B | 24.59 | $2.90 | +2.44% |
| HRL | $29.46 | +0.12% | 16.20B | 21.34 | $1.38 | +3.88% |
| SJM | $111.99 | -0.48% | 11.92B | -46.66 | -$2.40 | +3.86% |
| PPC | $49.20 | -3.36% | 11.67B | 9.69 | $5.08 | +12.87% |
| CAG | $22.30 | -0.80% | 10.65B | 32.79 | $0.68 | +6.27% |
| CPB | $34.09 | -0.41% | 10.17B | 19.71 | $1.73 | +4.44% |
Stock Comparison
HAPP vs KHC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 31.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while KHC trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs GIS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 29.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while GIS trades at $53.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs MKC-V Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while MKC-V trades at $71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs MKC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while MKC trades at $71.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs HRL Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while HRL trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SJM Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.92B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SJM trades at $111.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -46.66. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs PPC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while PPC trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs CAG Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while CAG trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs CPB Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while CPB trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs INGR Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while INGR trades at $137.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BRBR Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BRBR trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs LW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while LW trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BRFS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BRFS trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs POST Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while POST trades at $107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs DAR Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while DAR trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs LANC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while LANC trades at $162.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs TWNK Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs TWNKW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs FRPT Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while FRPT trades at $84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 282.97. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs FLO Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while FLO trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SMPL Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SMPL trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs NOMD Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while NOMD trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SOVO Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs JJSF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while JJSF trades at $112.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs CENTA Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while CENTA trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs CENT Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while CENT trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs KLG Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while KLG trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs THS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while THS trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 224.60. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs UTZ Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while UTZ trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs JBSS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 709.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while JBSS trades at $60.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs HLF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 707.84M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while HLF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs WEST Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 694.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while WEST trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs STKL Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 684.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while STKL trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -64.67. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SENEA Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 622.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SENEA trades at $90.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SENEB Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 614.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SENEB trades at $90.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs USNA Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 558.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while USNA trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs THRN Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs LWAY Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 339.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while LWAY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BGS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 323.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BGS trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs NATR Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 264.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while NATR trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs MAMA Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 262.04M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while MAMA trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 77.44. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BYND Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 224.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BYND trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs FREE Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs HAIN Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 173.29M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while HAIN trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs WESTW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs LFVN Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 166.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while LFVN trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BRCC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 151.10M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BRCC trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs MMMB Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs PLIN Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs ATPC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 111.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while ATPC trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BRLS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 105.84M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BRLS trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs LSF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 74.20M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while LSF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BRID Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 70.80M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BRID trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs PAVS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 70.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while PAVS trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs WYHG Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 59.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while WYHG trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs MITC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs ABVE Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 42.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while ABVE trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs FARM Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 31.69M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while FARM trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs CLXT Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.33M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs YGF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs NAII Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 20.64M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while NAII trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs JVA Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 19.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while JVA trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs ORIS Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 19.00M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while ORIS trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs COOT Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 17.08M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while COOT trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BOF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 16.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs DDC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while DDC trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs NCRA Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 13.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while NCRA trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs TTCF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.22M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs PLAG Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 10.71M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while PLAG trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs PETZ Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while PETZ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs HCWC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 6.97M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while HCWC trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs NUZE Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -16.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs IMG Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 5.54M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while IMG trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BTTR Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BON Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 4.53M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BON trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs FREEW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs CYAN Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while CYAN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs ABVEW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while ABVEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BRLSW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BRLSW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs STKH Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 2.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while STKH trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs RGF Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs FAMI Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.14M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while FAMI trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SNAX Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SNAX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BTOG Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BTOG trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs BSFC Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 941056.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while BSFC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SNAXW Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 28379.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs RIBT Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1000.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.
HAPP vs SMFL Comparison
HAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAPP stands at 31.30M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 23.00. Regarding current trading prices, HAPP is priced at $4.50, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.18, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAPP's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HAPP is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAPP.