Cycurion, Inc. Warrant

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 218.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while IBM trades at $234.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check IBM's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while ACN trades at $237.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check ACN's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while FISV trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check FISV's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while FI trades at $132.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check FI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while INFY trades at $16.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check INFY's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CTSH trades at $68.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CTSH's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while BR trades at $262.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check BR's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while WIT trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check WIT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while LDOS trades at $178.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check LDOS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CDW trades at $164.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CDW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while GIB trades at $93.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check GIB's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while IT trades at $229.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check IT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while AUR trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check AUR's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while JKHY trades at $159.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check JKHY's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while AUROW trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check AUROW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CACI trades at $477.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CACI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while EPAM trades at $152.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check EPAM's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while G trades at $43.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check G's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while DLB trades at $72.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check DLB's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while EXLS trades at $42.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check EXLS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while KD trades at $29.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check KD's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while GDS trades at $36.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 330.09. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check GDS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while WAY trades at $34.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check WAY's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SAIC trades at $117.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SAIC's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while INGM trades at $19.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check INGM's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while PAY trades at $35.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 81.18. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check PAY's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while APLD trades at $14.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check APLD's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check NCR's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while GLOB trades at $75.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check GLOB's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while WNS trades at $75.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check WNS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CD trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CD's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CNXC trades at $46.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CNXC's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CLVT trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CLVT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check PRFT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while DXC trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check DXC's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while AI trades at $16.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check AI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while ASGN trades at $50.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check ASGN's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while BBAI-WT trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while VNET trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -780.00. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check VNET's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while FORTY trades at $112.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check FORTY's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while BBAI trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check BBAI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while VYX trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -23.76. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check VYX's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while NYAX trades at $43.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 243.61. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check NYAX's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while TASK trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check TASK's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check TWKS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while FLYW trades at $11.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 235.60. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to FLYW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check FLYW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while NABL trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 744.50. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check NABL's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while INOD trades at $42.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check INOD's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 923.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while MGIC trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check MGIC's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 820.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while PSFE trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -691.50. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check PSFE's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 803.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CTLP trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CTLP's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 698.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 671.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while GDYN trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check GDYN's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 601.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while PHLT trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -95.19. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check PHLT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 576.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while HCKT trades at $20.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check HCKT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 531M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while XRX trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check XRX's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 465.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while TSSI trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 53.14. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check TSSI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while LZMH trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is 293.00. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check LZMH's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 412.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CNDT trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CNDT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while IBEX trades at $28.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check IBEX's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 385.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while TLS trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check TLS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SDHIU trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +16.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SDHIU's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while UIS trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check UIS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check BULLZ's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 248.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while DMRC trades at $11.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check DMRC's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 242.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while III trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas III's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check III's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SRT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while TTEC trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check TTEC's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CTG's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while LHSW trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 46.20. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check LHSW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check ALYA's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CTM trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CTM's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CSPI trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -69.75. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CSPI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check NOTE-WT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SAIHW trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SAIHW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while NOTE trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check NOTE's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SAIH trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SAIH's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while GMM trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check GMM's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while VEEAW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check VEEAW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while BTCM trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check BTCM's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while VEEA trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +12.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check VEEA's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while DVLT trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check DVLT's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while USIO trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check USIO's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while DTST trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 234.15. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check DTST's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while WYY trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check WYY's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CLPS trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CLPS's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while JFU trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check JFU's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while GLE trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 42.51. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check GLE's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while CYCU trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check CYCU's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while MASK trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check MASK's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -9.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SGLB's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while ARBB trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check ARBB's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while TDTH trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to TDTH's ROE of -7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check TDTH's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while JDZG trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check JDZG's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to SASI's ROE of -3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check SASI's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check WAVD's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while DTSTW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is more volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check DTSTW's competition here

CYCUW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYCUW stands at 10.4M. In comparison, AVCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYCUW is priced at $0.06, while AVCT trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYCUW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYCUW's ROE is -1.86%, compared to AVCT's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYCUW is less volatile compared to AVCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYCUW.Check AVCT's competition here