Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | $12.92 | -3.58% | 6.4B | 5.21 | $2.48 | +4.75% |
| AMZN | $227.01 | -3.10% | 2.4T | 27.15 | $8.36 | N/A |
| BABA | $95.07 | -4.74% | 228.2B | 25.23 | $3.77 | +1.10% |
| PDD | $73.30 | -3.22% | 104.3B | 7.37 | $9.95 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,619.25 | -2.43% | 82.1B | 42.74 | $37.89 | N/A |
| ORLY | $86.90 | -1.05% | 72B | 28.40 | $3.06 | N/A |
| SE | $89.01 | -4.03% | 54.5B | 28.42 | $3.13 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,059.04 | -0.93% | 50B | 21.05 | $145.45 | N/A |
| EBAY | $108.00 | -1.32% | 48B | 18.62 | $5.80 | +1.11% |
| JD | $25.19 | -1.14% | 34B | 12.41 | $2.03 | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
VIPS vs AMZN Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while AMZN trades at $227.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AMZN's competition here
VIPS vs BABA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 228.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BABA trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BABA's competition here
VIPS vs PDD Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while PDD trades at $73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check PDD's competition here
VIPS vs MELI Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while MELI trades at $1,619.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MELI's competition here
VIPS vs ORLY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ORLY trades at $86.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ORLY's competition here
VIPS vs SE Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while SE trades at $89.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SE's competition here
VIPS vs AZO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while AZO trades at $3,059.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AZO's competition here
VIPS vs EBAY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while EBAY trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EBAY's competition here
VIPS vs JD Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while JD trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JD's competition here
VIPS vs CPNG Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CPNG trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -189.67. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CPNG's competition here
VIPS vs CASY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CASY trades at $784.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CASY's competition here
VIPS vs WSM Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while WSM trades at $240.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check WSM's competition here
VIPS vs ULTA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ULTA trades at $485.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ULTA's competition here
VIPS vs DKS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while DKS trades at $237.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DKS's competition here
VIPS vs BBY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BBY trades at $76.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBY's competition here
VIPS vs TSCO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TSCO trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TSCO's competition here
VIPS vs GPC Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while GPC trades at $112.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GPC's competition here
VIPS vs W Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while W trades at $93.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas W's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check W's competition here
VIPS vs CART Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CART trades at $46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CART's competition here
VIPS vs MUSA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while MUSA trades at $523.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MUSA's competition here
VIPS vs GME Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while GME trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GME's competition here
VIPS vs CHWY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CHWY trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CHWY's competition here
VIPS vs ETSY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ETSY trades at $77.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ETSY's competition here
VIPS vs GLBE Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while GLBE trades at $34.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 52.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GLBE's competition here
VIPS vs BBWI Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BBWI trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBWI's competition here
VIPS vs AAP Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while AAP trades at $59.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AAP's competition here
VIPS vs MNSO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while MNSO trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MNSO's competition here
VIPS vs RH Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while RH trades at $159.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check RH's competition here
VIPS vs ASO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ASO trades at $48.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ASO's competition here
VIPS vs OZON Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check OZON's competition here
VIPS vs BOBS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BOBS trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BOBS's competition here
VIPS vs RVLV Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while RVLV trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check RVLV's competition here
VIPS vs SVV Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while SVV trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SVV's competition here
VIPS vs EYE Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while EYE trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EYE's competition here
VIPS vs OLPX Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while OLPX trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check OLPX's competition here
VIPS vs RERE Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while RERE trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check RERE's competition here
VIPS vs SBH Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while SBH trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SBH's competition here
VIPS vs TA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TA's competition here
VIPS vs LQDT Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while LQDT trades at $38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LQDT's competition here
VIPS vs TANNI Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TANNI's competition here
VIPS vs HEPS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 920M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while HEPS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HEPS's competition here
VIPS vs TDUP Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 858.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TDUP trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -51.15. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TDUP's competition here
VIPS vs ODP Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ODP's competition here
VIPS vs ARKO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 833.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ARKO trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ARKO's competition here
VIPS vs HZO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 815M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while HZO trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 132.14. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HZO's competition here
VIPS vs OSTK Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check OSTK's competition here
VIPS vs WOOF Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 733.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while WOOF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check WOOF's competition here
VIPS vs BWMX Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 648.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BWMX trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BWMX's competition here
VIPS vs BYON Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BYON's competition here
VIPS vs EVGO Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 555.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while EVGO trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EVGO's competition here
VIPS vs DADA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DADA's competition here
VIPS vs BBBY Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 465.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BBBY trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBBY's competition here
VIPS vs BNED Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BNED trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BNED's competition here
VIPS vs ZKH Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while ZKH trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -65.63. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check ZKH's competition here
VIPS vs BBW Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 401.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BBW trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BBW's competition here
VIPS vs HNST Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 391.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while HNST trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 66.18. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HNST's competition here
VIPS vs JMIA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while JMIA trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JMIA's competition here
VIPS vs LE Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while LE trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LE's competition here
VIPS vs NEGG Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while NEGG trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -24.32. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NEGG's competition here
VIPS vs YSG Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 292.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while YSG trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check YSG's competition here
VIPS vs FTCH Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check FTCH's competition here
VIPS vs EVGOW Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 245.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while EVGOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check EVGOW's competition here
VIPS vs FLWS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while FLWS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check FLWS's competition here
VIPS vs QRTEA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QRTEA's competition here
VIPS vs DIBS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while DIBS trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DIBS's competition here
VIPS vs BZUN Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BZUN trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BZUN's competition here
VIPS vs VLTA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check VLTA's competition here
VIPS vs CHPT Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CHPT trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CHPT's competition here
VIPS vs JMG Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JMG's competition here
VIPS vs QRTEP Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QRTEP's competition here
VIPS vs GOED Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GOED's competition here
VIPS vs AKA Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while AKA trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check AKA's competition here
VIPS vs APRN Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check APRN's competition here
VIPS vs BARK Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BARK trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BARK's competition here
VIPS vs GRWG Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while GRWG trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check GRWG's competition here
VIPS vs HOUR Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while HOUR trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check HOUR's competition here
VIPS vs NXB Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while NXB trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NXB's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NXB's competition here
VIPS vs QRTEB Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QRTEB's competition here
VIPS vs NPT Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while NPT trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -57.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NPT's competition here
VIPS vs PRTS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while PRTS trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check PRTS's competition here
VIPS vs SPWH Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while SPWH trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SPWH's competition here
VIPS vs CTIB Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CTIB's competition here
VIPS vs KIRK Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check KIRK's competition here
VIPS vs SSU Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check SSU's competition here
VIPS vs BGFV Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BGFV's competition here
VIPS vs DTC Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check DTC's competition here
VIPS vs LITB Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while LITB trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check LITB's competition here
VIPS vs TBHC Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TBHC's competition here
VIPS vs QVCGP Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check QVCGP's competition here
VIPS vs TLF Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TLF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TLF's competition here
VIPS vs NHTC Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while NHTC trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check NHTC's competition here
VIPS vs BOXD Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check BOXD's competition here
VIPS vs MOGU Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while MOGU trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check MOGU's competition here
VIPS vs CGTL Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while CGTL trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check CGTL's competition here
VIPS vs TCS Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TCS's competition here
VIPS vs YJ Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while YJ trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check YJ's competition here
VIPS vs TKAT Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while TKAT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check TKAT's competition here
VIPS vs JWEL Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JWEL has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while JWEL trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas JWEL's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JWEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JWEL's competition here
VIPS vs JBDI Comparison June 2026
VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $12.92, while JBDI trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 5.21, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.Check JBDI's competition here