MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while AMZN trades at $245.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check AMZN's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 269.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BABA trades at $112.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BABA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while MELI trades at $1,852.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 48.88. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MELI's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ORLY trades at $86.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ORLY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while SE trades at $111.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SE's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while EBAY trades at $117.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EBAY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while AZO trades at $3,072.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check AZO's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while JD trades at $28.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JD's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while CPNG trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -208.89. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CPNG's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while CASY trades at $819.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 42.79. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CASY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while WSM trades at $221.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check WSM's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ULTA trades at $469.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ULTA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while DKS trades at $217.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DKS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while GPC trades at $125.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GPC's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BBY trades at $82.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TSCO trades at $30.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TSCO's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while W trades at $89.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas W's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check W's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while MUSA trades at $590.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MUSA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while GME trades at $21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GME's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while CHWY trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CHWY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ETSY trades at $81.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ETSY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while VIPS trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check VIPS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while GLBE trades at $38.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GLBE's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BBWI trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBWI's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ABG trades at $211.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ABG's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while AAP trades at $57.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check AAP's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while RH trades at $165.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check RH's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ASO trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ASO's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OZON's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BOBS trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BOBS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while RVLV trades at $23.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check RVLV's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while EYE trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EYE's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while SVV trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SVV's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while CRI trades at $40.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CRI's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while SBH trades at $15.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SBH's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while RERE trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check RERE's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OLPX's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while LQDT trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LQDT's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TANNI's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 942.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while HEPS trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HEPS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 905.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ARKO trades at $8.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ARKO's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 851.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TDUP trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -50.77. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TDUP's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ODP's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OSTK's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while HZO trades at $34.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 122.82. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HZO's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while WOOF trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check WOOF's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BWMX trades at $18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BWMX's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 573.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while EVGOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EVGOW's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 568.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while EVGO trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check EVGO's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BYON's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DADA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 452.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while ZKH trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -72.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check ZKH's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BNED trades at $12.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BNED's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 441.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while HNST trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 74.55. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HNST's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while JMIA trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JMIA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BBW trades at $34.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBW's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BBBY trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BBBY's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while LE trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LE's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 296.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while NEGG trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -20.79. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NEGG's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check FTCH's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 241.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while FLWS trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check FLWS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QRTEA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while DIBS trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DIBS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BZUN trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BZUN's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 154.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while CHPT trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CHPT's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check VLTA's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JMG's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QRTEP's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GOED's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check APRN's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while GRWG trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check GRWG's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BARK trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BARK's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while HOUR trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check HOUR's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check OTH's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while NPT trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NPT's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QRTEB's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while NXB trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NXB's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NXB's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check CTIB's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while SPWH trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SPWH's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while PRTS trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check PRTS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check KIRK's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check SSU's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BGFV's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check DTC's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while LITB trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check LITB's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while NHTC trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -17.48. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NHTC's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TBHC's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check QVCGP's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TLF trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TLF's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while MOGU trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check MOGU's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check BOXD's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TCS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TCS's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while YJ trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check YJ's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while TKAT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check TKAT's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PIK has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while PIK trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas PIK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIK's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to PIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check PIK's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JWEL has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while JWEL trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas JWEL's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JWEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is more volatile compared to JWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JWEL's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JOAN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while JOAN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas JOAN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JOAN's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to JOAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check JOAN's competition here

MNSO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MNSO stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NAAS has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MNSO is priced at $11.79, while NAAS trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MNSO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.46, whereas NAAS's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MNSO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAAS's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MNSO is less volatile compared to NAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MNSO.Check NAAS's competition here