Farfetch Limited
Farfetch Limited FTCH Peers
See (FTCH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCH | $0.64 | -13.26% | 254.21M | -0.28 | -$2.29 | N/A |
| AMZN | $211.37 | +1.31% | 2.24T | 34.48 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $131.62 | -0.70% | 318.97B | 15.06 | $8.74 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,515.12 | +0.42% | 127.51B | 66.57 | $37.78 | N/A |
| SE | $154.43 | +8.41% | 91.43B | 208.69 | $0.74 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,320.80 | -1.40% | 75.27B | 32.38 | $40.79 | N/A |
| CVNA | $292.92 | +4.76% | 62.73B | 185.39 | $1.58 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,645.21 | -0.52% | 60.98B | 24.45 | $149.07 | N/A |
| JD | $37.25 | +3.33% | 53.94B | 10.09 | $3.69 | +2.60% |
| CPNG | $26.55 | +1.57% | 48.20B | 189.64 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FTCH vs AMZN Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.24T. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AMZN trades at $211.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BABA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 318.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BABA trades at $131.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MELI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 127.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MELI trades at $2,515.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 66.57. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 91.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SE trades at $154.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 208.69. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ORLY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ORLY trades at $1,320.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CVNA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 62.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CVNA trades at $292.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 185.39. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs AZO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 60.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AZO trades at $3,645.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs JD Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 53.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while JD trades at $37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CPNG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 48.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CPNG trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 189.64. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs PDD Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 42.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while PDD trades at $119.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs VIPS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while VIPS trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EBAY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 31.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EBAY trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TSCO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TSCO trades at $52.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs FIVE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 22.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while FIVE trades at $101.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WSM Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WSM trades at $174.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ULTA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ULTA trades at $412.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs DKS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while DKS trades at $211.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GPC Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GPC trades at $121.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CHWY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 16.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CHWY trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 43.38. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CASY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CASY trades at $432.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBY trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GME Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GME trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 86.06. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CART Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CART trades at $44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MUSA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MUSA trades at $435.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GLBE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 7.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GLBE trades at $42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -94.20. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBWI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBWI trades at $33.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QVCGP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QVCGP trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs W Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while W trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas W's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ETSY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ETSY trades at $46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs RH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while RH trades at $225.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ASO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ASO trades at $46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OZON Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs AAP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AAP trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SVV Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SVV trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 70.29. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MNSO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MNSO trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EYE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EYE trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -57.15. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WINA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WINA trades at $412.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs RVLV Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while RVLV trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EVGOW Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EVGOW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EVGO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EVGO trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TANNI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SBH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 953.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SBH trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HEPS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 906.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HEPS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WOOF Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 890.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WOOF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs RERE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 885.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while RERE trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is -53.20. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OLPX Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 852.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OLPX trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LQDT Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 777.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LQDT trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OSTK Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TDUP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 744.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TDUP trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -21.72. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ARKO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 599.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ARKO trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HNST Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 565.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HNST trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -85.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ODP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 555.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ODP trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBW Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 552.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBW trades at $41.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HZO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 516.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HZO trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BNED Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 367.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BNED trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BWMX Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 356.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BWMX trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -47.80. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs FLWS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 333.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while FLWS trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -47.64. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CHPT Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 316.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CHPT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BYON Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 297.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BYON trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 289.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LE trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 46.90. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BARK Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 227.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BARK trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QRTEA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -9.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs JMIA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 210.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while JMIA trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BARK-WT Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 202.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BARK-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LOGC Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 202.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LOGC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BZUN Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 187.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BZUN trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WBUY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 159.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WBUY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -80.56. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs VLTA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs DADA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 131.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while DADA trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QRTEP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GOED Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OCG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 129.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OCG trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QVCGB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 111.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QVCGB trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs NEGG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 101.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while NEGG trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs APRN Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs AKA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 94.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AKA trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs DIBS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 93.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while DIBS trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SPWH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 80.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SPWH trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GRWG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 65.45M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GRWG trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs NHTC Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 57.57M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while NHTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs PRTS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 53.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while PRTS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HOUR Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 53.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HOUR trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 75.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QRTEB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QVCGA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 50.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QVCGA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CTIB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBBY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SSU Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BGFV Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 34.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BGFV trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs KIRK Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 27.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while KIRK trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TLF Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 24.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TLF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs YSG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 22.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while YSG trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CGTL Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 21.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CGTL trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs JBDI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while JBDI trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JBDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs IPW Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 18.55M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while IPW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ZOOZ Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 16.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ZOOZ trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BOXD Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ZKH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 12.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ZKH trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LITB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.21M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 11.74M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LITB trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LITB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.