Smart Share Global Limited
Smart Share Global Limited (EM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM | $1.15 | +0.00% | 145.8M | -115.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ROL | $60.92 | -0.70% | 29.1B | 55.42 | $1.09 | +1.12% |
| SCI | $80.70 | +1.89% | 11.1B | 20.91 | $3.80 | +1.64% |
| BFAM | $71.06 | -1.78% | 4B | 21.24 | $3.36 | N/A |
| FTDR | $55.60 | -1.24% | 4B | 15.76 | $3.49 | N/A |
| HRB | $30.83 | +1.45% | 3.7B | 6.78 | $4.28 | +5.53% |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $6.97 | -0.85% | 2.3B | 25.89 | $0.27 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CSV | $44.22 | -1.43% | 696.9M | 14.32 | $3.09 | +1.01% |
Stock Comparison
EM vs ROL Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while ROL trades at $60.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 55.42. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check ROL's competition here
EM vs SCI Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while SCI trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check SCI's competition here
EM vs BFAM Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while BFAM trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check BFAM's competition here
EM vs FTDR Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while FTDR trades at $55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check FTDR's competition here
EM vs HRB Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while HRB trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check HRB's competition here
EM vs DSEY Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check DSEY's competition here
EM vs MCW Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while MCW trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MCW's competition here
EM vs ROVR Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check ROVR's competition here
EM vs CSV Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while CSV trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check CSV's competition here
EM vs WW Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while WW trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas WW's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WW's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check WW's competition here
EM vs MED Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while MED trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas MED's P/E ratio is 530.75. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MED's competition here
EM vs RGS Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while RGS trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check RGS's competition here
EM vs XSPA Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check XSPA's competition here
EM vs EJH Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while EJH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check EJH's competition here
EM vs YYGH Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while YYGH trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check YYGH's competition here
EM vs MRM Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while MRM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MRM's competition here
EM vs XWEL Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while XWEL trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check XWEL's competition here
EM vs BYAH Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while BYAH trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BYAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check BYAH's competition here
EM vs TRNR Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 328.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while TRNR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check TRNR's competition here
EM vs IVP Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while IVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check IVP's competition here
EM vs STON Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check STON's competition here
EM vs NEBCU Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check NEBCU's competition here
EM vs TMX Comparison February 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.15, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -115.00, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check TMX's competition here