a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See AKA's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for AKA and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKA | $10.90 | +4.71% | 112.8M | -4.20 | -$2.48 | N/A |
| TJX | $127.24 | +0.55% | 140.6B | 25.45 | $5.00 | +1.41% |
| ROST | $226.61 | -1.25% | 72.7B | 27.43 | $8.26 | +0.76% |
| BURL | $237.12 | -1.01% | 14.9B | 20.33 | $11.66 | N/A |
| LULU | $98.06 | -1.34% | 11.1B | 7.91 | $12.39 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $20.54 | -1.58% | 7.4B | 10.17 | $2.02 | +3.31% |
| VSCO | $91.51 | +2.58% | 7.3B | 47.41 | $1.93 | N/A |
| URBN | $75.01 | -1.09% | 6.4B | 13.42 | $5.59 | N/A |
| VSXY | $77.93 | +0.58% | 6.2B | 40.18 | $1.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
The TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TJX)
AKA vs TJX Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while TJX trades at $127.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check TJX's competition here
Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROST)
AKA vs ROST Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while ROST trades at $226.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check ROST's competition here
Burlington Stores, Inc. (NYSE: BURL)
AKA vs BURL Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while BURL trades at $237.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BURL's competition here
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ: LULU)
AKA vs LULU Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while LULU trades at $98.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LULU's competition here
The Gap, Inc. (NYSE: GPS)
AKA vs GPS Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GPS's competition here
The Gap, Inc. (NYSE: GAP)
AKA vs GAP Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while GAP trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GAP's competition here
Victoria's Secret & Co. (NYSE: VSCO)
AKA vs VSCO Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while VSCO trades at $91.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 47.41. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check VSCO's competition here
Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ: URBN)
AKA vs URBN Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while URBN trades at $75.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check URBN's competition here
Victoria's Secret & Company (NYSE: VSXY)
AKA vs VSXY Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while VSXY trades at $77.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check VSXY's competition here
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (NYSE: ANF)
AKA vs ANF Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while ANF trades at $135.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check ANF's competition here
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BOOT)
AKA vs BOOT Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while BOOT trades at $122.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BOOT's competition here
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (NYSE: AEO)
AKA vs AEO Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while AEO trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check AEO's competition here
Foot Locker, Inc. (NYSE: FL)
AKA vs FL Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check FL's competition here
The Buckle, Inc. (NYSE: BKE)
AKA vs BKE Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while BKE trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BKE's competition here
Carter's Inc. (NYSE: CRI)
AKA vs CRI Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CRI trades at $29.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CRI's competition here
Hibbett, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIBB)
AKA vs HIBB Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check HIBB's competition here
Chico's FAS, Inc. (NYSE: CHS)
AKA vs CHS Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CHS's competition here
Guess', Inc. (NYSE: GES)
AKA vs GES Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GES's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GES's competition here
Citi Trends, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTRN)
AKA vs CTRN Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CTRN trades at $55.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 240.83. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CTRN's competition here
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCVL)
AKA vs SCVL Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 423.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while SCVL trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check SCVL's competition here
Caleres, Inc. (NYSE: CAL)
AKA vs CAL Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 393.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CAL trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CAL's competition here
Stitch Fix, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFIX)
AKA vs SFIX Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while SFIX trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check SFIX's competition here
Genesco Inc. (NYSE: GCO)
AKA vs GCO Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while GCO trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check GCO's competition here
Shoe Station Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SHOE)
AKA vs SHOE Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, SHOE has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while SHOE trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas SHOE's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SHOE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to SHOE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check SHOE's competition here
Lands' End, Inc. (NASDAQ: LE)
AKA vs LE Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while LE trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LE's competition here
J.Jill, Inc. (NYSE: JILL)
AKA vs JILL Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while JILL trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check JILL's competition here
Torrid Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CURV)
AKA vs CURV Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CURV trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CURV's competition here
Zumiez Inc. (NASDAQ: ZUMZ)
AKA vs ZUMZ Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while ZUMZ trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check ZUMZ's competition here
Duluth Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTH)
AKA vs DLTH Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while DLTH trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -25.18. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DLTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DLTH's competition here
Tilly's, Inc. (NYSE: TLYS)
AKA vs TLYS Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while TLYS trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TLYS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check TLYS's competition here
Rent the Runway, Inc. (NASDAQ: RENT)
AKA vs RENT Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while RENT trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check RENT's competition here
The Cato Corporation (NYSE: CATO)
AKA vs CATO Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CATO trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -252.00. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CATO's competition here
The Children's Place, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLCE)
AKA vs PLCE Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while PLCE trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check PLCE's competition here
Brillia Inc (AMEX: BRIA)
AKA vs BRIA Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while BRIA trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BRIA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check BRIA's competition here
Destination XL Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: DXLG)
AKA vs DXLG Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while DXLG trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DXLG's competition here
Digital Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: DBGIW)
AKA vs DBGIW Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -6.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DBGIW's competition here
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LVLU)
AKA vs LVLU Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while LVLU trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -9.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LVLU's competition here
Express, Inc. (NYSE: EXPR)
AKA vs EXPR Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check EXPR's competition here
Digital Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: DBGI)
AKA vs DBGI Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 915K. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while DBGI trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -6.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check DBGI's competition here
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: JEM)
AKA vs JEM Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 353.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while JEM trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JEM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to JEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check JEM's competition here
Cox Co. (NYSE: COX)
AKA vs COX Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check COX's competition here
Finish Line, Inc. (The) (NASDAQ: FINL)
AKA vs FINL Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check FINL's competition here
Claire's Stores Inc. (AMEX: CLE)
AKA vs CLE Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check CLE's competition here
Longs Drug Stores Corp. (NYSE: LDG)
AKA vs LDG Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check LDG's competition here
The Sports Authority Inc (NYSE: TSA)
AKA vs TSA Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check TSA's competition here
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (NASDAQ: PSUN)
AKA vs PSUN Comparison September 2026
a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (NYSE: AKA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKA stands at 112.8M. In comparison, PSUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKA is priced at $10.90 on the NYSE, while PSUN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKA currently has a P/E ratio of -4.20, whereas PSUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKA's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PSUN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AKA is less volatile compared to PSUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKA.Check PSUN's competition here