Vipshop Holdings Limited
Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | $13.96 | -1.34% | 7B | 6.71 | $2.08 | +4.42% |
| AMZN | $264.14 | -1.15% | 2.8T | 31.63 | $8.35 | N/A |
| BABA | $132.59 | -6.04% | 307.9B | 35.17 | $3.77 | +1.51% |
| PDD | $95.83 | +0.26% | 136.4B | 9.87 | $9.71 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,546.81 | -3.77% | 78.4B | 40.75 | $37.96 | N/A |
| ORLY | $88.49 | -1.33% | 73.3B | 28.82 | $3.07 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,321.15 | -1.73% | 54.7B | 23.25 | $142.87 | N/A |
| SE | $88.23 | -0.11% | 54B | 34.72 | $2.54 | N/A |
| EBAY | $116.13 | +2.55% | 51.6B | 26.82 | $4.33 | +1.01% |
| JD | $32.01 | -2.59% | 43.9B | 23.54 | $1.36 | +3.13% |
Stock Comparison
VIPS vs AMZN Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while AMZN trades at $264.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AMZN's competition here
VIPS vs BABA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 307.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BABA trades at $132.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BABA's competition here
VIPS vs PDD Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while PDD trades at $95.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check PDD's competition here
VIPS vs MELI Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while MELI trades at $1,546.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MELI's competition here
VIPS vs ORLY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ORLY trades at $88.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ORLY's competition here
VIPS vs AZO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while AZO trades at $3,321.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AZO's competition here
VIPS vs SE Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while SE trades at $88.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SE's competition here
VIPS vs EBAY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while EBAY trades at $116.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EBAY's competition here
VIPS vs JD Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while JD trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JD's competition here
VIPS vs CASY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CASY trades at $852.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CASY's competition here
VIPS vs CPNG Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CPNG trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -161.15. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CPNG's competition here
VIPS vs ULTA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ULTA trades at $494.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ULTA's competition here
VIPS vs WSM Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while WSM trades at $168.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check WSM's competition here
VIPS vs DKS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while DKS trades at $216.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DKS's competition here
VIPS vs TSCO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TSCO trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TSCO's competition here
VIPS vs GPC Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while GPC trades at $92.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 211.05. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GPC's competition here
VIPS vs BBY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BBY trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBY's competition here
VIPS vs MUSA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while MUSA trades at $561.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MUSA's competition here
VIPS vs GME Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while GME trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GME's competition here
VIPS vs CART Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CART trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CART's competition here
VIPS vs CHWY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CHWY trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CHWY's competition here
VIPS vs W Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while W trades at $58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas W's P/E ratio is -24.77. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check W's competition here
VIPS vs ETSY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ETSY trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ETSY's competition here
VIPS vs GLBE Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while GLBE trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GLBE's competition here
VIPS vs MNSO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while MNSO trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MNSO's competition here
VIPS vs BBWI Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BBWI trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBWI's competition here
VIPS vs ASO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ASO trades at $50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ASO's competition here
VIPS vs AAP Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while AAP trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AAP's competition here
VIPS vs OZON Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check OZON's competition here
VIPS vs RH Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while RH trades at $123.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RH's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check RH's competition here
VIPS vs RERE Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while RERE trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check RERE's competition here
VIPS vs BOBS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BOBS trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BOBS's competition here
VIPS vs EYE Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while EYE trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EYE's competition here
VIPS vs OLPX Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while OLPX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is -101.50. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check OLPX's competition here
VIPS vs RVLV Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while RVLV trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check RVLV's competition here
VIPS vs TA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TA's competition here
VIPS vs SBH Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while SBH trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SBH's competition here
VIPS vs SVV Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while SVV trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 50.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SVV's competition here
VIPS vs LQDT Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while LQDT trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LQDT's competition here
VIPS vs TANNI Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TANNI's competition here
VIPS vs ODP Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ODP's competition here
VIPS vs HEPS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 822.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while HEPS trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HEPS's competition here
VIPS vs ARKO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ARKO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ARKO's competition here
VIPS vs OSTK Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check OSTK's competition here
VIPS vs HZO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 726.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while HZO trades at $33.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HZO's competition here
VIPS vs WOOF Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 710.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while WOOF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check WOOF's competition here
VIPS vs BWMX Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 598.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BWMX trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +5.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BWMX's competition here
VIPS vs EVGO Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 595.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while EVGO trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVGO's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EVGO's competition here
VIPS vs BYON Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BYON's competition here
VIPS vs TDUP Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TDUP trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -22.78. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TDUP's competition here
VIPS vs DADA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DADA's competition here
VIPS vs ZKH Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while ZKH trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -29.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ZKH's competition here
VIPS vs BBW Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 443.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BBW trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBW's competition here
VIPS vs JMIA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 433.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while JMIA trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JMIA's competition here
VIPS vs NEGG Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 423.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while NEGG trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -84.13. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NEGG's competition here
VIPS vs HNST Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 343.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while HNST trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -18.35. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HNST's competition here
VIPS vs LE Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 337.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while LE trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 60.94. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LE's competition here
VIPS vs BBBY Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 336.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BBBY trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBBY's competition here
VIPS vs BNED Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BNED trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -30.93. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BNED's competition here
VIPS vs FLWS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while FLWS trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check FLWS's competition here
VIPS vs FTCH Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check FTCH's competition here
VIPS vs LOGC Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while LOGC trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LOGC's competition here
VIPS vs YSG Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while YSG trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check YSG's competition here
VIPS vs QRTEA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QRTEA's competition here
VIPS vs CHPT Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CHPT trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CHPT's competition here
VIPS vs DIBS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while DIBS trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DIBS's competition here
VIPS vs VLTA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check VLTA's competition here
VIPS vs BZUN Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BZUN trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BZUN's competition here
VIPS vs JMG Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JMG's competition here
VIPS vs QRTEP Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QRTEP's competition here
VIPS vs GOED Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GOED's competition here
VIPS vs AKA Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while AKA trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AKA's competition here
VIPS vs APRN Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check APRN's competition here
VIPS vs GRWG Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while GRWG trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GRWG's competition here
VIPS vs BARK Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BARK trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BARK's competition here
VIPS vs HOUR Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while HOUR trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HOUR's competition here
VIPS vs PRTS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while PRTS trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check PRTS's competition here
VIPS vs SPWH Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while SPWH trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SPWH's competition here
VIPS vs QRTEB Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QRTEB's competition here
VIPS vs CTIB Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CTIB's competition here
VIPS vs KIRK Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check KIRK's competition here
VIPS vs SSU Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SSU's competition here
VIPS vs BGFV Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BGFV's competition here
VIPS vs NPT Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while NPT trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NPT's competition here
VIPS vs NHTC Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while NHTC trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -28.20. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NHTC's competition here
VIPS vs DTC Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DTC's competition here
VIPS vs LITB Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while LITB trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LITB's competition here
VIPS vs TBHC Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TBHC's competition here
VIPS vs QVCGP Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QVCGP's competition here
VIPS vs TLF Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TLF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TLF's competition here
VIPS vs MOGU Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while MOGU trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MOGU's competition here
VIPS vs BOXD Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BOXD's competition here
VIPS vs CGTL Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while CGTL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CGTL's competition here
VIPS vs SBDS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, SBDS has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while SBDS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas SBDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBDS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to SBDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SBDS's competition here
VIPS vs JBDI Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while JBDI trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JBDI's competition here
VIPS vs TCS Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TCS's competition here
VIPS vs YJ Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while YJ trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check YJ's competition here
VIPS vs TKAT Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while TKAT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TKAT's competition here
VIPS vs JWEL Comparison May 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 7B. In comparison, JWEL has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $13.96, while JWEL trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.71, whereas JWEL's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JWEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JWEL's competition here