General Mills, Inc.
General Mills, Inc. GIS Peers
See (GIS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIS | $51.81 | +2.55% | 28.4B | 12.63 | $4.10 | +4.64% |
| KHC | $25.82 | +0.82% | 30.6B | 11.79 | $2.19 | +6.21% |
| MKC | $75.82 | -0.64% | 20.3B | 26.41 | $2.87 | +2.30% |
| MKC-V | $75.51 | -1.67% | 20.1B | 26.31 | $2.87 | +2.30% |
| HRL | $30.25 | -0.72% | 16.6B | 22.24 | $1.36 | +3.79% |
| PPC | $44.98 | +0.94% | 10.7B | 8.85 | $5.08 | +14.02% |
| SJM | $98.20 | +2.69% | 10.5B | -8.49 | -$11.57 | +4.40% |
| CAG | $20.47 | +0.34% | 9.8B | 30.08 | $0.68 | +6.84% |
| CPB | $30.65 | -0.45% | 9.1B | 20.43 | $1.50 | +4.96% |
| INGR | $135.62 | -0.18% | 8.7B | 14.30 | $9.48 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
GIS vs KHC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while KHC trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs MKC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while MKC trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs MKC-V Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while MKC-V trades at $75.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs HRL Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while HRL trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs PPC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while PPC trades at $44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SJM Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SJM trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs CAG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while CAG trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs CPB Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while CPB trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs INGR Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while INGR trades at $135.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRBR Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRBR trades at $57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs LW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while LW trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs POST Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while POST trades at $109.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs DAR Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while DAR trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRFS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRFS trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs LANC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs TWNK Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs TWNKW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FLO Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FLO trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FRPT Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FRPT trades at $67.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 226.53. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SMPL Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SMPL trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs NOMD Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while NOMD trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SOVO Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs JJSF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while JJSF trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs CENTA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while CENTA trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs CENT Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while CENT trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs KLG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while KLG trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs UTZ Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while UTZ trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs THS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 981.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while THS trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 194.30. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs HLF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 877.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while HLF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs JBSS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 743.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while JBSS trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SENEA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 702.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SENEA trades at $101.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SENEB Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SENEB trades at $101.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs STKL Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 681.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while STKL trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -64.44. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs USNA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 568.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while USNA trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs THRN Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs WEST Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 542.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while WEST trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs LWAY Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while LWAY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BGS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 337.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BGS trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs MAMA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while MAMA trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRCC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRCC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs NATR Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while NATR trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BYND Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BYND trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FREE Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs WESTW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs LFVN Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while LFVN trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs HAIN Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while HAIN trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs MMMB Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FTLF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FTLF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs PLIN Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRLS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRLS trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs ABVEW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs WYHG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while WYHG trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRID Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRID trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs LSF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while LSF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -70.44. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs ATPC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while ATPC trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs MITC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs ABVE Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while ABVE trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs PAVS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while PAVS trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs DDC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while DDC trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs CLXT Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs HAPP Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FARM Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FARM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs JVA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while JVA trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs YGF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BOF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BOF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs COOT Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while COOT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs NAII Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while NAII trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs NCRA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while NCRA trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs TTCF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs STKH Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while STKH trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs ORIS Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while ORIS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs IMG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while IMG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs PETZ Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while PETZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SOWG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SOWG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BON Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BON trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs HCWC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while HCWC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs NUZE Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs PLAG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while PLAG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BTTR Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FREEW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs CYAN Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while CYAN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs FAMI Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while FAMI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs RGF Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRLSW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRLSW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BTOG Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BTOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SNAX Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 958.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SNAX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BSFC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 816.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SMFL Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 70.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SMFL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SNAXW Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs RIBT Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs BRCN Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs DTEA Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs SAFM Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.
GIS vs VGFC Comparison
GIS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIS stands at 28.4B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GIS is priced at $51.81, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.63, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GIS is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIS.