Flowers Foods, Inc.
Flowers Foods, Inc. FLO Peers
See (FLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLO | $17.30 | +1.35% | 3.65B | 14.79 | $1.17 | +5.60% |
| KHC | $27.74 | +0.91% | 32.83B | 12.67 | $2.19 | +5.77% |
| GIS | $55.13 | +1.34% | 30.19B | 12.12 | $4.55 | +4.35% |
| MKC | $75.39 | +0.87% | 20.21B | 26.00 | $2.90 | +2.31% |
| MKC-V | $74.57 | +1.76% | 20.04B | 25.71 | $2.90 | +2.31% |
| HRL | $30.53 | +1.21% | 16.79B | 22.12 | $1.38 | +3.76% |
| SJM | $114.83 | -1.24% | 12.22B | -47.65 | -$2.41 | +3.81% |
| PPC | $48.64 | +2.88% | 11.53B | 9.57 | $5.08 | +13.00% |
| CAG | $22.97 | +0.88% | 10.97B | 33.78 | $0.68 | +6.10% |
| CPB | $35.52 | +1.60% | 10.59B | 20.53 | $1.73 | +4.28% |
Stock Comparison
FLO vs KHC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while KHC trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs GIS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 30.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while GIS trades at $55.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs MKC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while MKC trades at $75.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs MKC-V Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while MKC-V trades at $74.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs HRL Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while HRL trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SJM Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SJM trades at $114.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs PPC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while PPC trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs CAG Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while CAG trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs CPB Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 10.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while CPB trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs INGR Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while INGR trades at $140.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BRBR Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BRBR trades at $65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs LW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while LW trades at $53.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs POST Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while POST trades at $111.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BRFS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BRFS trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs DAR Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while DAR trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs LANC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while LANC trades at $169.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs TWNK Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs TWNKW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs FRPT Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while FRPT trades at $87.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 292.17. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SMPL Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SMPL trades at $35.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs NOMD Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while NOMD trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SOVO Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs JJSF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while JJSF trades at $116.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs CENT Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while CENT trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs CENTA Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while CENTA trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs KLG Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while KLG trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs THS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while THS trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs UTZ Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while UTZ trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs JBSS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 749.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while JBSS trades at $63.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs WEST Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 741.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while WEST trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs STKL Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 740.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while STKL trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs HLF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 719.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while HLF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SENEB Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 642.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SENEB trades at $93.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SENEA Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 626.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SENEA trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs USNA Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 562.81M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while USNA trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs THRN Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BGS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 353.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BGS trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs LWAY Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 340.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while LWAY trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs NATR Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 272.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while NATR trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs MAMA Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 257.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while MAMA trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 85.63. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BYND Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 211.83M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BYND trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs FREE Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.57M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs HAIN Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 177.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while HAIN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs LFVN Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 168.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while LFVN trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs WESTW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BRCC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 155.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BRCC trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -21.89. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs MMMB Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BRLS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 117.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BRLS trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs PLIN Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.62M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs ATPC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 102.51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while ATPC trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs WYHG Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 81.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while WYHG trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs LSF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 73.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while LSF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -77.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BRID Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 70.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BRID trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs PAVS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 65.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while PAVS trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs MITC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs ABVE Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 37.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while ABVE trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs FARM Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 32.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while FARM trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs CLXT Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs HAPP Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs YGF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BOF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 20.61M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BOF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs ORIS Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 20.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while ORIS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs NAII Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 20.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while NAII trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs JVA Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 19.75M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while JVA trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs COOT Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while COOT trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs NCRA Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 13.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while NCRA trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs TTCF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.22M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs DDC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 13.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while DDC trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs PETZ Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 9.28M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while PETZ trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs PLAG Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 9.25M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while PLAG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs NUZE Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -16.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs HCWC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 6.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while HCWC trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs IMG Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 5.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while IMG trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BTTR Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs CYAN Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while CYAN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs FREEW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BRLSW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BRLSW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs STKH Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while STKH trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs FAMI Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while FAMI trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs RGF Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs ABVEW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SNAX Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SNAX trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BTOG Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BTOG trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BSFC Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 939516.00. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BSFC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs BON Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 310741.00. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while BON trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SNAXW Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 30049.00. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs RIBT Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 4002.00. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.
FLO vs SMFL Comparison
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 3.65B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 341.00. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $17.30, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.