The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while AMZN trades at $254.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check AMZN's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 282.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BABA trades at $117.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BABA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while MELI trades at $1,843.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 48.63. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check MELI's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ORLY trades at $82.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ORLY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while SE trades at $111.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 35.57. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check SE's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while EBAY trades at $112.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check EBAY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while AZO trades at $2,970.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check AZO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while JD trades at $29.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check JD's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while CPNG trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -193.28. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check CPNG's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while CASY trades at $808.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check CASY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while WSM trades at $222.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check WSM's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ULTA trades at $466.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ULTA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BBY trades at $85.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BBY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while DKS trades at $208.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check DKS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while GPC trades at $121.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check GPC's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TSCO trades at $30.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TSCO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while W trades at $91.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas W's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check W's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while MUSA trades at $593.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check MUSA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while GME trades at $22.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check GME's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while CHWY trades at $21.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check CHWY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ETSY trades at $85.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ETSY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while VIPS trades at $14.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check VIPS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while GLBE trades at $38.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 59.97. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check GLBE's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BBWI trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BBWI's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ABG trades at $218.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ABG's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while MNSO trades at $12.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check MNSO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while RH trades at $190.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 45.30. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check RH's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while AAP trades at $52.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check AAP's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ASO trades at $47.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ASO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check OZON's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BOBS trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BOBS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while RVLV trades at $24.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check RVLV's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while EYE trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check EYE's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while SVV trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check SVV's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while RERE trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check RERE's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while CRI trades at $38.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check CRI's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while SBH trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check SBH's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check OLPX's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while LQDT trades at $39.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check LQDT's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TANNI's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 939M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while HEPS trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check HEPS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 863.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ARKO trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ARKO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 858.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TDUP trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -51.15. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TDUP's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ODP's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check OSTK's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 765.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while HZO trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 124.14. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check HZO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 739.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while WOOF trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check WOOF's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 673.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BWMX trades at $18.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BWMX's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BYON's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 555.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while EVGO trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check EVGO's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 536.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while EVGOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check EVGOW's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check DADA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 470M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while ZKH trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -74.94. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check ZKH's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BNED trades at $12.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BNED's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 430.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BBW trades at $34.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BBW's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 424.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while JMIA trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check JMIA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 398.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BBBY trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BBBY's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 355.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while LE trades at $11.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check LE's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 287.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while NEGG trades at $13.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check NEGG's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check FTCH's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 250M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while FLWS trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check FLWS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check QRTEA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while DIBS trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check DIBS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BZUN trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BZUN's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while CHPT trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check CHPT's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check VLTA's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check JMG's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check QRTEP's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check GOED's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check APRN's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while GRWG trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check GRWG's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BARK trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BARK's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while HOUR trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check HOUR's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check OTH's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while NPT trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check NPT's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while NXB trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NXB's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check NXB's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check QRTEB's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check CTIB's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while PRTS trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check PRTS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while SPWH trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check SPWH's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check KIRK's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check SSU's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BGFV's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check DTC's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while LITB trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check LITB's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TBHC's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while NHTC trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check NHTC's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check QVCGP's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TLF trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TLF's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while MOGU trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check MOGU's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check BOXD's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TCS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TCS's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while YJ trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check YJ's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while TKAT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check TKAT's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, PIK has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while PIK trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas PIK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PIK's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to PIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check PIK's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, JWEL has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while JWEL trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas JWEL's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JWEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to JWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check JWEL's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, JOAN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while JOAN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas JOAN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JOAN's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is less volatile compared to JOAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check JOAN's competition here

HNST plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNST stands at 441.4M. In comparison, NAAS has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, HNST is priced at $4.01, while NAAS trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNST currently has a P/E ratio of 74.55, whereas NAAS's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HNST's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NAAS's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HNST is more volatile compared to NAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNST.Check NAAS's competition here