1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FLWS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FLWS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLWS | $3.90 | +1.56% | 248.7M | -3.58 | -$1.09 | N/A |
| AMZN | $271.58 | +15.32% | 2.9T | 32.49 | $8.36 | N/A |
| BABA | $122.25 | +5.10% | 293.1B | 32.44 | $3.77 | +0.86% |
| PDD | $88.56 | +1.28% | 126.1B | 8.90 | $9.95 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,877.95 | -0.41% | 95.2B | 49.56 | $37.89 | N/A |
| ORLY | $89.35 | +2.28% | 74B | 29.20 | $3.06 | N/A |
| SE | $106.74 | +0.47% | 64B | 34.08 | $3.13 | N/A |
| EBAY | $114.01 | +0.43% | 50.6B | 19.66 | $5.80 | +1.05% |
| AZO | $3,016.25 | +0.32% | 49.3B | 20.75 | $145.45 | N/A |
| JD | $33.01 | +2.17% | 46.3B | 16.26 | $2.03 | +3.04% |
Stock Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN)
FLWS vs AMZN Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while AMZN trades at $271.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check AMZN's competition here
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA)
FLWS vs BABA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 293.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BABA trades at $122.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BABA's competition here
PDD Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: PDD)
FLWS vs PDD Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while PDD trades at $88.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check PDD's competition here
MercadoLibre, Inc. (NASDAQ: MELI)
FLWS vs MELI Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while MELI trades at $1,877.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check MELI's competition here
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ: ORLY)
FLWS vs ORLY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ORLY trades at $89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ORLY's competition here
Sea Limited (NYSE: SE)
FLWS vs SE Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while SE trades at $106.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check SE's competition here
eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY)
FLWS vs EBAY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while EBAY trades at $114.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check EBAY's competition here
AutoZone, Inc. (NYSE: AZO)
FLWS vs AZO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while AZO trades at $3,016.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check AZO's competition here
JD.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: JD)
FLWS vs JD Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while JD trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check JD's competition here
Casey's General Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASY)
FLWS vs CASY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while CASY trades at $871.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check CASY's competition here
Coupang, Inc. (NYSE: CPNG)
FLWS vs CPNG Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while CPNG trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -181.83. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check CPNG's competition here
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (NYSE: WSM)
FLWS vs WSM Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while WSM trades at $228.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check WSM's competition here
Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA)
FLWS vs ULTA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ULTA trades at $512.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ULTA's competition here
Best Buy Co., Inc. (NYSE: BBY)
FLWS vs BBY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BBY trades at $86.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BBY's competition here
Genuine Parts Company (NYSE: GPC)
FLWS vs GPC Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while GPC trades at $124.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check GPC's competition here
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (NYSE: DKS)
FLWS vs DKS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while DKS trades at $195.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check DKS's competition here
Tractor Supply Company (NASDAQ: TSCO)
FLWS vs TSCO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while TSCO trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check TSCO's competition here
Five Below, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVE)
FLWS vs FIVE Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while FIVE trades at $217.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check FIVE's competition here
Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA)
FLWS vs MUSA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while MUSA trades at $607.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check MUSA's competition here
Wayfair Inc. (NYSE: W)
FLWS vs W Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while W trades at $84.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas W's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to W. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check W's competition here
GameStop Corp. (NYSE: GME)
FLWS vs GME Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while GME trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check GME's competition here
Chewy, Inc. (NYSE: CHWY)
FLWS vs CHWY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while CHWY trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check CHWY's competition here
Etsy, Inc. (NYSE: ETSY)
FLWS vs ETSY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ETSY trades at $81.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ETSY's competition here
Vipshop Holdings Limited (NYSE: VIPS)
FLWS vs VIPS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while VIPS trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check VIPS's competition here
Global-e Online Ltd. (NASDAQ: GLBE)
FLWS vs GLBE Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while GLBE trades at $39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 60.48. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check GLBE's competition here
Bath & Body Works, Inc. (NYSE: BBWI)
FLWS vs BBWI Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BBWI trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BBWI's competition here
MINISO Group Holding Limited (NYSE: MNSO)
FLWS vs MNSO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while MNSO trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check MNSO's competition here
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (NYSE: AAP)
FLWS vs AAP Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while AAP trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check AAP's competition here
Warby Parker Inc. (NYSE: WRBY)
FLWS vs WRBY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while WRBY trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 98.93. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check WRBY's competition here
Rh (NYSE: RH)
FLWS vs RH Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while RH trades at $165.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check RH's competition here
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASO)
FLWS vs ASO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ASO trades at $47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ASO's competition here
Ozon Holdings PLC (NASDAQ: OZON)
FLWS vs OZON Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check OZON's competition here
Bob's Discount Furniture, Inc. (NYSE: BOBS)
FLWS vs BOBS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BOBS trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BOBS's competition here
Revolve Group, Inc. (NYSE: RVLV)
FLWS vs RVLV Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while RVLV trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check RVLV's competition here
National Vision Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EYE)
FLWS vs EYE Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while EYE trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check EYE's competition here
Savers Value Village, Inc. (NYSE: SVV)
FLWS vs SVV Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while SVV trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check SVV's competition here
ATRenew Inc. (NYSE: RERE)
FLWS vs RERE Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while RERE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check RERE's competition here
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SBH)
FLWS vs SBH Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while SBH trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check SBH's competition here
Carter's Inc. (NYSE: CRI)
FLWS vs CRI Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while CRI trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check CRI's competition here
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OLPX)
FLWS vs OLPX Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while OLPX trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check OLPX's competition here
TravelCenters of America Inc. (NASDAQ: TA)
FLWS vs TA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check TA's competition here
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT)
FLWS vs LQDT Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while LQDT trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check LQDT's competition here
Winmark Corporation (NASDAQ: WINA)
FLWS vs WINA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while WINA trades at $333.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check WINA's competition here
TravelCenters of America LLC SR NT 8.25%2028 (NASDAQ: TANNI)
FLWS vs TANNI Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check TANNI's competition here
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. (NASDAQ: HEPS)
FLWS vs HEPS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while HEPS trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check HEPS's competition here
Arko Corp. (NASDAQ: ARKO)
FLWS vs ARKO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 903.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ARKO trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ARKO's competition here
The ODP Corporation (NASDAQ: ODP)
FLWS vs ODP Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ODP's competition here
Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: WOOF)
FLWS vs WOOF Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 796.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while WOOF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check WOOF's competition here
Overstock.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSTK)
FLWS vs OSTK Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check OSTK's competition here
MarineMax, Inc. (NYSE: HZO)
FLWS vs HZO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 758.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while HZO trades at $34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 123.04. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check HZO's competition here
ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ: TDUP)
FLWS vs TDUP Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while TDUP trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -44.46. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check TDUP's competition here
Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (NYSE: BWMX)
FLWS vs BWMX Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 635.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BWMX trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BWMX's competition here
Beyond, Inc. (NYSE: BYON)
FLWS vs BYON Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BYON's competition here
Envela Corporation (AMEX: ELA)
FLWS vs ELA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ELA trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ELA's competition here
Dada Nexus Limited (NASDAQ: DADA)
FLWS vs DADA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check DADA's competition here
EVgo, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVGO)
FLWS vs EVGO Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 495.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while EVGO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check EVGO's competition here
ZKH Group Limited (NYSE: ZKH)
FLWS vs ZKH Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 474.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ZKH trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -75.71. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ZKH's competition here
Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (NYSE: BNED)
FLWS vs BNED Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BNED trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BNED's competition here
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (NYSE: BBW)
FLWS vs BBW Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BBW trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BBW's competition here
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (NYSE: BBBY)
FLWS vs BBBY Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 376.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BBBY trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BBBY's competition here
Jumia Technologies AG (NYSE: JMIA)
FLWS vs JMIA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while JMIA trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check JMIA's competition here
Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ: NEGG)
FLWS vs NEGG Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while NEGG trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check NEGG's competition here
Farfetch Limited (NYSE: FTCH)
FLWS vs FTCH Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check FTCH's competition here
Qurate Retail, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRTEA)
FLWS vs QRTEA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check QRTEA's competition here
OneWater Marine Inc. (NASDAQ: ONEW)
FLWS vs ONEW Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ONEW trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ONEW's competition here
High Tide Inc. (NASDAQ: HITI)
FLWS vs HITI Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while HITI trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to HITI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check HITI's competition here
Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN)
FLWS vs BZUN Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BZUN trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BZUN's competition here
Volta Inc. (NYSE: VLTA)
FLWS vs VLTA Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check VLTA's competition here
1stdibs.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: DIBS)
FLWS vs DIBS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while DIBS trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check DIBS's competition here
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CHPT)
FLWS vs CHPT Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while CHPT trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check CHPT's competition here
JM Group Limited (AMEX: JMG)
FLWS vs JMG Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check JMG's competition here
Qurate Retail, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRTEP)
FLWS vs QRTEP Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check QRTEP's competition here
Polished.com Inc. (AMEX: GOED)
FLWS vs GOED Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check GOED's competition here
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: APRN)
FLWS vs APRN Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check APRN's competition here
GrowGeneration Corp. (NASDAQ: GRWG)
FLWS vs GRWG Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while GRWG trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check GRWG's competition here
BARK, Inc. (NYSE: BARK)
FLWS vs BARK Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BARK trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BARK's competition here
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. WT (NYSE: PEW-WT)
FLWS vs PEW-WT Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while PEW-WT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check PEW-WT's competition here
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. (NYSE: PEW)
FLWS vs PEW Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while PEW trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to PEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check PEW's competition here
Texxon Holding Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NPT)
FLWS vs NPT Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while NPT trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -78.25. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to NPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check NPT's competition here
Hour Loop, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOUR)
FLWS vs HOUR Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while HOUR trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check HOUR's competition here
Off The Hook YS Inc. (AMEX: OTH)
FLWS vs OTH Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while OTH trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to OTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check OTH's competition here
Qurate Retail, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRTEB)
FLWS vs QRTEB Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check QRTEB's competition here
Yunhong CTI Ltd. (NASDAQ: CTIB)
FLWS vs CTIB Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check CTIB's competition here
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SPWH)
FLWS vs SPWH Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while SPWH trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check SPWH's competition here
CarParts.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRTS)
FLWS vs PRTS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while PRTS trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check PRTS's competition here
PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS)
FLWS vs PETS Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while PETS trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to PETS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to PETS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check PETS's competition here
Able View Inc. (NASDAQ: ABLV)
FLWS vs ABLV Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while ABLV trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check ABLV's competition here
Kirkland's, Inc. (NASDAQ: KIRK)
FLWS vs KIRK Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check KIRK's competition here
SIGNA Sports United N.V. (NYSE: SSU)
FLWS vs SSU Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check SSU's competition here
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (NASDAQ: BGFV)
FLWS vs BGFV Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BGFV's competition here
Solo Brands, Inc. (NYSE: DTC)
FLWS vs DTC Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check DTC's competition here
LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: LITB)
FLWS vs LITB Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while LITB trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check LITB's competition here
The Brand House Collective, Inc. (NASDAQ: TBHC)
FLWS vs TBHC Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check TBHC's competition here
QVC Group Inc. (NASDAQ: QVCGP)
FLWS vs QVCGP Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check QVCGP's competition here
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (NASDAQ: TLF)
FLWS vs TLF Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while TLF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check TLF's competition here
Natural Health Trends Corp. (NASDAQ: NHTC)
FLWS vs NHTC Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while NHTC trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check NHTC's competition here
MOGU Inc. (NYSE: MOGU)
FLWS vs MOGU Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while MOGU trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check MOGU's competition here
Boxed, Inc. (NYSE: BOXD)
FLWS vs BOXD Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check BOXD's competition here
Fort Technology Inc. Common Shares (NASDAQ: FRTT)
FLWS vs FRTT Comparison August 2026
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLWS stands at 248.7M. In comparison, FRTT has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, FLWS is priced at $3.90 on the NASDAQ, while FRTT trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLWS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.58, whereas FRTT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, FLWS's ROE is -0.56%, compared to FRTT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLWS is more volatile compared to FRTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLWS.Check FRTT's competition here