TravelCenters of America Inc. (TA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | $86.00 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 9.03 | $9.52 | N/A |
| AMZN | $234.66 | -3.98% | 2.5T | 30.15 | $7.72 | N/A |
| BABA | $102.54 | -4.26% | 251.7B | 27.83 | $3.77 | +1.01% |
| PDD | $76.58 | -3.75% | 111.2B | 8.18 | $9.55 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,587.70 | -2.90% | 80.6B | 41.89 | $37.94 | N/A |
| ORLY | $87.36 | +0.60% | 71B | 27.80 | $3.08 | N/A |
| SE | $91.52 | +0.26% | 54.6B | 35.07 | $2.54 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,035.70 | -0.94% | 48.2B | 20.31 | $145.26 | N/A |
| EBAY | $109.09 | +0.78% | 46.6B | 24.24 | $4.33 | +1.12% |
| JD | $26.09 | -5.37% | 36.5B | 19.72 | $1.37 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
TA vs AMZN Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AMZN trades at $234.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AMZN's competition here
TA vs BABA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 251.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BABA trades at $102.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BABA's competition here
TA vs PDD Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while PDD trades at $76.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check PDD's competition here
TA vs MELI Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MELI trades at $1,587.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MELI's competition here
TA vs ORLY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ORLY trades at $87.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ORLY's competition here
TA vs SE Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SE trades at $91.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SE's competition here
TA vs AZO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AZO trades at $3,035.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AZO's competition here
TA vs EBAY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EBAY trades at $109.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EBAY's competition here
TA vs JD Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JD trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JD's competition here
TA vs CPNG Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CPNG trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -173.05. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CPNG's competition here
TA vs CASY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CASY trades at $829.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CASY's competition here
TA vs WSM Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WSM trades at $226.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WSM's competition here
TA vs DKS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DKS trades at $236.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DKS's competition here
TA vs ULTA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ULTA trades at $461.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ULTA's competition here
TA vs BBY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBY trades at $74.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBY's competition here
TA vs TSCO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TSCO trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TSCO's competition here
TA vs GPC Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GPC trades at $106.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 238.84. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GPC's competition here
TA vs W Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while W trades at $84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas W's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check W's competition here
TA vs CART Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CART trades at $46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CART's competition here
TA vs MUSA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MUSA trades at $552.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MUSA's competition here
TA vs GME Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GME trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GME's competition here
TA vs CHWY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CHWY trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CHWY's competition here
TA vs ETSY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ETSY trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ETSY's competition here
TA vs VIPS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while VIPS trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check VIPS's competition here
TA vs GLBE Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GLBE trades at $31.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 47.03. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GLBE's competition here
TA vs BBWI Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBWI trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBWI's competition here
TA vs MNSO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MNSO trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MNSO's competition here
TA vs AAP Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AAP trades at $55.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 49.49. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AAP's competition here
TA vs ASO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ASO trades at $50.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ASO's competition here
TA vs RH Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RH trades at $141.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RH's competition here
TA vs OZON Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OZON's competition here
TA vs BOBS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BOBS trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BOBS's competition here
TA vs SVV Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SVV trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 68.79. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SVV's competition here
TA vs RVLV Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RVLV trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RVLV's competition here
TA vs OLPX Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OLPX trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is -103.00. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OLPX's competition here
TA vs EYE Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EYE trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EYE's competition here
TA vs RERE Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while RERE trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check RERE's competition here
TA vs SBH Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SBH trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SBH's competition here
TA vs LQDT Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LQDT trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LQDT's competition here
TA vs TANNI Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TANNI's competition here
TA vs HEPS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 920M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HEPS trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HEPS's competition here
TA vs ODP Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA and ODP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODP's competition here
TA vs ARKO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 836.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ARKO trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ARKO's competition here
TA vs OSTK Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check OSTK's competition here
TA vs HZO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 766.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HZO trades at $34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HZO's competition here
TA vs TDUP Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 762.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TDUP trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -32.83. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TDUP's competition here
TA vs WOOF Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 711.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while WOOF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 124.50. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check WOOF's competition here
TA vs BWMX Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 649.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BWMX trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BWMX's competition here
TA vs EVGOW Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 621.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EVGOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EVGOW's competition here
TA vs EVGO Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while EVGO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check EVGO's competition here
TA vs BYON Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BYON's competition here
TA vs DADA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DADA's competition here
TA vs BBBY Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 432.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBBY trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBBY's competition here
TA vs JMIA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JMIA trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JMIA's competition here
TA vs ZKH Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while ZKH trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -49.50. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check ZKH's competition here
TA vs BBW Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 399.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BBW trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BBW's competition here
TA vs HNST Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 383.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HNST trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -20.47. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HNST's competition here
TA vs NEGG Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NEGG trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is 67.92. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NEGG's competition here
TA vs BNED Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 367M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BNED trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -36.90. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BNED's competition here
TA vs LE Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LE trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LE's competition here
TA vs YSG Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 291.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while YSG trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check YSG's competition here
TA vs FTCH Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FTCH's competition here
TA vs FLWS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while FLWS trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check FLWS's competition here
TA vs QRTEA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEA's competition here
TA vs CHPT Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CHPT trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CHPT's competition here
TA vs BZUN Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 158.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BZUN trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BZUN's competition here
TA vs VLTA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check VLTA's competition here
TA vs DIBS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DIBS trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DIBS's competition here
TA vs JMG Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JMG's competition here
TA vs QRTEP Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEP's competition here
TA vs GOED Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GOED's competition here
TA vs APRN Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check APRN's competition here
TA vs AKA Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while AKA trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check AKA's competition here
TA vs GRWG Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while GRWG trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check GRWG's competition here
TA vs BARK Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BARK trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BARK's competition here
TA vs HOUR Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while HOUR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check HOUR's competition here
TA vs NPT Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -64.00. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NPT's competition here
TA vs PRTS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while PRTS trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check PRTS's competition here
TA vs QRTEB Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QRTEB's competition here
TA vs NXB Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NXB trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NXB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NXB's competition here
TA vs SPWH Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SPWH trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SPWH's competition here
TA vs CTIB Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CTIB's competition here
TA vs KIRK Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check KIRK's competition here
TA vs SSU Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check SSU's competition here
TA vs BGFV Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TA and BGFV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGFV's competition here
TA vs DTC Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check DTC's competition here
TA vs LITB Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while LITB trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check LITB's competition here
TA vs TBHC Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TBHC's competition here
TA vs QVCGP Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check QVCGP's competition here
TA vs TLF Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TLF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TLF's competition here
TA vs NHTC Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while NHTC trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check NHTC's competition here
TA vs MOGU Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while MOGU trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check MOGU's competition here
TA vs BOXD Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check BOXD's competition here
TA vs JBDI Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JBDI trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JBDI's competition here
TA vs TCS Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TCS's competition here
TA vs CGTL Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while CGTL trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check CGTL's competition here
TA vs YJ Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while YJ trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TA and YJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YJ's competition here
TA vs TKAT Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKAT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while TKAT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TKAT's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TKAT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to TKAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check TKAT's competition here
TA vs JWEL Comparison June 2026
TA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JWEL has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TA is priced at $86.00, while JWEL trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas JWEL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TA's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JWEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TA is less volatile compared to JWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TA.Check JWEL's competition here