Conduent Incorporated
Conduent Incorporated CNDT Peers
See (CNDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNDT | $2.25 | +0.90% | 364.12M | 1.56 | $1.44 | N/A |
| IBM | $266.81 | +0.05% | 247.97B | 45.69 | $5.84 | +2.51% |
| ACN | $317.77 | -1.68% | 198.93B | 26.18 | $12.14 | +1.80% |
| FISV | $114.23 | N/A | 116.20B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $166.66 | +4.73% | 92.40B | 29.45 | $5.66 | N/A |
| INFY | $18.32 | -2.16% | 75.90B | 24.10 | $0.76 | +3.19% |
| CTSH | $81.44 | +0.10% | 40.15B | 17.15 | $4.75 | +1.49% |
| IT | $448.29 | +0.40% | 34.50B | 27.97 | $16.03 | N/A |
| WIT | $2.96 | -1.33% | 30.97B | 19.73 | $0.15 | +0.01% |
| BR | $241.11 | +0.33% | 28.32B | 36.20 | $6.66 | +1.43% |
Stock Comparison
CNDT vs IBM Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 247.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while IBM trades at $266.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 45.69. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs ACN Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 198.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while ACN trades at $317.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs FISV Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs FI Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 92.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while FI trades at $166.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs INFY Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 75.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while INFY trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CTSH Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 40.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CTSH trades at $81.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs IT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 34.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while IT trades at $448.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs WIT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 30.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while WIT trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs BR Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 28.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while BR trades at $241.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CDW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 24.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CDW trades at $189.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs GIB Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 24.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while GIB trades at $108.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs LDOS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 20.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while LDOS trades at $159.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs JKHY Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while JKHY trades at $182.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs AUR Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while AUR trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs AUROW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 11.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while AUROW trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CACI Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CACI trades at $478.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs EPAM Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while EPAM trades at $183.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs KD Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while KD trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs G Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while G trades at $44.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas G's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs EXLS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while EXLS trades at $46.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs DLB Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while DLB trades at $77.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs WAY Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while WAY trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 302.62. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SAIC Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SAIC trades at $123.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs GDS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while GDS trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is -46.95. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs PAY Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while PAY trades at $38.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 97.28. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs INGM Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while INGM trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs GLOB Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while GLOB trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs NCR Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CNXC Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CNXC trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs AI Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while AI trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CD Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CLVT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CLVT trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs DXC Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while DXC trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs PRFT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs ASGN Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while ASGN trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs WNS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while WNS trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs LZMH Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while LZMH trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -1358.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LZMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs FORTY Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while FORTY trades at $104.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs NABL Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while NABL trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 103.88. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs APLD Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while APLD trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs NYAX Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while NYAX trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 217.47. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs VYX Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while VYX trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs TASK Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while TASK trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs TWKS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs FLYW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while FLYW trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 284.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs GDYN Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while GDYN trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 107.46. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs INOD Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while INOD trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs BBAI-WT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while BBAI-WT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs BBAI Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while BBAI trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs MGIC Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 777.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while MGIC trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CLVT-PA Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs PSFE Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 754.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while PSFE trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs HCKT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 714.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while HCKT trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs XRX Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 696.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while XRX trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs BULLZ Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 678.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while BULLZ trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CTLP Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 620.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CTLP trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs PSFE-WT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 589.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs IBEX Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 382.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while IBEX trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs UIS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 381.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while UIS trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs DMRC Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 287.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while DMRC trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs VNET Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 282.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while VNET trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is 321.50. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs TTEC Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 245.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while TTEC trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs III Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 236.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while III trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas III's P/E ratio is 81.67. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to III's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs PHLT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 209.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while PHLT trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -33.37. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs TLS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 199.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while TLS trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SRT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CTG Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 168.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CSPI Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 143.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CSPI trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is 725.50. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs ALYA Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs NOTE Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 103.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while NOTE trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NOTE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs NOTE-WT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 99.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CTM Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 95.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CTM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs VEEA Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 88.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while VEEA trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VEEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs LHSW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 70.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while LHSW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LHSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SAIH Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 63.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SAIH trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs DVLT Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 59.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while DVLT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SDHIU Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 54.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SDHIU trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs GMM Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 48.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while GMM trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs WYY Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 41.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while WYY trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -20.19. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs USIO Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 38.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while USIO trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs MASK Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 37.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while MASK trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MASK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs GLE Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 35.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while GLE trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs BTCM Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 32.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while BTCM trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs DTST Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 27.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while DTST trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CLPS Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CLPS trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs ARBB Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 16.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while ARBB trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CYCU Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 15.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CYCU trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs JDZG Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 14.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while JDZG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SGLB Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs VEEAW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while VEEAW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SASI Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SASI's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs WAVD Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs TDTH Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while TDTH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TDTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs DTSTW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while DTSTW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs CYCUW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while CYCUW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs JFU Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 824131.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while JFU trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.
CNDT vs SAIHW Comparison
CNDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNDT stands at 364.12M. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 121785.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNDT is priced at $2.25, while SAIHW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNDT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.56, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNDT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNDT is more volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNDT.