a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See AKA's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for AKA and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKA | $10.97 | -0.27% | 118.7M | -4.85 | -$2.26 | N/A |
| TJX | $154.22 | +0.48% | 170.3B | 30.84 | $5.00 | +1.13% |
| ROST | $238.89 | +2.80% | 76.6B | 33.36 | $7.16 | +0.71% |
| BURL | $349.97 | +3.09% | 22B | 34.00 | $10.29 | N/A |
| LULU | $114.28 | +3.30% | 13B | 9.22 | $12.39 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $19.01 | +0.69% | 6.8B | 9.42 | $2.02 | +3.56% |
| VSCO | $83.55 | +0.92% | 6.6B | 43.29 | $1.93 | N/A |
| URBN | $69.97 | +0.52% | 6B | 12.52 | $5.59 | N/A |
| BOOT | $149.98 | +1.50% | 4.6B | 20.41 | $7.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
The TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TJX)
AKA vs TJX Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while TJX trades at $154.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check TJX's competition here
Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROST)
AKA vs ROST Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while ROST trades at $238.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check ROST's competition here
Burlington Stores, Inc. (NYSE: BURL)
AKA vs BURL Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while BURL trades at $349.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BURL's competition here
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ: LULU)
AKA vs LULU Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while LULU trades at $114.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LULU's competition here
The Gap, Inc. (NYSE: GPS)
AKA vs GPS Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GPS's competition here
The Gap, Inc. (NYSE: GAP)
AKA vs GAP Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while GAP trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GAP's competition here
Victoria's Secret & Co. (NYSE: VSCO)
AKA vs VSCO Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while VSCO trades at $83.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 43.29. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check VSCO's competition here
Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ: URBN)
AKA vs URBN Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while URBN trades at $69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check URBN's competition here
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BOOT)
AKA vs BOOT Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while BOOT trades at $149.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BOOT's competition here
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (NYSE: ANF)
AKA vs ANF Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while ANF trades at $93.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check ANF's competition here
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (NYSE: AEO)
AKA vs AEO Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while AEO trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check AEO's competition here
Foot Locker, Inc. (NYSE: FL)
AKA vs FL Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check FL's competition here
The Buckle, Inc. (NYSE: BKE)
AKA vs BKE Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while BKE trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BKE's competition here
Hibbett, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIBB)
AKA vs HIBB Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check HIBB's competition here
Chico's FAS, Inc. (NYSE: CHS)
AKA vs CHS Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CHS's competition here
Guess', Inc. (NYSE: GES)
AKA vs GES Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GES's competition here
Citi Trends, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTRN)
AKA vs CTRN Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 524.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while CTRN trades at $62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 273.57. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CTRN's competition here
Stitch Fix, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFIX)
AKA vs SFIX Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while SFIX trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check SFIX's competition here
Genesco Inc. (NYSE: GCO)
AKA vs GCO Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while GCO trades at $35.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GCO's competition here
Shoe Carnival, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: SHOE)
AKA vs SHOE Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, SHOE has a market cap of 395.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while SHOE trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SHOE's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHOE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SHOE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check SHOE's competition here
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCVL)
AKA vs SCVL Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 394.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while SCVL trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check SCVL's competition here
Zumiez Inc. (NASDAQ: ZUMZ)
AKA vs ZUMZ Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while ZUMZ trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check ZUMZ's competition here
Torrid Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CURV)
AKA vs CURV Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while CURV trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CURV's competition here
J.Jill, Inc. (NYSE: JILL)
AKA vs JILL Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while JILL trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check JILL's competition here
Duluth Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTH)
AKA vs DLTH Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while DLTH trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -24.71. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DLTH's competition here
Tilly's, Inc. (NYSE: TLYS)
AKA vs TLYS Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while TLYS trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -34.27. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check TLYS's competition here
The Cato Corporation (NYSE: CATO)
AKA vs CATO Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while CATO trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -329.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CATO's competition here
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LVLU)
AKA vs LVLU Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while LVLU trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LVLU's competition here
The Children's Place, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLCE)
AKA vs PLCE Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while PLCE trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check PLCE's competition here
Destination XL Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: DXLG)
AKA vs DXLG Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while DXLG trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DXLG's competition here
Digital Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: DBGIW)
AKA vs DBGIW Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DBGIW's competition here
Rent the Runway, Inc. (NASDAQ: RENT)
AKA vs RENT Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while RENT trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check RENT's competition here
Express, Inc. (NYSE: EXPR)
AKA vs EXPR Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check EXPR's competition here
Digital Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: DBGI)
AKA vs DBGI Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while DBGI trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DBGI's competition here
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: JEM)
AKA vs JEM Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 582.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while JEM trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to JEM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check JEM's competition here
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSUN)
AKA vs PSUN Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, PSUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while PSUN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PSUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PSUN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to PSUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check PSUN's competition here
The Sports Authority Inc (NYSE: TSA)
AKA vs TSA Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check TSA's competition here
Cox Co. (NYSE: COX)
AKA vs COX Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check COX's competition here
Longs Drug Stores Corp. (NYSE: LDG)
AKA vs LDG Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LDG's competition here
Claire's Stores Inc. (AMEX: CLE)
AKA vs CLE Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CLE's competition here
Finish Line, Inc. (The) (NASDAQ: FINL)
AKA vs FINL Comparison July 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 118.7M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.97 on the NYSE, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check FINL's competition here