Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while AMZN trades at $271.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check AMZN's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 293.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BABA trades at $122.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BABA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while PDD trades at $88.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check PDD's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while MELI trades at $1,877.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check MELI's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ORLY trades at $89.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ORLY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while SE trades at $106.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check SE's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while EBAY trades at $114.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check EBAY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while AZO trades at $3,016.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check AZO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while JD trades at $33.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check JD's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while CASY trades at $871.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check CASY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while CPNG trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -181.83. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check CPNG's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while WSM trades at $228.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check WSM's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BBY trades at $86.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BBY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while GPC trades at $124.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check GPC's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while DKS trades at $195.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check DKS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while TSCO trades at $30.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check TSCO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while FIVE trades at $217.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check FIVE's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while MUSA trades at $607.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check MUSA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while W trades at $84.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas W's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check W's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while GME trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check GME's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while CHWY trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check CHWY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ETSY trades at $81.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ETSY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while VIPS trades at $15.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check VIPS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while GLBE trades at $39.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 60.48. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check GLBE's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BBWI trades at $20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BBWI's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while MNSO trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check MNSO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while AAP trades at $55.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check AAP's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while WRBY trades at $26.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 98.93. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check WRBY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while RH trades at $165.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check RH's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ASO trades at $47.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ASO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check OZON's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BOBS trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BOBS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while RVLV trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check RVLV's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while EYE trades at $22.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check EYE's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while SVV trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check SVV's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while RERE trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check RERE's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while SBH trades at $14.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check SBH's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while CRI trades at $38.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check CRI's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check OLPX's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check TA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while LQDT trades at $38.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check LQDT's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while WINA trades at $333.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check WINA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check TANNI's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while HEPS trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check HEPS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 903.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ARKO trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ARKO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ODP's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 796.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while WOOF trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check WOOF's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check OSTK's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 758.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while HZO trades at $34.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 123.04. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check HZO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while TDUP trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -44.46. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check TDUP's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 635.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BWMX trades at $17.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BWMX's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BYON's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ELA trades at $21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ELA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check DADA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 495.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while EVGO trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check EVGO's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 474.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ZKH trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -75.71. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ZKH's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BNED trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BNED's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BBW trades at $33.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BBW's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 376.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BBBY trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BBBY's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while JMIA trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check JMIA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while NEGG trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check NEGG's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check FTCH's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while FLWS trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check FLWS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check QRTEA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ONEW trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ONEW's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while HITI trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to HITI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check HITI's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BZUN trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BZUN's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check VLTA's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while DIBS trades at $4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check DIBS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while CHPT trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check CHPT's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check JMG's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check QRTEP's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check GOED's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check APRN's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while GRWG trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check GRWG's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BARK trades at $9.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BARK's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while PEW-WT trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check PEW-WT's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while PEW trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check PEW's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while NPT trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -78.25. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check NPT's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while HOUR trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check HOUR's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check OTH's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check QRTEB's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check CTIB's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while SPWH trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check SPWH's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while PRTS trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check PRTS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while PETS trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PETS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to PETS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check PETS's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while ABLV trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check ABLV's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check KIRK's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check SSU's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BGFV's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check DTC's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while LITB trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check LITB's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check TBHC's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check QVCGP's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while TLF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check TLF's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while NHTC trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check NHTC's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while MOGU trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check MOGU's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check BOXD's competition here

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULTA stands at 22B. In comparison, FRTT has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ULTA is priced at $512.83 on the NASDAQ, while FRTT trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULTA currently has a P/E ratio of 19.23, whereas FRTT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ULTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FRTT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULTA is less volatile compared to FRTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULTA.Check FRTT's competition here