Central Garden & Pet Company
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CENTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTA | $34.80 | -1.22% | 2.2B | 14.20 | $2.45 | N/A |
| JBS | $16.14 | -0.92% | 35.8B | 15.69 | $1.03 | +6.56% |
| KHC | $24.54 | +0.57% | 29B | -4.98 | -$4.93 | +6.50% |
| GIS | $45.38 | +1.70% | 24.2B | 9.76 | $4.65 | +5.34% |
| MKC | $69.53 | +1.50% | 18.7B | 23.73 | $2.93 | +2.63% |
| MKC-V | $69.14 | +1.75% | 18.6B | 23.70 | $2.93 | +2.66% |
| HRL | $25.16 | +0.68% | 13.8B | 28.91 | $0.87 | +4.61% |
| SJM | $111.00 | +0.56% | 11.8B | -9.88 | -$11.23 | +3.93% |
| PPC | $40.99 | -1.80% | 9.7B | 9.03 | $4.54 | +20.39% |
| MICC | $15.76 | -5.35% | 9.7B | 27.67 | $0.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CENTA vs JBS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while JBS trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check JBS's competition here
CENTA vs KHC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while KHC trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check KHC's competition here
CENTA vs GIS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while GIS trades at $45.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check GIS's competition here
CENTA vs MKC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MKC trades at $69.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MKC's competition here
CENTA vs MKC-V Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MKC-V trades at $69.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MKC-V's competition here
CENTA vs HRL Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while HRL trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check HRL's competition here
CENTA vs SJM Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SJM trades at $111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SJM's competition here
CENTA vs PPC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while PPC trades at $40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check PPC's competition here
CENTA vs MICC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MICC trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MICC's competition here
CENTA vs CAG Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while CAG trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -89.86. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check CAG's competition here
CENTA vs DAR Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while DAR trades at $51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 132.41. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check DAR's competition here
CENTA vs CPB Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while CPB trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check CPB's competition here
CENTA vs INGR Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while INGR trades at $116.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check INGR's competition here
CENTA vs LW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while LW trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check LW's competition here
CENTA vs POST Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while POST trades at $105.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check POST's competition here
CENTA vs BRFS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRFS's competition here
CENTA vs LANC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check LANC's competition here
CENTA vs MZTI Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MZTI trades at $163.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MZTI's competition here
CENTA vs TWNK Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check TWNK's competition here
CENTA vs TWNKW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check TWNKW's competition here
CENTA vs FRPT Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FRPT trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FRPT's competition here
CENTA vs CENT Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while CENT trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check CENT's competition here
CENTA vs SOVO Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SOVO's competition here
CENTA vs FLO Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FLO trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FLO's competition here
CENTA vs BRBR Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRBR trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRBR's competition here
CENTA vs HLF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while HLF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check HLF's competition here
CENTA vs KLG Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check KLG's competition here
CENTA vs NOMD Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while NOMD trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check NOMD's competition here
CENTA vs SMPL Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SMPL trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SMPL's competition here
CENTA vs JJSF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while JJSF trades at $84.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check JJSF's competition here
CENTA vs THS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check THS's competition here
CENTA vs JBSS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 973.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while JBSS trades at $83.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check JBSS's competition here
CENTA vs SENEA Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 921.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SENEA trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SENEA's competition here
CENTA vs SENEB Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 918.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SENEB trades at $133.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SENEB's competition here
CENTA vs UTZ Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 844.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while UTZ trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 954.50. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check UTZ's competition here
CENTA vs STKL Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 757.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while STKL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 160.00. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check STKL's competition here
CENTA vs MAMA Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 652.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MAMA trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 133.75. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MAMA's competition here
CENTA vs THRN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check THRN's competition here
CENTA vs WEST Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 474.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while WEST trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check WEST's competition here
CENTA vs NATR Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while NATR trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check NATR's competition here
CENTA vs BGS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 425.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BGS trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BGS's competition here
CENTA vs USNA Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 398.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while USNA trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check USNA's competition here
CENTA vs LWAY Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 330.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while LWAY trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check LWAY's competition here
CENTA vs BYND Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 317.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BYND trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BYND's competition here
CENTA vs FREE Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FREE's competition here
CENTA vs BRCC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 196.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRCC trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRCC's competition here
CENTA vs OFRM Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while OFRM trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -18.53. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OFRM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check OFRM's competition here
CENTA vs WESTW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check WESTW's competition here
CENTA vs FTLF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FTLF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FTLF's competition here
CENTA vs MMMB Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MMMB's competition here
CENTA vs PLIN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check PLIN's competition here
CENTA vs HAIN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while HAIN trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check HAIN's competition here
CENTA vs ABVE Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while ABVE trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check ABVE's competition here
CENTA vs BRID Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRID trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRID's competition here
CENTA vs DDC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while DDC trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check DDC's competition here
CENTA vs BOF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BOF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BOF's competition here
CENTA vs LFVN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while LFVN trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check LFVN's competition here
CENTA vs MITC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MITC's competition here
CENTA vs ORIS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while ORIS trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORIS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check ORIS's competition here
CENTA vs BRLS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRLS trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRLS's competition here
CENTA vs FARM Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FARM trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FARM's competition here
CENTA vs CLXT Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check CLXT's competition here
CENTA vs HAPP Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check HAPP's competition here
CENTA vs LSF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while LSF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check LSF's competition here
CENTA vs ABVEW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while ABVEW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check ABVEW's competition here
CENTA vs YGF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check YGF's competition here
CENTA vs WYHG Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while WYHG trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +40.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check WYHG's competition here
CENTA vs JVA Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while JVA trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check JVA's competition here
CENTA vs NAII Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while NAII trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check NAII's competition here
CENTA vs PLAG Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while PLAG trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check PLAG's competition here
CENTA vs COOT Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while COOT trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COOT's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check COOT's competition here
CENTA vs MWYN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while MWYN trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check MWYN's competition here
CENTA vs TTCF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check TTCF's competition here
CENTA vs PETZ Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while PETZ trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check PETZ's competition here
CENTA vs BON Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BON trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BON's competition here
CENTA vs NUZE Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check NUZE's competition here
CENTA vs NCRA Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while NCRA trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check NCRA's competition here
CENTA vs BTTR Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BTTR's competition here
CENTA vs SOWG Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SOWG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SOWG's competition here
CENTA vs IMG Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while IMG trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check IMG's competition here
CENTA vs HCWC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while HCWC trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check HCWC's competition here
CENTA vs CYAN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while CYAN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check CYAN's competition here
CENTA vs FREEW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FREEW's competition here
CENTA vs RGF Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check RGF's competition here
CENTA vs ATPC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while ATPC trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check ATPC's competition here
CENTA vs FAMI Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while FAMI trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check FAMI's competition here
CENTA vs BRLSW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRLSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRLSW's competition here
CENTA vs PAVS Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 820.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while PAVS trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check PAVS's competition here
CENTA vs STKH Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 124.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while STKH trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check STKH's competition here
CENTA vs BSFC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BSFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSFC's ROE of +10.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BSFC's competition here
CENTA vs SNAXW Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SNAXW's competition here
CENTA vs SNAX Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 13.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNAX's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SNAX's competition here
CENTA vs SMFL Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SMFL's competition here
CENTA vs RIBT Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check RIBT's competition here
CENTA vs VGFC Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check VGFC's competition here
CENTA vs SAFM Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check SAFM's competition here
CENTA vs BRCN Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check BRCN's competition here
CENTA vs DTEA Comparison February 2026
CENTA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CENTA stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CENTA is priced at $34.80, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CENTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CENTA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CENTA is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CENTA.Check DTEA's competition here