Farfetch Limited
Farfetch Limited FTCH Peers
See (FTCH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCH | $0.64 | -13.26% | 254.2M | -0.28 | -$2.29 | N/A |
| AMZN | $219.92 | -0.24% | 2.3T | 35.76 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $110.71 | -2.86% | 264.2B | 12.21 | $9.07 | +1.73% |
| PDD | $103.97 | -1.44% | 144.4B | 11.15 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,472.05 | -1.17% | 125.3B | 60.68 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $149.42 | -0.72% | 88.5B | 104.48 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $89.32 | -1.30% | 76.3B | 32.83 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CVNA | $343.39 | +1.52% | 73.5B | 119.23 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,685.34 | -0.89% | 61.7B | 24.98 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.03 | +0.33% | 54.5B | 214.50 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FTCH vs AMZN Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AMZN trades at $219.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BABA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 264.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BABA trades at $110.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs PDD Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while PDD trades at $103.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MELI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MELI trades at $2,472.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SE trades at $149.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 104.48. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ORLY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ORLY trades at $89.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CVNA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CVNA trades at $343.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 119.23. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs AZO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AZO trades at $3,685.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CPNG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CPNG trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 214.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs JD Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while JD trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs VIPS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while VIPS trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EBAY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EBAY trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TSCO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TSCO trades at $55.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ULTA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ULTA trades at $474.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WSM Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WSM trades at $173.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CASY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CASY trades at $510.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GPC Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GPC trades at $127.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CHWY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CHWY trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs DKS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while DKS trades at $206.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBY trades at $71.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CART Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CART trades at $46.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GME Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GME trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MUSA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MUSA trades at $414.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs W Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while W trades at $56.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas W's P/E ratio is -19.88. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs FIVE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while FIVE trades at $131.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBWI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBWI trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GLBE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GLBE trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -88.65. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ETSY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ETSY trades at $52.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs RH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while RH trades at $205.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 48.89. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ASO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ASO trades at $47.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs AAP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AAP trades at $49.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OZON Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EYE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EYE trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -75.47. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SVV Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SVV trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 77.79. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs RVLV Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while RVLV trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MNSO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MNSO trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WINA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WINA trades at $374.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EVGOW Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs EVGO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while EVGO trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OLPX Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OLPX trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 79.75. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SBH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SBH trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TANNI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs YSG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 933.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while YSG trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TDUP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 893.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TDUP trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.05. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HEPS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 883.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HEPS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs WOOF Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 821.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while WOOF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs RERE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 780.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while RERE trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OSTK Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LQDT Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LQDT trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBW Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBW trades at $52.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ODP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 598.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ODP trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HZO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HZO trades at $27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HNST Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 567.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HNST trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -257.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ARKO Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ARKO trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 154.17. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ZKH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 503.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ZKH trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.71. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BYON Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BYON trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BNED Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BNED trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LE Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LE trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 88.54. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs FLWS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while FLWS trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs NEGG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while NEGG trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CHPT Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CHPT trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BWMX Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BWMX trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -43.05. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs JMIA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while JMIA trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QRTEA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LOGC Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LOGC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BARK Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BARK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BZUN Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BZUN trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs VLTA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QRTEP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GOED Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SPWH Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SPWH trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs DADA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs OCG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 121.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while OCG trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -32.61. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs AKA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while AKA trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs APRN Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs DIBS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while DIBS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QVCGP Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QVCGP trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs GRWG Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while GRWG trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BARK-WT Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BARK-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs HOUR Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while HOUR trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 156.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs NHTC Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while NHTC trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 114.50. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QRTEB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CTIB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs PRTS Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while PRTS trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BBBY Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs SSU Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BGFV Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BGFV trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs TLF Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while TLF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs KIRK Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while KIRK trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs CGTL Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while CGTL trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QVCGA Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QVCGA trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs QVCGB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs IPW Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while IPW trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs JBDI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while JBDI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs LGCB Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while LGCB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs BOXD Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs ZOOZ Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while ZOOZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.
FTCH vs MI Comparison
FTCH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTCH stands at 254.2M. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FTCH is priced at $0.64, while MI trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTCH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.28, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, FTCH's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTCH is more volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTCH.