Qurate Retail, Inc. (QRTEB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QRTEB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRTEB | $2.00 | -0.99% | 51.3M | -2.82 | -$0.71 | N/A |
| AMZN | $270.64 | -1.23% | 2.9T | 31.25 | $8.66 | N/A |
| BABA | $124.22 | -1.54% | 290B | 32.96 | $3.77 | +1.61% |
| PDD | $84.44 | +1.70% | 118.6B | 8.88 | $9.51 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,695.65 | +0.01% | 85.9B | 44.81 | $37.81 | N/A |
| ORLY | $86.88 | -2.63% | 72B | 28.21 | $3.08 | N/A |
| SE | $90.53 | -1.53% | 55.4B | 35.64 | $2.54 | N/A |
| EBAY | $109.27 | -2.55% | 48.5B | 25.24 | $4.33 | +1.11% |
| AZO | $2,935.19 | -2.39% | 48B | 20.55 | $142.84 | N/A |
| JD | $28.83 | -1.06% | 39.5B | 21.20 | $1.36 | +3.47% |
Stock Comparison
QRTEB vs AMZN Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AMZN trades at $270.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AMZN's competition here
QRTEB vs BABA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 290B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BABA trades at $124.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BABA's competition here
QRTEB vs PDD Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while PDD trades at $84.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check PDD's competition here
QRTEB vs MELI Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MELI trades at $1,695.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MELI's competition here
QRTEB vs ORLY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ORLY trades at $86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ORLY's competition here
QRTEB vs SE Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SE trades at $90.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SE's competition here
QRTEB vs EBAY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EBAY trades at $109.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EBAY's competition here
QRTEB vs AZO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AZO trades at $2,935.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AZO's competition here
QRTEB vs JD Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JD trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JD's competition here
QRTEB vs CPNG Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CPNG trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -166.20. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CPNG's competition here
QRTEB vs CASY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CASY trades at $767.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CASY's competition here
QRTEB vs WSM Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while WSM trades at $203.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check WSM's competition here
QRTEB vs ULTA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ULTA trades at $508.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ULTA's competition here
QRTEB vs DKS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DKS trades at $227.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DKS's competition here
QRTEB vs TSCO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TSCO trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TSCO's competition here
QRTEB vs BBY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBY trades at $77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBY's competition here
QRTEB vs GPC Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GPC trades at $98.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 219.22. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GPC's competition here
QRTEB vs W Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while W trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas W's P/E ratio is -30.76. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check W's competition here
QRTEB vs GME Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GME trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GME's competition here
QRTEB vs CART Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CART trades at $39.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CART's competition here
QRTEB vs MUSA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MUSA trades at $506.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MUSA's competition here
QRTEB vs CHWY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CHWY trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 43.38. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CHWY's competition here
QRTEB vs VIPS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while VIPS trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check VIPS's competition here
QRTEB vs ETSY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ETSY trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ETSY's competition here
QRTEB vs GLBE Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GLBE trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GLBE's competition here
QRTEB vs MNSO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MNSO trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MNSO's competition here
QRTEB vs BBWI Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBWI trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBWI's competition here
QRTEB vs AAP Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AAP trades at $60.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AAP's competition here
QRTEB vs ASO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ASO trades at $52.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ASO's competition here
QRTEB vs RH Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while RH trades at $148.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to RH's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check RH's competition here
QRTEB vs OZON Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OZON's competition here
QRTEB vs BOBS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BOBS trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BOBS's competition here
QRTEB vs RERE Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while RERE trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check RERE's competition here
QRTEB vs RVLV Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while RVLV trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check RVLV's competition here
QRTEB vs SVV Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SVV trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SVV's competition here
QRTEB vs OLPX Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OLPX trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OLPX's competition here
QRTEB vs EYE Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EYE trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EYE's competition here
QRTEB vs TA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TA's competition here
QRTEB vs SBH Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SBH trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SBH's competition here
QRTEB vs LQDT Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LQDT trades at $36.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LQDT's competition here
QRTEB vs TANNI Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TANNI's competition here
QRTEB vs WOOF Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 973.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while WOOF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 100.33. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check WOOF's competition here
QRTEB vs HEPS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 900.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HEPS trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HEPS's competition here
QRTEB vs ARKO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 870.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ARKO trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ARKO's competition here
QRTEB vs ODP Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ODP's competition here
QRTEB vs OSTK Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check OSTK's competition here
QRTEB vs HZO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 758.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HZO trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -12.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HZO's competition here
QRTEB vs EVGO Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while EVGO trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to EVGO's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check EVGO's competition here
QRTEB vs BWMX Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BWMX trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BWMX's competition here
QRTEB vs TDUP Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 600M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TDUP trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TDUP's competition here
QRTEB vs BYON Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BYON's competition here
QRTEB vs DADA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DADA's competition here
QRTEB vs BBW Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 468.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBW trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBW's competition here
QRTEB vs ZKH Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while ZKH trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check ZKH's competition here
QRTEB vs BBBY Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 453.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BBBY trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BBBY's competition here
QRTEB vs JMIA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 449.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JMIA trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JMIA's competition here
QRTEB vs HNST Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 385.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HNST trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -20.59. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HNST's competition here
QRTEB vs NEGG Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 381.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while NEGG trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -75.79. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check NEGG's competition here
QRTEB vs LE Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 361.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LE trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 65.28. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LE's competition here
QRTEB vs BNED Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BNED trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BNED's competition here
QRTEB vs YSG Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 296.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while YSG trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check YSG's competition here
QRTEB vs FLWS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 290.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while FLWS trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check FLWS's competition here
QRTEB vs FTCH Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check FTCH's competition here
QRTEB vs LOGC Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LOGC trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LOGC's competition here
QRTEB vs QRTEA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QRTEA's competition here
QRTEB vs CHPT Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CHPT trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CHPT's competition here
QRTEB vs DIBS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DIBS trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DIBS's competition here
QRTEB vs VLTA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check VLTA's competition here
QRTEB vs BZUN Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BZUN's competition here
QRTEB vs JMG Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JMG's competition here
QRTEB vs QRTEP Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QRTEP's competition here
QRTEB vs GOED Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GOED's competition here
QRTEB vs GRWG Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while GRWG trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check GRWG's competition here
QRTEB vs AKA Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while AKA trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check AKA's competition here
QRTEB vs APRN Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check APRN's competition here
QRTEB vs BARK Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BARK trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BARK's competition here
QRTEB vs HOUR Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while HOUR trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 38.20. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check HOUR's competition here
QRTEB vs SPWH Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SPWH trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SPWH's competition here
QRTEB vs CTIB Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CTIB's competition here
QRTEB vs PRTS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while PRTS trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check PRTS's competition here
QRTEB vs KIRK Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check KIRK's competition here
QRTEB vs SSU Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SSU's competition here
QRTEB vs BGFV Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BGFV's competition here
QRTEB vs DTC Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check DTC's competition here
QRTEB vs NHTC Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while NHTC trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check NHTC's competition here
QRTEB vs LITB Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LITB trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LITB's competition here
QRTEB vs NPT Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while NPT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check NPT's competition here
QRTEB vs TBHC Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TBHC's competition here
QRTEB vs QVCGP Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check QVCGP's competition here
QRTEB vs TLF Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TLF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TLF's competition here
QRTEB vs MOGU Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while MOGU trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check MOGU's competition here
QRTEB vs BOXD Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check BOXD's competition here
QRTEB vs CGTL Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while CGTL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check CGTL's competition here
QRTEB vs SBDS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, SBDS has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while SBDS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SBDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to SBDS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to SBDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check SBDS's competition here
QRTEB vs JBDI Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while JBDI trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check JBDI's competition here
QRTEB vs TCS Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TCS's competition here
QRTEB vs LGCB Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while LGCB trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check LGCB's competition here
QRTEB vs YJ Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while YJ trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check YJ's competition here
QRTEB vs TKAT Comparison June 2026
QRTEB plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRTEB stands at 51.3M. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRTEB is priced at $2.00, while TKAT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRTEB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, QRTEB's ROE is +0.96%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QRTEB is more volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRTEB.Check TKAT's competition here