Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See LQDT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for LQDT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQDT | $38.98 | +2.12% | 1.2B | 26.88 | $1.45 | N/A |
| AMZN | $271.58 | +15.32% | 2.9T | 32.49 | $8.36 | N/A |
| BABA | $122.25 | +5.10% | 293.1B | 32.44 | $3.77 | +0.86% |
| PDD | $88.56 | +1.28% | 126.1B | 8.90 | $9.95 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,877.95 | -0.41% | 95.2B | 49.56 | $37.89 | N/A |
| ORLY | $89.35 | +2.28% | 74B | 29.20 | $3.06 | N/A |
| SE | $106.74 | +0.47% | 64B | 34.08 | $3.13 | N/A |
| EBAY | $114.01 | +0.43% | 50.6B | 19.66 | $5.80 | +1.05% |
| AZO | $3,016.25 | +0.32% | 49.3B | 20.75 | $145.45 | N/A |
| JD | $33.01 | +2.17% | 46.3B | 16.26 | $2.03 | +3.04% |
Stock Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN)
LQDT vs AMZN Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while AMZN trades at $271.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check AMZN's competition here
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA)
LQDT vs BABA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 293.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BABA trades at $122.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BABA's competition here
PDD Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: PDD)
LQDT vs PDD Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while PDD trades at $88.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check PDD's competition here
MercadoLibre, Inc. (NASDAQ: MELI)
LQDT vs MELI Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while MELI trades at $1,877.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check MELI's competition here
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ: ORLY)
LQDT vs ORLY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ORLY trades at $89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ORLY's competition here
Sea Limited (NYSE: SE)
LQDT vs SE Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while SE trades at $106.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check SE's competition here
eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY)
LQDT vs EBAY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while EBAY trades at $114.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check EBAY's competition here
AutoZone, Inc. (NYSE: AZO)
LQDT vs AZO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while AZO trades at $3,016.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check AZO's competition here
JD.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: JD)
LQDT vs JD Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while JD trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check JD's competition here
Casey's General Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: CASY)
LQDT vs CASY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while CASY trades at $871.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check CASY's competition here
Coupang, Inc. (NYSE: CPNG)
LQDT vs CPNG Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while CPNG trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -181.83. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check CPNG's competition here
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (NYSE: WSM)
LQDT vs WSM Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while WSM trades at $228.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check WSM's competition here
Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA)
LQDT vs ULTA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ULTA trades at $512.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ULTA's competition here
Best Buy Co., Inc. (NYSE: BBY)
LQDT vs BBY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BBY trades at $86.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BBY's competition here
Genuine Parts Company (NYSE: GPC)
LQDT vs GPC Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while GPC trades at $124.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check GPC's competition here
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (NYSE: DKS)
LQDT vs DKS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while DKS trades at $195.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check DKS's competition here
Tractor Supply Company (NASDAQ: TSCO)
LQDT vs TSCO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while TSCO trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check TSCO's competition here
Five Below, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVE)
LQDT vs FIVE Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while FIVE trades at $217.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check FIVE's competition here
Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA)
LQDT vs MUSA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while MUSA trades at $607.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check MUSA's competition here
Wayfair Inc. (NYSE: W)
LQDT vs W Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while W trades at $84.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas W's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check W's competition here
GameStop Corp. (NYSE: GME)
LQDT vs GME Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while GME trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check GME's competition here
Chewy, Inc. (NYSE: CHWY)
LQDT vs CHWY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while CHWY trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check CHWY's competition here
Etsy, Inc. (NYSE: ETSY)
LQDT vs ETSY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ETSY trades at $81.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ETSY's competition here
Vipshop Holdings Limited (NYSE: VIPS)
LQDT vs VIPS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while VIPS trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check VIPS's competition here
Global-e Online Ltd. (NASDAQ: GLBE)
LQDT vs GLBE Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while GLBE trades at $39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 60.48. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check GLBE's competition here
Bath & Body Works, Inc. (NYSE: BBWI)
LQDT vs BBWI Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BBWI trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BBWI's competition here
MINISO Group Holding Limited (NYSE: MNSO)
LQDT vs MNSO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while MNSO trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check MNSO's competition here
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (NYSE: AAP)
LQDT vs AAP Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while AAP trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check AAP's competition here
Warby Parker Inc. (NYSE: WRBY)
LQDT vs WRBY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while WRBY trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 98.93. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check WRBY's competition here
Rh (NYSE: RH)
LQDT vs RH Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while RH trades at $165.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check RH's competition here
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASO)
LQDT vs ASO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ASO trades at $47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ASO's competition here
Ozon Holdings PLC (NASDAQ: OZON)
LQDT vs OZON Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check OZON's competition here
Bob's Discount Furniture, Inc. (NYSE: BOBS)
LQDT vs BOBS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BOBS trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BOBS's competition here
Revolve Group, Inc. (NYSE: RVLV)
LQDT vs RVLV Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while RVLV trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check RVLV's competition here
National Vision Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EYE)
LQDT vs EYE Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while EYE trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check EYE's competition here
Savers Value Village, Inc. (NYSE: SVV)
LQDT vs SVV Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while SVV trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check SVV's competition here
ATRenew Inc. (NYSE: RERE)
LQDT vs RERE Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while RERE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check RERE's competition here
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SBH)
LQDT vs SBH Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while SBH trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check SBH's competition here
Carter's Inc. (NYSE: CRI)
LQDT vs CRI Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while CRI trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check CRI's competition here
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OLPX)
LQDT vs OLPX Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while OLPX trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check OLPX's competition here
TravelCenters of America Inc. (NASDAQ: TA)
LQDT vs TA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check TA's competition here
Winmark Corporation (NASDAQ: WINA)
LQDT vs WINA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while WINA trades at $333.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check WINA's competition here
TravelCenters of America LLC SR NT 8.25%2028 (NASDAQ: TANNI)
LQDT vs TANNI Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check TANNI's competition here
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. (NASDAQ: HEPS)
LQDT vs HEPS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while HEPS trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check HEPS's competition here
Arko Corp. (NASDAQ: ARKO)
LQDT vs ARKO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 903.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ARKO trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ARKO's competition here
The ODP Corporation (NASDAQ: ODP)
LQDT vs ODP Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ODP's competition here
Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: WOOF)
LQDT vs WOOF Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 796.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while WOOF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check WOOF's competition here
Overstock.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSTK)
LQDT vs OSTK Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check OSTK's competition here
MarineMax, Inc. (NYSE: HZO)
LQDT vs HZO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 758.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while HZO trades at $34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 123.04. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check HZO's competition here
ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ: TDUP)
LQDT vs TDUP Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while TDUP trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -44.46. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check TDUP's competition here
Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (NYSE: BWMX)
LQDT vs BWMX Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 635.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BWMX trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BWMX's competition here
Beyond, Inc. (NYSE: BYON)
LQDT vs BYON Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BYON's competition here
Envela Corporation (AMEX: ELA)
LQDT vs ELA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ELA trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ELA's competition here
Dada Nexus Limited (NASDAQ: DADA)
LQDT vs DADA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check DADA's competition here
EVgo, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVGO)
LQDT vs EVGO Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 495.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while EVGO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check EVGO's competition here
ZKH Group Limited (NYSE: ZKH)
LQDT vs ZKH Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 474.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ZKH trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -75.71. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ZKH's competition here
Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (NYSE: BNED)
LQDT vs BNED Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BNED trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BNED's competition here
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (NYSE: BBW)
LQDT vs BBW Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BBW trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BBW's competition here
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (NYSE: BBBY)
LQDT vs BBBY Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 376.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BBBY trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BBBY's competition here
Jumia Technologies AG (NYSE: JMIA)
LQDT vs JMIA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while JMIA trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check JMIA's competition here
Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ: NEGG)
LQDT vs NEGG Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while NEGG trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check NEGG's competition here
Farfetch Limited (NYSE: FTCH)
LQDT vs FTCH Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check FTCH's competition here
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLWS)
LQDT vs FLWS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while FLWS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check FLWS's competition here
Qurate Retail, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRTEA)
LQDT vs QRTEA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check QRTEA's competition here
OneWater Marine Inc. (NASDAQ: ONEW)
LQDT vs ONEW Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ONEW trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ONEW's competition here
High Tide Inc. (NASDAQ: HITI)
LQDT vs HITI Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while HITI trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to HITI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check HITI's competition here
Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN)
LQDT vs BZUN Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BZUN trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BZUN's competition here
Volta Inc. (NYSE: VLTA)
LQDT vs VLTA Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check VLTA's competition here
1stdibs.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: DIBS)
LQDT vs DIBS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while DIBS trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check DIBS's competition here
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CHPT)
LQDT vs CHPT Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while CHPT trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check CHPT's competition here
JM Group Limited (AMEX: JMG)
LQDT vs JMG Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check JMG's competition here
Qurate Retail, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRTEP)
LQDT vs QRTEP Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check QRTEP's competition here
Polished.com Inc. (AMEX: GOED)
LQDT vs GOED Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check GOED's competition here
Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: APRN)
LQDT vs APRN Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check APRN's competition here
GrowGeneration Corp. (NASDAQ: GRWG)
LQDT vs GRWG Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while GRWG trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check GRWG's competition here
BARK, Inc. (NYSE: BARK)
LQDT vs BARK Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BARK trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BARK's competition here
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. WT (NYSE: PEW-WT)
LQDT vs PEW-WT Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while PEW-WT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check PEW-WT's competition here
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. (NYSE: PEW)
LQDT vs PEW Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while PEW trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to PEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check PEW's competition here
Texxon Holding Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NPT)
LQDT vs NPT Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while NPT trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -78.25. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check NPT's competition here
Hour Loop, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOUR)
LQDT vs HOUR Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while HOUR trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check HOUR's competition here
Off The Hook YS Inc. (AMEX: OTH)
LQDT vs OTH Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while OTH trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check OTH's competition here
Qurate Retail, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRTEB)
LQDT vs QRTEB Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check QRTEB's competition here
Yunhong CTI Ltd. (NASDAQ: CTIB)
LQDT vs CTIB Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check CTIB's competition here
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SPWH)
LQDT vs SPWH Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while SPWH trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check SPWH's competition here
CarParts.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRTS)
LQDT vs PRTS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while PRTS trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check PRTS's competition here
PetMed Express, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETS)
LQDT vs PETS Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while PETS trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PETS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to PETS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check PETS's competition here
Able View Inc. (NASDAQ: ABLV)
LQDT vs ABLV Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while ABLV trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check ABLV's competition here
Kirkland's, Inc. (NASDAQ: KIRK)
LQDT vs KIRK Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check KIRK's competition here
SIGNA Sports United N.V. (NYSE: SSU)
LQDT vs SSU Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check SSU's competition here
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (NASDAQ: BGFV)
LQDT vs BGFV Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BGFV's competition here
Solo Brands, Inc. (NYSE: DTC)
LQDT vs DTC Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check DTC's competition here
LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: LITB)
LQDT vs LITB Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while LITB trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check LITB's competition here
The Brand House Collective, Inc. (NASDAQ: TBHC)
LQDT vs TBHC Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check TBHC's competition here
QVC Group Inc. (NASDAQ: QVCGP)
LQDT vs QVCGP Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check QVCGP's competition here
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (NASDAQ: TLF)
LQDT vs TLF Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while TLF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check TLF's competition here
Natural Health Trends Corp. (NASDAQ: NHTC)
LQDT vs NHTC Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while NHTC trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check NHTC's competition here
MOGU Inc. (NYSE: MOGU)
LQDT vs MOGU Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while MOGU trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check MOGU's competition here
Boxed, Inc. (NYSE: BOXD)
LQDT vs BOXD Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check BOXD's competition here
Fort Technology Inc. Common Shares (NASDAQ: FRTT)
LQDT vs FRTT Comparison August 2026
Liquidity Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: LQDT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LQDT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FRTT has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, LQDT is priced at $38.98 on the NASDAQ, while FRTT trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LQDT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.88, whereas FRTT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LQDT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRTT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LQDT is more volatile compared to FRTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LQDT.Check FRTT's competition here